ֵ⸝ 𝗻a𝘃i 𝗴a𝘁i𝗼n ۫ 🌟 ᴩᴀбоᴛᴀᴇʍ ужᴇ ᴋᴀᴋ 2 ᴦодᴀ ! 𐫘ㅤ⵿ ׄ 💗 .ܸ 𝐢 𝐰𝐚𝐧𝐧𝐚 𝐤𝐢𝐬𝐬 𝐧 𝐭𝐞𝐥𝐥 ㅤִㅤ group ㅤ۫ ₇₀ under the wing ࣶ ֹ ⬞ ◗ ִ 🧷 𝗼u𝗿 ﹙ s𝘁a𝗳f ﹚ ִ ˖ 𝐕𝐞𝐬𝐩𝐞𝐫𝐚 𝐚𝐢𝐤𝐲𝐨 𝐬𝐨𝐚 ² 🍗 তৰা𝗰o𝗼p𝗲r𝗮t𝗶o𝗻 ִ ︵࣮ ࣪ 𓏺𓏺𝘄e𝗯s𝗶t𝗲. 𝗯o𝗼s𝘁 ׅ 𝘁…

Channel
news ’ 01 🌊
@nwoi0
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
710subscribers
-5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003967324833 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @nwoi0 |
| Created | Between 1 April 2026 and 31 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/nwoi0 |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 13:32 | 710 | -5 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:16 | 715 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:19 | 715 | first reading |
Engagement
13 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 6.91%
- avg views ÷ 710 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 49.1
- 13 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 3.19%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 13
- of 13 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 6 of 13 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 13 (7 August 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 638 |
| Reactions total | 10 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 02:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 2m 50s
- Average length
- 2m 50s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
10 reactions across 5 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 6 | 60.0% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 20.0% | |
| 🤮 | 2 | 20.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
🍭 mio mio port выложили новую работу! https://t.me/miomioport/191?single #MIOMIO #PORT
🩷 y LUXXES стукнуло 62 подписчика https://t.me/Luxxes_oii #LUXXES #GROUP
🫶🏻 PINK MOON проводят опрос https://t.me/pinkmoon_officia/623 #PINK #MOON
🩷 Sunshine Port открыли набор на заказы https://t.me/SNSHPORT/147?single #SUNSHINE #PORT
🎀 🐈⬛DEBUT | MEOW COVER GROUP 🎀 MEOW MEOW MEOW MEOW MEOW M ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ meow by meovv — 06.08.2026 #meow #debut
🤩 новое караоке на канале Charge https://t.me/chargeoi/162
❤3🔥1
💚 новая группа проводит опрос https://t.me/VILLIXXOI/10 #NEW #GROUP
❤1
🤎 открылся новый проект газета ои https://t.me/Gazeta_oinews/13 #GAZETA #OI
❤1
🐈⬛️ объявлено о дебюте новой солистки на 10 подписчиков https://t.me/soonnewsolo/2 #NEW #SOLO
🫂 Марлен выпустила новую статью https://t.me/Narter_mar/746?singl #MARLEN #JOUR
🔥1
🩷 объявлено о открытии нового проекта на 25 подписчиков https://t.me/fashionweek_oi/6 #NEW #PROJECT
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @nwoi0. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 105,098 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 16 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@nwpt5 · 322 postsS E ?¡ NA // solo 👛
@senasolos · 412 posts𝘣𝘭о𝘴𝘴о𝘮 🪷
@blossom_oigirly · 101 post🍓─ 𝐇𝐎𝐃 𝐋𝐀𝐁𝐄𝐋 ─ 🍓
@hodlabel_oi · 691 postТут всё про ои^^
@HwangRuby_NeswOI · 521 postJessie - Solo
@jessiesoloo · 71 post𝐋𝐚𝐢𝐦𝐢 𝐞𝐧𝐭🍋
@laimient · 291 post~ lҽҽ sαվα |🧩| ᴍᴀɴᴀɢᴇʀ
@Leesaya_manager · 51 post#aud ᎷɑƳ ᱞR𐌏D
@mayprod0 · 161 post[AUD] ⋆ .˚ 𝓜𝘦𝘭𝘭𝘪𝘧𝘭𝘶𝘰𝘶𝑠
@Melliflu0us6 · 61 post𝘕𝘦𝘸𝐹𝑎𝑚𝑜𝑢𝑠 ((𝖼𝗏.𝖡𝖺𝗇𝖽))
@newfamous_cv · 121 post𝒩 𝐼𝒮𝒜 𝒪𝐼 || 𝒮 𝒪 𝐿𝒪ⁿⁱˢᵃ ᵒⁱ ˢᵒˡ0 🩷🎀
@NISAoiiii · 101 post𝑹𝒆𝒄𝒐𝒎𝒎𝒆𝒏𝒅
@recommendoi · 661 post𝕊𝕚𝕖𝕟𝕟𝕒 𝕤𝕠𝕝𝕠|𝕆𝕀
@SiennaSolo · 451 post🏩 𝗜𝘁'𝘇 𝕶𝗂𝖾𝗅! #dsbpbg
@the_kiel · 181 post๑. .𝗪𝖴𝖬𝗘𝖱𝖸 ˋˋ 𝗍rᥙᥱ skzz
@wumery_oi · 91 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@chargeoi · 241 post︎ ִ ︎ ︎ ︎ ︎ 𝝴gゲ ︎ ׅ𓈒 ︎ ︎ ︎ ࣪ 𝐞n𝘁
@eg_ent · 381 post𝗙𐐼ִ𝘀hׁı๋𐐫𝗻 𝘄ֹᧉᧉ𝗸ֹ 𐐫ı๋
@fashionweek_oi · 51 post📰ˎˎ Гαзᥱтᥲ ᥆í ˊˊ(𝘯𝘦𝘸𝘴 𝘰𝘪)༅
@Gazeta_oinews · 101 post£𝐔𝕏𝚇𝐸ׅ꯱ //𝘖𝐈"
@Luxxes_oii · 621 postmeow
@meow_oi_group · 461 postოꪱ๋𑄝 ოꪱ๋𑄝𐙚 🍭[թ𑄝rt]
@miomioport · 451 postᱬ𐌳𐍂𑀉ꤕ𐌽 𐌽𐌳𐍂ተꤕ𐍂💛🇰🇷
@Narter_mar · 1221 post[AUDITION] ꨄ︎ 𝙉𝕺ℐ𝑹 . . . [현]
@noiroigg · 261 post𝘗𝘐𝘕𝘒 𝘔𝘖𝘖𝘕ᵍʳᵒᵘᵖ🤍
@pinkmoon_officia · 121 postZz` 𝘚𝘶𝘯𝘴𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘦 𝘱𝘰𝘳𝘵 : 💛
@SNSHPORT · 1051 postᏉᏐℒℒᏐ𝔛𝔛 👽
@VILLIXXOI · 31 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“news ’ 01 🌊” (@nwoi0), 710 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nwoi0.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.