Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Нулевая степень

@nullusgradus

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

442subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001983978853
TypeChannel
Username@nullusgradus
CreatedBetween 1 March 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/nullusgradus

Growth

4426 Aug 2026, 19:18 — 442 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 19:24 — 442 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 19:186 Aug 2026, 19:24
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 441–443 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Aug 2026, 19:24442no change
6 Aug 2026, 19:18442first reading

Engagement

7 posts held, back to 30 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

103 reactions across 7 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
5957.3%
🔥1716.5%
🎉1413.6%
👏65.83%
🥰43.88%
👍21.94%
❤‍🔥10.971%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 103reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 30 May 2026 to 30 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 7 we hold a reading for · 29%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @nullusgradus. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 7 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 May 2026 to 30 June 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

30 Jun 2026, 10:02 UTC156 views38 reactions1 Starread 6 August 2026
Photo

Ура! Нам 3 года! Отметили день рождения и закрыли сезон с традиционным кексиками и даже танцами на балконе! Спасибо вам, что были с нами в прошлое воскресенье и весь этот сезон! Без вас, дорогие слушатели, лекторы и друзья, «Нулевая степень» бы не случилась. 💜 До встречи в следующем сезоне!

21🎉12🔥4❤‍🔥1

17 Jun 2026, 17:38 UTC308 views9 reactionsread 6 August 2026

🎉Встречаемся на дне рождения лектория уже через несколько дней! Для начала вместе с Маргаритой Спиричевой узнаем, как создать алфавит для бесписьменных народов, если вы миссионер или, например, большевик. А потом обсудим с Антоном Морозовым, как жить в 1930-е и не отчаяться. А ещё закроем этот сезон и отметим кексами наше трехлетие💜 До встречи в Циферблате — свободном пространстве, где платят за время. Кофе и

6🎉2👏1

14 Jun 2026, 18:42 UTC307 views18 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Представляем второго лектора заключительной встречи сезона! ⏰ 1930-е годы в истории России воспринимаются довольно однозначно, как нечто страшное. Но люди, жившие в это время, смотрели на мир вокруг иначе. Что они переживали и как об этом думали, чувствовали и говорили? Почему для кого-то это была эпоха террора, а для кого-то — светлая страница в памяти? Эти и другие вопросы обсудим вместе с историком Антоном Морозо

10👏4🔥4

11 Jun 2026, 09:04 UTC535 views9 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Представляем первого лектора последней встречи сезона! ☀️ На лекции мы узнаем, как создавалась письменность для бесписьменных народов России, а именно хантов и других народов Севера. Какие алфавиты предлагали миссионеры и почему они не прижились? Была ли преемственность между дореволюционными и советскими алфавитами или это действительно «история двух разных миров»? Почему многие проблемы тех лет (например, выбор ди

7🔥1🥰1

5 Jun 2026, 13:07 UTC498 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Лето точно наступило. А мы закрываем третий сезон! ✨ 21 июня встретимся в Циферблате на Мойке и вернемся в ... СССР (и не только). С лингвистом Маргаритой Спиричевой обсудим, как создавались азбуки для бесписьменных народов в 19-20 веках. А с историком Антоном Морозовым продолжим (уже было 1 и 2) изучать жизнь в Советском союзе и посмотрим, каково это — жить в 1930-е. Обе лекции будут длиться по 45 минут. И после

🔥41👏1

30 May 2026, 17:12 UTC274 views18 reactions1 Starread 6 August 2026
Photo

Всю неделю согревались воспоминаниями о встрече в воскресенье. Спасибо, что были с нами! До встречи 21 июня! Будем слушать лекции, отмечать день рождения и закрывать сезон. ✨

12🥰3👍2🔥1

Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @nullusgradus. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 200,149 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Нулевая степень” (@nullusgradus), 442 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nullusgradus.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.