Channel
@nxt888
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
874subscribers
+4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002073002421 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @nxt888 |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/nxt888 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 16:47 | 874 | +3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:25 | 871 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:16 | 870 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (1 August 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,293 |
| Reactions total | 69 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 04:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
69 reactions across 20 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 35 | 50.7% | |
| ❤ | 17 | 24.6% | |
| 💯 | 13 | 18.8% | |
| 👏 | 4 | 5.80% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 69reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
There is a reason the most sanctioned, bombed, isolated, and encircled countries on earth are described in Western media primarily through the suffering of their populations. Not as a form of compassion. As a form of argument. The North Korean people are starving. The Iranian people are oppressed. The Venezuelan people are suffering. The Cuban people are poor. The implicit conclusion, never quite stated, always c…
❤1👍1
The Promethean myth is precise. Prometheus did not create fire. Fire existed. The gods had it. Prometheus took it and gave it to human beings and was chained to a rock and tortured for eternity for the transgression. The transgression was not the fire. The transgression was the redistribution of power. The gods were not angry because fire was dangerous. They were angry because fire, in human hands, meant humans…
👏2
The empire needs its violence to be legible in a specific way. It needs to be regrettable. This is the crucial word. Regrettable. It performs enormous ideological work. The bombing is regrettable. The civilian casualties are regrettable. The unintended consequences, the collateral damage, the unavoidable costs of a complex operation in a difficult environment, all of it, regrettable. Regrettable means: we wish it…
👍1👏1
The word "escalation" is one of the most dishonest words in the imperial vocabulary. It never means: the powerful did something and the less powerful responded. It always means: the less powerful did something and we are now considering our options. Israel bombs Gaza for seventeen years. Blockades it. Starves it. Controls its airspace, its coastline, its water. That is called security management. A rocket fired …
💯3👍1
Here is what resistance and solidarity actually look like at civilizational scale. It does not look like a speech. It does not look like a vote in a body that the opposing side controls. It does not look like moral positioning that costs nothing and changes nothing. At civilizational scale, resistance looks like: A country absorbing every economic weapon the opposing side has and not collapsing. A country build…
❤4👍3
"Russia is standing for nothing." Russia, which is currently fighting the largest conventional land war in Europe since 1945, against a military supplied by more than fifty countries, funded by hundreds of billions in Western money, armed with the most sophisticated weapons NATO could transfer without triggering a formal Article 5 declaration. Russia, which has absorbed more than twenty-three thousand targeted sanc…
💯3👍1
Let’s stay with Iran for a moment. Who kept Iran alive? When the sanctions hit. When the oil revenues collapsed. When the currency crashed. When the spare parts for civilian aircraft stopped coming and Iranian planes started falling out of the sky. When the medical supply chains were disrupted and ordinary Iranians couldn't get cancer medication. Who kept Iran economically viable? China. China bought Iranian oil…
👍4
Let me say the uncomfortable thing directly. The critique that Russia and China "stand for nothing" comes, in many cases, from a political tradition that loves resistance as an aesthetic and is less comfortable with resistance as a project. Resistance as aesthetic is: The speech. The gesture. The flag. The recognition. The statement of solidarity. The vote at the United Nations. Resistance as project is: Buildin…
❤3👍1
Conscience is not weakness. This needs to be said plainly because an enormous amount of intellectual energy has been spent, across centuries of imperial culture, teaching people that it is. The soldier who refuses an illegal order is not weak. He is exercising the only form of courage that actually costs something: the refusal to do harm when doing harm is easy, authorized, and expected. The politician who says "t…
👍1
The Cuban Missile Crisis is taught in American schools as the moment the world almost ended because the Soviets put nuclear weapons in Cuba. It is almost never taught as: The moment the United States discovered what it felt like to have nuclear weapons pointed at it from nearby, which was the permanent reality of every Soviet city that had lived under American nuclear targeting from bases in Turkey, Italy, and Brit…
👍6❤1
Muammar Gaddafi gave up his nuclear program in 2003. He negotiated. He complied. He handed over the centrifuges and the documentation and accepted international inspectors and did everything the West said a responsible leader should do. He believed the deal. He believed that compliance would produce security. In 2011, NATO bombed his country for seven months. Hillary Clinton, upon hearing of his death, after he …
👍4
The Promethean fire does not only mean the bomb. It means any capability that restructures the power relationship. A domestic oil refinery. A state-owned bank outside the SWIFT system. A satellite navigation system that doesn't depend on American GPS. A currency arrangement that doesn't route through the dollar. A vaccine produced outside Western pharmaceutical infrastructure. Each of these, in its domain, is the …
👍2❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @nxt888. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 512,185 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Sony Thăng” (@nxt888), 874 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nxt888.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.