Channel
@nuria_alabao
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
661subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001536849714 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @nuria_alabao |
| Description | De momento solo artículos y alguna convocatoria. Prometo no dar mucho la chapa. Más patatas aquí: https://linktr.ee/nuria.alabao |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/nuria_alabao |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Aug 2026, 17:18 | 661 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 08:53 | 661 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 15 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (15 December 2025 – 28 July 2026) |
| Views total | 259 |
| Reactions total | 2 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 17:18 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
187 reactions across 20 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 73.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 137 | 73.3% | |
| 👏 | 16 | 8.56% | |
| 🔥 | 16 | 8.56% | |
| 👍 | 8 | 4.28% | |
| ❤🔥 | 6 | 3.21% | |
| 🤯 | 3 | 1.60% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 0.535% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 187reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 15 December 2025 to 28 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
‘La cárcel es un paseo’ y otras ideas equivocadas sobre prisión. Entrevisto a Ana Gordaliza para explicaros cómo es una cárcel y cuál son sus lógicas de control y su función social. ¿Por qué sirve para manejar las consecuencias de la desigualdad? ¿Cómo funcionan los distintos grados penitenciarios? ¿Por qué hay tantos suicidios y otro tipo de muertes? ¿Y por qué hay tantos migrantes? ¿Se consumen drogas en su interi…
❤2
🔥 Están aquí desde hace tiempo pero a medida que la IA gana capacidad, los compañeros y compañeras digitales son cada vez más hábiles para conquistar tu corazón. ¿Qué lleva a los jóvenes, y no tan jóvenes, a vincularse a una máquina? Ante los problemas de soledad y las dificultades de establecer conexiones humanas, vincularse emocionalmente con máquinas será parte de nuestro futuro. Ya lo está siendo de nuestro pres…
🤯2
Reflexiono aquí sobre la creación de las figuras protagonistas de los pánicos morales actuales: "el sinpapeles" y "el mena" en los "barrrios amenazados" y sus consecuencias políticas y sociales. Con ellas se apuntala la deriva autoritaria y la derechización social. @ctxtes. “Sinpapeles”, “menas” y derechización del sentido común
❤3👏2👍1
He entrevistado a la escritora mexicana Dahlia Delacerda y dice cosas sobre su obra y el feminismo sobre las que vale la pena reflexionar. @ctxtes "Mi obra no solo dialoga con la violencia que viven las mujeres precarizadas y racializadas, sino también con la violencia que viven los hombres precarizados y racializados. Es un error pensar solamente en las mujeres como si los hombres violentos existieran en abstracto.…
❤5🔥3🤔1
Hablar de prioridad nacional, pero vivir a costa de los migrantes "La prosperidad relativa de muchos hogares de clase media y su acceso a determinados servicios descansan, en buena medida, sobre la subordinación de los migrantes de clase trabajadora. ¿Estamos dispuestos a reconocer que, en no pocos ámbitos, vivimos mejor porque otros viven peor?" En @ctxtes https://ctxt.es/es/20260501/Firmas/53278/nuria-alabao-pri…
🔥7❤4👏1
¿Amor romántico o machismo? Jóvenes y control de la pareja El ideal de pareja tiende a consolidarse como un anclaje frente a la incertidumbre de la vida contemporánea. Pero mientras las relaciones afectivas se vuelven más abiertas, la producción cultural mantiene y difunde ideales románticos que miran al pasado. Ese imaginario conserva una amplia adhesión entre jóvenes de ambos sexos. Sin embargo, los varones justi…
❤3👍3❤🔥1👏1
"Tenemos que enseñar a las chicas a estar orgullosas de sus mamadas", es una frase de Virgine Despentes que captura bien una tarea fundamental de los feminismos. Propongo aquí una forma de abordar la violencia digital que además de enfrentarla se proponga desactivar también la vergüenza que opera como mecanismo de disciplinamiento. Porque cuando una adolescente recibe una imagen suya que se está difundiendo donde ha…
❤11❤🔥2👏1
En el crecimiento del antifeminismo en los jóvenes, ¿son más determinantes las causas materiales o culturales? Como sucede también con las derechas radicales son ambas cuestiones entrelazadas. Lo intento explicar a partir del caso coreano. Atrapados entre la falta de expectativas vitales y el cambio en los roles de género, los chavales se enfadan con el feminismo y no con quien los precariza. @ctxtes Antifeminismo …
❤7❤🔥2👍1
Para construir ese proyecto son imprescindibles debates que nos permitan trabajar en común a pesar de las diferencias. Necesitamos movimientos capaces de discutir de todo, con amabilidad, porque eso es lo que nos hace fuertes. El consenso forzado y el silenciamiento de las disidencias internas son prácticas autoritarias más propias de nuestros enemigos. @ctxtes https://ctxt.es/es/20260301/Firmas/52460/Nuria-Alabao-8…
❤12👏3
Pasiones tristes al servicio del capital y el fascismo (o el porqué del odio en redes) Sirviéndose de algoritmos opacos, las plataformas reman a favor de las extremas derechas y sus afectos negativos. Nuestra vida psíquica es capturada mediante los dispositivos digitales para transformarse en beneficio pero también para controlarnos mejor. En @ctxtes https://ctxt.es/es/20260201/Firmas/52262/Nuria-Alabao-internet-rr…
❤9👏2
Laura Hurtado me entrevisa para Crític. ¿Qué le puedo de decir a mi hijo de 15 años cuando me cuestiona las cuotas? La reacción más habitual es enfadarnos. Pero los adolescentes buscan precisamente esto, porque están en una etapa de la vida donde rebelarse forma parte de su construcción como personas. Y ellos identifican el feminismo como la autoridad, lo que defiende el gobierno, el profesorado y la mayoría de los…
❤20🔥2❤🔥1👍1👏1
Os dejo con algunos links sobre "Gymbros, criptobros y otras especies antifeministas". 📌 La entrevista que me hace El País. Si el feminismo intenta explicar que las mujeres tienen una posición de subordinación en la sociedad, ellos tratan de invertirla, de decir que son realmente los hombres los que están peor. La victimización es una estrategia política muy contemporánea. Para eso utilizan una batería de referenci…
❤7
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @nuria_alabao. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 136,871 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Nuria Alabao” (@nuria_alabao), 661 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nuria_alabao.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.