سلام مجدد دوستانی که در نظرسنجی شرکت کردن به پی وی بنده پیام بدن

Channel
0FFensive_H0riz0n
@oFHoz
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
553subscribers
-16 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003995104976 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @oFHoz |
| Created | Between 1 April 2026 and 30 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/oFHoz |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 18:14 | 553 | -16 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 03:32 | 569 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 21:18 | 569 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 10.1%
- avg views ÷ 553 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 55.9
- 19 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 2.73%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 20
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 14 of 19 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (30 July 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,063 |
| Reactions total | 23 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 03:32 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
23 reactions across 14 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 87.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 20 | 87.0% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 8.70% | |
| 😍 | 1 | 4.35% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 23reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
۵۷۱ عضو داره کانال هنوز نظرسنجی که راجع به خودتون هست به ۵۰ نفر نرسیده
❤5
دوستان در نظر سنجی شرکت کنید تا موضوعی رو در کنار هم بررسی کنیم.نیاز دارم بدونم در چه سطحی قرار دارن اعضای کانال و شرایط جمعی رو درنظر بگیریم
❤4
لطفا سطح خودتون در اوسینت رو مشخص کنید
- ضعيف39%
- متوسط52%
- خوب4%
- عالی9%
- حرفه ای0%
The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
0FFensive_H0riz0n pinned «@N0ee0 آیدی تلگرام خودمه اگر مسئله ای در راستای بهتر شدن موضوعات و یا سوالی بود خوشحال میشم عنوان کنید. در حد توانم اگر بتونم کاری کنم حتما انجام میدم»
این بخش هم بررسی شد دوستان و سعی کردم ساده و قابل فهم براتون جا بندازم یک موضوع تحقیقاتی رو انشالله که مفید واقع شده باشه قطعا یک گزارش اوسینت خیلی جامع تر هست ولی سعی کردم با مطالبی که تا الان بهتون منتقل کردم این موضوع رو براتون جا بندازم که موانع شروع کار در دهنتون کمتر بشه
❤1
۸-گزارش نمونه OSINT توجه: این گزارش کاملاً فرضی (Fake) بوده و صرفاً برای آموزش ساختار گزارشنویسی OSINT تهیه شده است. تمامی اسامی، شرکتها، آدرسها، سوابق و اطلاعات ذکرشده ساختگی هستند و به هیچ شخص حقیقی یا حقوقی اشاره ندارند. اطلاعات پرونده شماره پرونده: OSINT-2026-014 نوع تحقیق: بررسی هویت، سوابق حرفهای و ردپای دیجیتال وضعیت پرونده: تکمیل شده 1. مشخصات هدف: نام: علی احمدی تابعیت: ایرانی محل تولد: شیراز حوزه فعال…
❤1
۷-مرحله هفتم: ساخت Timeline (خط زمانی) تا اینجا اطلاعات مختلفی از هدف جمعآوری و اعتبارسنجی کردیم. اما این اطلاعات هنوز بهصورت پراکنده هستن و ممکنه درک روند فعالیتهای هدف کمی سخت باشه. اینجاست که Timeline به کمک ما میاد. Timeline یعنی اطلاعاتی که پیدا کردیم رو بر اساس زمان مرتب کنیم تا ببینیم هدف در طول سالها چه مسیری رو طی کرده. فرض کنیم از تحقیقاتمون به این اطلاعات رسیدیم: سال ۱۳۹۴ وارد دانشگاه شده. سال ۱۳۹۸ فا…
۶-مرحله ششم: اعتبارسنجی اطلاعات تا اینجا سرنخهای زیادی جمع کردیم، اما هنوز یک سؤال مهم باقی مونده: از کجا مطمئن بشیم اطلاعاتی که پیدا کردیم واقعاً درسته؟ اینجا یکی از مهمترین مراحل OSINT شروع میشه؛ اعتبارسنجی اطلاعات. یکی از اشتباهات رایج اینه که یک اطلاعات رو فقط به خاطر اینکه داخل اینترنت منتشر شده، درست بدونیم. در حالی که ممکنه اون اطلاعات قدیمی، ناقص یا حتی اشتباه باشه. برای همین، توی OSINT هیچ اطلاعاتی رو فق…
۵-مرحله پنجم: گسترش زنجیره سرنخها تا اینجا اطلاعات خوبی از هدف جمعآوری کردیم. اما یک تحلیلگر OSINT اینجا تحقیق رو متوقف نمیکنه. هر اطلاعاتی که تا این مرحله پیدا کردیم، میتونه یک مسیر جدید برای ادامه تحقیق باشه. به این روش میگیم گسترش زنجیره سرنخها. یعنی به جای اینکه فقط روی خود شخص تمرکز کنیم، سراغ اطلاعاتی میریم که به اون شخص مرتبط هستن. فرض کنیم تا اینجا فهمیدیم هدف در یک شرکت تجهیزات پزشکی کار میکنه. حالا…
❤1
۴-مرحله چهارم: پیدا کردن ردپای دیجیتال و شبکههای اجتماعی تا اینجا تصویر نسبتاً خوبی از هویت و فعالیت حرفهای هدف به دست آوردیم. حالا وقتشه ببینیم این شخص در فضای آنلاین چه ردپایی از خودش به جا گذاشته. اشتباهی که خیلیها انجام میدن اینه که از همون اول سراغ اینستاگرام یا بقیه شبکههای اجتماعی میرن. در حالی که اگر قبلش هویت فرد رو تا حدی مشخص کرده باشیم، احتمال اینکه حساب درست رو پیدا کنیم خیلی بیشتر میشه. توی این …
❤1
۳-مرحله سوم: بررسی ردپای حرفهای هدف تا اینجا تونستیم گزینههای نامرتبط رو کنار بذاریم و به یک یا چند گزینه که احتمال میدیم همون شخص موردنظر باشن برسیم. حالا وقتشه بررسی کنیم این افراد واقعاً چه فعالیتی دارن. این مرحله یکی از مهمترین بخشهای تحقیقه، چون معمولاً افراد در محیطهای کاری و حرفهای ردپای بیشتری از خودشون به جا میذارن. اینجا دنبال چه اطلاعاتی هستیم؟ ✓ عنوان شغلی ✓ شرکتی که در اون فعالیت میکنه ✓ سمت …
❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @oFHoz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
لطفا سطح خودتون در اوسینت رو مشخص کنید
- ضعيف39%
- متوسط52%
- خوب4%
- عالی9%
- حرفه ای0%
The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 587,208 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“0FFensive_H0riz0n” (@oFHoz), 553 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/oFHoz.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.