Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

͡ ︵ ׅㅤℳ𝑎𝑟𝑖'ˢ 𝒾𝑛𝑓𝑜 ㍋

@o3oi02

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

60subscribers

+12 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003698054614
TypeChannel
Username@o3oi02
Descriptionⲏⲉ ⲡⲣⲟⲧυⲃ ⳅⲏⲁⲕⲟⲙⲥⲧⲃ, ⲃⲥⲧⲩⲡⲁю ⲃ ⲫⲗⲩⲇы https://t.me/boost/o3oi02
Created20 January 2026measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held3
On Telegramt.me/o3oi02

Growth

4860546 August 2026 — 48 subscribers7 August 2026 — 60 subscribers10 August 2026 — 60 subscribers6 August 202610 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 3 days, net +12. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 46–62 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 05:0060no change
7 Aug 2026, 15:0060+12
6 Aug 2026, 18:2048first reading

Engagement

5 posts held, back to 20 January 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
335.0%
avg views ÷ 60 subscribers
Avg views / post
201
1 post measured
Reaction rate
42.8%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 5 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 August 2026
Posts held5 (20 January 20261 August 2026)
Views total201
Reactions total86
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Aug 2026, 05:00 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
1
Links
1

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

268 reactions across 4 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 52359467631431247896022.4%
custom 52449415198776023285219.4%
custom 53303835119101318814215.7%
custom 53304468369079438423914.6%
custom 5330441949235161600207.46%
custom 5226800617401370854176.34%
custom 5465336164649034605103.73%
custom 520183914365036584993.36%
custom 521112007835074538772.61%
custom 535714525556299919762.24%
custom 539767160919034743662.24%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 5 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 268reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 5 most recent posts we hold, published 20 January 2026 to 1 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
20
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 4 we hold a reading for · 100%
Most on one post
17
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @o3oi02. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 5 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 20 January 2026 to 1 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

1 Aug 2026, 15:47 UTC201 views86 reactions1 Starread 10 August 2026

🤩🎀🤩🔤𝒐𝒖𝒓 𝒐𝒑𝒊𝒏𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝒂𝒃𝒐𝒖𝒕 𝒎𝒆 🤩🤩 🤩ⲟⲿⲉⲧⲉ ⲟⲥⲧⲁⲃυⲧь ⲏυⲿⲉ ⲃⲁⲱⲉ ⲙⲏⲉⲏυⲉ ⲟⳝⲟ ⲙⲏⲉ. 🤩

custom 524494151987760232825custom 533038351191013188119custom 523594676314312478917custom 533044194923516160013custom 533044683690794384212

7 Jun 2026, 14:32 UTC503 views47 reactions1 Starread 10 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

custom 523594676314312478911custom 52449415198776023288custom 53304468369079438428custom 52111200783507453877custom 53303835119101318817custom 53976716091903474366

7 Jun 2026, 14:32 UTC492 views88 reactions17 Starsread 10 August 2026
Photo

🤍💙💙🤩💙💙💙💙🤩💙💙. ブラッディ・キス 🪦🥹𝟐𝟗.𝟎𝟔🪦 🤩🤩🥹🤩🤩. 𝑫𝒎 🌟 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🪦 ✶թׄ࿙ *⁠.⁠𝒮𝒽𝑒 /𝒽𝑒𝓇🤩🤍ৎ๋୨𑄹 𓄰 *.⁠౨ ⃟ ✨ ৎ๋。⁠*. 🤍✍️ℳ𝑜𝓇𝑒 𝒾𝓃𝒻𝑜𝓇𝓂𝒶𝓉𝒾𝑜𝓃 🪧 𝟗𝟗𝟗 ࣪ ۪ ꆬ 優しい愛 🤩༄౨ৎ๋ *.⁠ 𝑬𝑵𝑻𝑱-𝑨🪦 ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ 最後に🤩 🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍 𝒫𝑒𝒶𝒸𝑒 𝒸𝒶𝓂𝑒 𝓌𝒽𝑒𝓃 ℐ 𝓇𝑒𝒶𝓁𝒾𝓏𝑒𝒹 𝓃𝑜𝓉 𝑒𝓋𝑒𝓇𝓎𝓉𝒽𝒾𝓃𝑔 𝒾𝓈 𝓂𝑒𝒶𝓃𝓉 𝓉𝑜 𝓈𝓉𝒶𝓎.🤩 🤍🤍🤍🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 🪦🤍🛫𝙏𝙀𝙇𝙀𝙂𝙍𝘼𝙈 𝘾𝙃𝘼𝙉𝙉𝙀𝙇 🛫 🪦🤩🤩🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🤩🤩🪦

custom 523594676314312478922custom 533044683690794384219custom 522680061740137085417custom 524494151987760232811custom 533038351191013188110custom 52018391436503658499

20 Jan 2026, 19:41 UTC795 views47 reactions1 Starread 10 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

custom 523594676314312478910custom 546533616464903460510custom 52449415198776023288custom 53304419492351616007custom 53303835119101318816custom 53571452555629991976

Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @o3oi02. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 459,909 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“͡ ︵ ׅㅤℳ𝑎𝑟𝑖'ˢ 𝒾𝑛𝑓𝑜 ㍋” (@o3oi02), 60 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/o3oi02.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.