Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 暖暖朋友圈

Channel

暖暖朋友圈

@nuan587

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

47subscribers

+44 since we began measuring on 8 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004393618990
TypeChannel
Username@nuan587
CreatedBetween 1 June 2026 and 31 August 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 September 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/nuan587

Growth

353288 September 2026 — 3 subscribers11 September 2026 — 53 subscribers11 September 2026 — 53 subscribers19 September 2026 — 47 subscribers478 September 202619 September 2026
4 measurements spanning 11 days, net +44. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 16:2147-6
11 Sept 2026, 13:2253no change
11 Sept 2026, 12:3853+50
8 Sept 2026, 21:473first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 9 September 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
603.1%
avg views ÷ 47 subscribers
Avg views / post
283
16 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
17
of 17 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 September 2026
Posts held17 (9 September 202611 September 2026)
Views total4,535
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Sept 2026, 13:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 00s
Average length
30s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

11 Sept 2026, 09:58 UTC48 viewsread 11 September 2026

杭州一哥课堂:https://t.me/yigechat 【老师花名】:#暖暖 【老师 I D】: 【验证留名】: # @闪电(加分需用户名) 【出击时间】: 9.11 【课室位置】: #火车东站附近 【喝茶费用】: 300P 【高端服务】: 有的打 ✅ 没有打 ❎ 舌吻 ✅ 69 ✅ 毒龙没要 情绪价值 满分 【身材尺寸】:身高 :160左右,体重 100左右 罩杯 C 【湿度紧度】:水量:如泉水般涌出|湿紧度 :很紧,插入感满分 【个人卫生】:不抽烟|少量纹身 【时间管理】:无催钟 【推荐程度】:主观打分 9分满分10分 【报告正文】: 老师新租的房子,看得出来是刚来杭州没多久,没什么风尘感,女友感满满。进门先休息老师给拿了冰镇饮料喝,帮忙脱衣,开始舌吻,老师胸很软,揉着揉着小弟弟就受不了了,抱起老师进屋,上下其手,小妹妹湿湿的,水很多,戴套开干,老师下面挺紧的,包裹感很好,还没等到换姿势就交货了,

11 Sept 2026, 09:55 UTC41 viewsread 11 September 2026

杭州一哥课堂 http://t.me/yigechat 【时间】: 2026-09-11 【老师】: 暖暖 【I D 】: @nuan389 【留名】: 罗飞 【人照】: 8 【颜值】: 8 【身材】: 8 【服务】: 9 【态度】: 9 【环境】: 9 【综合】: 8.5 【报告正文】 教室在高架口子上 开车很方便。教室也是在一个新小区里 很安全。老师是东北人,少妇长相,年龄和描述差不多。胸应该有b一只手抓着正好满满的。服务态度很好,老师是新做这一行的 很敬业一直问如果不舒服的话要尽量说。下面水超级多 做起来很滑,老师也很投入,下次还会再来的

10 Sept 2026, 13:24 UTC214 viewsread 11 September 2026

杭州狼友cj圈报告模板: https://t.me/hznpwanfataolun 【综合评价】:#超级好评 #好评 #中评 #差评 【验证留名】:懒人 【验证时间】:9月10日 【妹子花名】: 暖暖 【联系方式】: @nuan389 【所在位置】:东站附近 【修车水费】:工兵 【高端服务】:有的打✅ ① 舌吻 ✔ ② 69舔逼 没要 ③ 情绪价值 ✔ ④ 毒龙 没要 【身高身材】:身高腿长168左右,,肚子上有一个花,皮肤白晣嫩滑 【颜值相似】:人照相似8.5,颜值是属于那种耐看的,气质/温柔女少妇, 【凶器罩杯】:胸型B+,乳头肉色,整体手感,刚刚好,盈盈一握,自然腺体胸, 【服务总结】:服务还需要各位狠友,多多调教,就是刚下海少妇,听话,温柔,指哪打哪 【个人卫生】:不抽烟,有好多各种漱口水 ,一次性好的那种厚浴巾,事前事后都有陪洗 【时间管理】:开课十分准时,排课宽松,课时是

10 Sept 2026, 12:52 UTC186 viewsread 11 September 2026
Forwarded from @yigeyanxuan001

杭州一哥课堂:https://t.me/yigechat 【老师花名】: #暖暖 【老师I D】: @nuan587 【验证留名】: #阿大 【出击时间】: 9.8 【课室位置】: 东站附近 【喝茶费用】: 500 【高端服务】: 有的打 ✅ 没有打 ❎ 舌吻 ✅ 69 没要 毒龙 ❎ 情绪价值 ✅ 【身材尺寸】:身高 160 体重 54kg 罩杯 C 【个人卫生】:不抽烟|纹身少量 【时间管理】:排课宽松|无催钟 【推荐程度】:主观打分 9 【报告正文】: #课室环境 东站附近小区房,两室一厅,洗浴设施齐全,出入自由无门禁,老师比较讲究,收拾的很整齐,宾至如归的感觉 ----------------- #人之初印象 少妇的模样,东北那旮旯的小娘们,30+的样子,胸大,乳头坚挺,气质上很良家,刚下海的感觉,很有亲和力,姿态放得低,有点害羞,也有点紧张,应该是刚做这行还不太放得开, 喜欢良家感的可冲了,这款真良家 --------

10 Sept 2026, 05:33 UTC226 viewsread 11 September 2026
Forwarded from @yigeyanxuan007Photo

❤️ #暖暖 @nuan389 🤖 #双向 @nua801_bot 📍 #上城区 💰 #500p #900pp 33岁 160m 52kg C杯 #少妇 #良家 #服务好 #大奶 📌 知心姐姐初下海~润的很300p 2名 群内兑换 速来

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @nuan587. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“暖暖朋友圈” (@nuan587), 47 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nuan587.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.