Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for NUTRI SHOP ЭНЕРГИЯ 2.0

Channel

NUTRI SHOP ЭНЕРГИЯ 2.0

@nutri_sh

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

1,315subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001934701576
TypeChannel
Username@nutri_sh
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live21 August 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 21 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/nutri_sh

Growth

1,3151,3181,316.57 August 2026 — 1,315 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,315 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,316 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,318 subscribers15 August 2026 — 1,317 subscribers21 August 2026 — 1,315 subscribers7 August 202621 August 2026
6 measurements spanning 14 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,315–1,318 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
21 Aug 2026, 17:581,315-2
15 Aug 2026, 01:051,317-1
11 Aug 2026, 18:091,318+2
8 Aug 2026, 07:221,316+1
7 Aug 2026, 12:021,315no change
7 Aug 2026, 11:581,315first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 4 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
9.16%
avg views ÷ 1,315 subscribers
Avg views / post
121
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
15.4%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 11 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 July 2026
Posts held11 (4 July 202631 July 2026)
Views total241
Reactions total37
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 12:02 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

168 reactions across 11 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥6438.1%
5432.1%
👍4124.4%
🥰52.98%
💯42.38%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 168reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 4 July 2026 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 11 we hold a reading for · 9%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @nutri_sh. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 11 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 July 2026 to 31 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

31 Jul 2026, 13:30 UTC96 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Что я оценивая в первую очередь со своими клиентами, над чем вы тоже можете поразмыслить.

9🔥6👍4

29 Jul 2026, 03:33 UTC145 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Врачи лечат нас УФ-светом в клиниках и берут за это деньги, а потом говорят - избегать солнца. 😱 Солнце запускает систему, которая производит гормоны, укрепляет сосуды и регулирует иммунитет. А в чём подвох? Солнце бесплатно.🔄 Вы замечали это противоречие или слышите это в первый раз? Напишите в комментариях.

12🔥6

14 Jul 2026, 13:23 UTC277 views27 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Сегодня будет уязвимая тема особенно родителям у которых есть дети от 3-5, есть над чем задуматься. Ученые обнаружили тревожную связь: дети, проводящие более двух часов в день перед экраном гаджетов, демонстрируют изменения в работе развивающегося мозга. Что происходит с мозгом ребенка, который с первых лет жизни растет под воздействием искусственного света экранов? А если к этому добавить… — LED-освещение в дет

👍158🔥4

14 Jul 2026, 00:39 UTC202 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Voice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

6👍5

14 Jul 2026, 00:39 UTC199 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Ответила👇почему я сплю на матрасе с магнитами. В конце дала лайхов для тех кто живет выше 51 широты. #сон #магниты #магнитное_поле_земли

3

11 Jul 2026, 14:28 UTC232 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Наглядный пример того, как реагирует наша автономная нервная система на раздражители и осознанное терапевтическое дыхание. Бывший парамедик - ежедневный стресс, постоянный срыв, не выдержит только монстер или драг абьюзер кем он и стал. Человек вернул себе жизнь благодаря практике дыхания. Кто-нибудь выполняет эту практику?

🔥13

8 Jul 2026, 12:55 UTC226 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

👍42🥰2

7 Jul 2026, 16:31 UTC255 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

♦️Не все так полезно и романтично как утверждают производители бадов.

9👍7

5 Jul 2026, 21:50 UTC266 views21 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Video

🤡 Горячие новости подоспели в разгар лета и как никогда кстате! Высоченные риски рака кожи в ответ на солнцезащитные средства. «Какое разоблачение». 😱 🔴Мой опрос показывает что одна треть с осторожностью относится к солнцу - здесь нет ни чего удивительного, ребята, я вас понимаю и не осуждаю так как большинство моего окружения и вашего используют SPF. ✈️Думаю собрать желающих в закрытый клуб, где обсудим подгот

🔥13💯4🥰31

4 Jul 2026, 03:28 UTC260 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Пока собираю статстику давайте поразмышляем…. Нам навязывают наратив 📦 Загар это «повреждение кожи», а оказалось он служит биологической бронью. Противовоспалительный. Антибактериальный. Выводит ртуть, кадмий и алюминий из тела. А учёные уже исследуют его как потенциальное противораковое соединение. Интересный однако вопрос: Почему природа наделила меланином почти каждый живой вид на планете? Если это просто «

🔥104👍2

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @nutri_sh. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Заметки невролога Овсянникова КС
@zametki_nevrologa · 71,087
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 20 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 21 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“NUTRI SHOP ЭНЕРГИЯ 2.0” (@nutri_sh), 1,315 subscribers as measured 21 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nutri_sh.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.