я вернулась сюда чтобы рассказать о том что децзюнь спит на вейбо лайве
⚡28❤18💋9💘7🍓5❤🔥3🍌2🐳2
Signed кокос

Channel
@nyu11xd
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
134subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001628514169 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @nyu11xd |
| Created | 7 August 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/nyu11xd |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 03:46 | 134 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 23:45 | 135 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 10:47 | 135 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 31 October 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 November 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
595 reactions across 14 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 157 | 26.4% | |
| 🍓 | 129 | 21.7% | |
| 💘 | 110 | 18.5% | |
| 💋 | 76 | 12.8% | |
| ⚡ | 28 | 4.71% | |
| 🦄 | 24 | 4.03% | |
| ❤🔥 | 22 | 3.70% | |
| 🍌 | 12 | 2.02% | |
| 🐳 | 9 | 1.51% | |
| 💔 | 8 | 1.34% | |
| 🆒 | 7 | 1.18% | |
| 🌚 | 6 | 1.01% | |
| 🥰 | 5 | 0.84% | |
| 🎉 | 1 | 0.168% | |
| 💅 | 1 | 0.168% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 595reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 31 October 2023 to 10 November 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
я вернулась сюда чтобы рассказать о том что децзюнь спит на вейбо лайве
⚡28❤18💋9💘7🍓5❤🔥3🍌2🐳2
Signed кокос
‼️WE DEMAND LABEL V & SM ENTERTAIMENT to do better handling the SECURITY & SAFETY issues! You’ve various ways to prevent this incident but you ignore it & almost harm your artists. Please protect & prioritize your artists safety. #SMpleaseProtectWayV @WayV_official @SMTOWNGLOBAL все пошли разрывать твиттер копируем нажатием
❤26💋4🍓3🦄3💘2🍌1
Signed кокос
сегодня вижены прилетели в ченду, в аэропорту была огромная толпа образовалась очень и сильная давка. людей было настолько много, что они задавали тэна и он упал, на вейбо пишут что янян тоже упал, а про сычена ЗАБЫЛА ОХРАНА и он один без защиты шел по этой адской толпе. на видео ссылку на которое я оставила выше, видно что толпа нереально большая и плотная, ее невозможно было проконтролировать. см могли бы организов…
🍓21❤10💘5💋2💔2🌚1🍌1🦄1
Signed кокос
#TENLEE: synonyms
❤25🦄16🍓14💋6❤🔥4💘4🍌1🐳1
Signed кокос
всем смотреть перфоманс на genie music 💌
💘29❤7❤🔥7🍓5🥰2🌚1🍌1💋1
Signed кокос
к завтрашнему дню постараюсь уже сделать стрим плейлист в спотифай 🫂
💋16🍓6💘6❤4🍌2🐳2❤🔥1🌚1
Signed кокос
друзья! дружно покупаем в iTunes сначала заглавку за 22рэ, потом можно весь альбом! главное - on my youth
🍓18💘8❤6💋5❤🔥2🌚2🍌1🎉1
Signed кокос
💙
❤10💋6💘3❤🔥2🍓2🐳2🍌1🆒1
Signed кокос
И ТАК. делитесь впечатлениями о клипе 🥸
❤7💋5💘4❤🔥2🍓2🌚1🍌1🐳1
Signed кокос
❤️🩹 минута
💘14❤5🍓3💋3❤🔥1🍌1🆒1
Signed кокос
мини гайд по стримингу “on my youth” каждый раз, смотря видео снова и снова, перед этим мы вбиваем в поисковую строку «wayv on my youth» —> разрешение hd, громкость ставим всегда больше 50%, УБИРАЕМ автоплэй, все только в ручную, при просмотре лайкайте, комментируете (смайлики не используйте) ‼️: только авторизированный канал, с анонима не стримим - толку 0. ❗️на повтор не нажимаем, страницу не обновляем. НЕ стави…
🍓26💘12💋9❤5💅1
Signed кокос
WayV 威神V 'On My Youth (遗憾效应)' MV Teaser Image 2 #YANGYANG
🍓17❤5💋4💘4🆒1
Signed кокос
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @nyu11xd. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 488,736 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@nyu11xd named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“нюта w(g)ayzenni 🎀” (@nyu11xd), 134 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nyu11xd.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.