Про сексолога вот выше выходило, можно вернуться
👍22😁9🤣5❤2😢2

Channel
@nuzavas
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
4,037subscribers
-16 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001958277221 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @nuzavas |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 20 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 20 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/nuzavas |
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 20 Aug 2026, 00:36 | 4,037 | -4 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 15:18 | 4,041 | -4 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 22:13 | 4,045 | -2 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 00:54 | 4,047 | -5 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:15 | 4,052 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 04:18 | 4,053 | no change |
| 5 Aug 2026, 22:11 | 4,053 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 14 November 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 January 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
2,591 reactions across 20 posts, in 37 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 819 | 31.6% | |
| ❤ | 663 | 25.6% | |
| 🔥 | 530 | 20.5% | |
| 😁 | 291 | 11.2% | |
| 😱 | 56 | 2.16% | |
| 💯 | 43 | 1.66% | |
| 🥰 | 23 | 0.888% | |
| 👏 | 20 | 0.772% | |
| 🤔 | 14 | 0.54% | |
| ⚡ | 12 | 0.463% | |
| 👎 | 12 | 0.463% | |
| 🤪 | 11 | 0.425% | |
| 🤝 | 10 | 0.386% | |
| 🥱 | 10 | 0.386% | |
| 😢 | 9 | 0.347% | |
| 🤣 | 9 | 0.347% | |
| 🤮 | 9 | 0.347% | |
| ❤🔥 | 8 | 0.309% | |
| ✍ | 6 | 0.232% | |
| 🦄 | 5 | 0.193% | |
| 17 further kinds | 31 | 1.20% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,591reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 14 November 2023 to 15 January 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Про сексолога вот выше выходило, можно вернуться
👍22😁9🤣5❤2😢2
Про эффективное обучение Видео: https://youtu.be/NF9rwQxsD1w Дядя — методолог обучения и когнитивист. В видео — мастер-класс иерархического освоения информации. Главный посыл — не надо торчать внутри нарратива какого-то автора. Если автор объясняет тему через А → Б → В, вам не нужно именно так это воспринимать. Нужно ломать этот нарратив и работать с материалом нелинейно. Вам нужно строить иерархические связи, ос…
❤69👍36🔥12✍3😘3👏2🤷♂2
На всякий случай: лекций в свободном доступе нет, это платная программа Питерсона, сейчас стоит 500$. https://petersonacademy.com/courses/the-sermon-on-the-mount/
😱53👍12❤4💩3👎2🔥2🤓2❤🔥1
Следующий конспект
The shares total 163%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
🔥12🤔2
Снова здравствуйте. Я опять насмотрелся Питерсона, на этот раз про «Нагорную проповедь» — это та, где Христос учит не копить земные богатства и подставлять вторую щеку. Было дико интересно, почему христианство учит быть лохом (как мне всегда казалось). Разумеется, никаким лохом никто никого быть не учит, если слушать правильного проповедника. Потребуется некоторое время, чтобы написать и оформить конспекты. А пока…
🔥104❤26👍12👀2🤡1🤷1
Конспект большого разговора с сексологом: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1-N2rf9-6L4U9tVYE6Upfr2y5viuGsH4P9Ojc4hgHvjU/edit?usp=sharing Кликать можно, только если вам больше 18 лет. Если меньше — идите к своим родителям, пусть они сами все прочитают и нужное перескажут вам.
❤88👍36😁22🌭4❤🔥3🔥2👌1
Альбина Комиссарова рассказывает о питании. В двух словах так: — Не жри лишнего — Особенно не кусочничай — Остальное пофигу, в принципе. Что хочешь — то ешь — Ну и чтобы были белки, жиры, углеводы, всякая клетчатка, туда-сюда В общем, повод разжать булки. Булки, кстати, тоже в меру можно. Конспект: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1NXt-S4wxgOcGmlmYYLpMFcWcPzu5wcslThJwh8Cv0wo/edit#heading=h.9oqorur13uzp Фулл: ht…
😁111👍34❤12🔥5🤝4🤣3👎1💅1
Это не то интервью, которое сегодня все смотрят. Но тоже про историю — историю семьи. — Был ли матриархат? — Что там по моногамии и полигамии? — Зачем нам семья? — Почему раньше красились мужчины, а теперь — женщины? В общем, антропология семьи. Добрый винтажный разговор с ковидных времен: https://docs.google.com/document/d/16QlGCtvCj__OvGTTN9P3bOedFvpePXkBlgX-Ho9XUwo/edit Сам видосик: https://www.youtube.com/watc…
❤48🔥15🤮7😁6👍1
Про одиночество Видосик очередного мотиватора. Чел сомнительный, но вещи говорит здравые: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D46zvJI-njU Конспект Леры Чепровой: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1bu_GynvhgqcOUO9qOnRXSNIVSSZK4GhrQ9Lx5A8WAws/edit От Ильяхова: в последние месяца три думаю о том, как мы все переплетены и соединены общей корневой системой. Один человек сам по себе может справляться до определенного момен…
🔥96💯19❤16👍8😁4
Оказывается, «Как читать и запоминать» уже выходило, глядите: https://t.me/nuzavas/12 И про психосоматику: https://t.me/nuzavas/24
❤29🦄5👍1
Дай пять доктору Питерсону за бесценные советы для супругов и людей в тяжелом положении 1. Слушай жену 2. Внимательно слушай жену 3. Ты невнимательно слушаешь жену, послушай жену внимательнее 4. Не ври жене 5. Приберись в комнате Конспект: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1H1mJR2J-fl1IeY8RMtBLUdsbBt_BNEflG8GBO-aTxMo/edit Видео: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IRCZ1Mt2a8M Если серьезно, то тут есть одна глубокая…
❤149👍39😁13⚡12🤪11🤔6🔥5😱3
Далее в канале
The shares total 143%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
❤5❤🔥4🐳1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @nuzavas. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Следующий конспект
The shares total 163%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Далее в канале
The shares total 143%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 14 November 2023 to 15 January 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 962,474 of 1,583,249entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 20 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Посмотрели за вас” (@nuzavas), 4,037 subscribers as measured 20 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nuzavas.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.