Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Nyx day to day

@nyxdtd

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

200subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003203208480
TypeChannel
Username@nyxdtd
CreatedBetween 1 October 2025 and 31 January 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/nyxdtd

Growth

2007 Aug 2026, 21:02 — 200 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 11:31 — 200 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 21:028 Aug 2026, 11:31
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 199–201 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 11:31200no change
7 Aug 2026, 21:02200first reading

Engagement

13 posts held, back to 20 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
663.3%
avg views ÷ 200 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,330
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.91%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 13 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 August 2026
Posts held13 (20 April 20261 August 2026)
Views total3,980
Reactions total76
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 11:31 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
63
Videos
4
Links
1

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
25s
Average length
25s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

355 reactions across 13 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
14039.4%
❤‍🔥12134.1%
🔥6618.6%
🥰92.54%
😍61.69%
👍41.13%
🍓30.845%
😈30.845%
🎉20.563%
🐳10.282%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 355reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 20 April 2026 to 1 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

1 Aug 2026, 17:42 UTC≈1,010 views21 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Its soo warm out side! Come on lets chill in the pool with your favorite scaly pooltoy :3

❤‍🔥10🔥5😍32🐳1

25 Jul 2026, 15:52 UTC≈1,220 views30 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Let me go you cute goober! I dont deserv any of this! LET ME GO!!

❤‍🔥188🔥4

18 Jul 2026, 13:59 UTC≈1,750 views25 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

A Good drone... hung back in storage after being used, locked, and kept on the edge for hours >:3

19❤‍🔥6

1 Jul 2026, 17:11 UTC≈1,050 views35 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Look at this goober falling into my dungeon~ properly millked and locked in place!

🔥1711❤‍🔥7

1 Jul 2026, 15:35 UTC360 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026

look mum! im on the main page! https://www.foxheavenstudio.com/ check out my friend work he makes really cool stuff x3

👍42

27 Jun 2026, 16:40 UTC977 views30 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Saturday night's set! Its time for some fun time~

❤‍🔥1811🔥1

20 Jun 2026, 18:14 UTC≈1,000 views26 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Look at this pooltoy, so squeky! And i swear i dont have someone locked in it!

❤‍🔥157🔥3😈1

16 Jun 2026, 16:32 UTC960 views32 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

swear i did not try to bite the cutie .... THIS IS AN UNDESERVED PUNISHMENT!!!

❤‍🔥1411🔥5😈2

5 Jun 2026, 09:14 UTC621 views34 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Soo, this is the reason why i was quiet! Finished all the construction in the dungeon omg omg

🔥1612🥰4🎉2

15 May 2026, 15:14 UTC≈1,170 views37 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Come cuddle me on this confy pooltoy~

20❤‍🔥8🥰5🔥3🍓1

1 May 2026, 14:22 UTC≈1,130 views23 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Starting the weekend with some chilling on some squiky toys!

❤‍🔥146🍓2🔥1

23 Apr 2026, 16:58 UTC≈1,280 views29 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

So you like pooltoys and balloons? wanna come over and play? :3

20❤‍🔥5🔥4

Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @nyxdtd. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 761,590 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Nyx day to day” (@nyxdtd), 200 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nyxdtd.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.