Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Network Warrior

Channel

Network Warrior

@ntwrkchnnl

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

3,673subscribers

+9 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001104517773
TypeChannel
Username@ntwrkchnnl
Created24 February 2017measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live25 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 25 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ntwrkchnnl

Growth

3,6643,6743,6696 August 2026 — 3,664 subscribers6 August 2026 — 3,664 subscribers9 August 2026 — 3,667 subscribers12 August 2026 — 3,669 subscribers16 August 2026 — 3,671 subscribers18 August 2026 — 3,673 subscribers22 August 2026 — 3,674 subscribers25 August 2026 — 3,673 subscribers3,6736 August 202625 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 20 days, net +9. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,663–3,676 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
25 Aug 2026, 21:523,673-1
22 Aug 2026, 13:373,674+1
18 Aug 2026, 20:533,673+2
16 Aug 2026, 04:543,671+2
12 Aug 2026, 17:033,669+2
9 Aug 2026, 23:363,667+3
6 Aug 2026, 04:333,664no change
6 Aug 2026, 02:233,664first reading

Engagement

23 posts held, back to 13 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
18.7%
avg views ÷ 3,673 subscribers
Avg views / post
687
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
7
of 23 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held23 (13 July 20267 August 2026)
Views total4,808
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 22:57 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Advertising

Ad load
21.7%
5 of 23 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
5
posts carrying an erid · 5 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
936
over 5 measured posts
Median views · rest
948
over 18 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. They are printed side by side with the count behind each rather than as a ratio: an ad and an ordinary post are not otherwise matched — for topic, for length, for hour of day — so the gap between them is a description of two groups and not the effect of one being an ad.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2Vtzquu8W5G114 July 202614 July 2026
2Vtzqvy5z8A16 August 20266 August 2026
2Vtzqw16ogE128 July 202628 July 2026
2VtzqwXwRii127 July 202627 July 2026
2VtzqxHE7H4115 July 202615 July 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 13 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 07:02 UTC315 viewsread 7 August 2026

Comcast Xfinity Router vs VPN Router: What You Actually Control https://blog.flashrouters.com/2026/08/04/xfinity-router-vs-vpn-router/

6 Aug 2026, 09:04 UTC422 viewsread 7 August 2026
Advertisementerid 2Vtzqvy5z8APhoto

🔥 Приглашаем на бесплатный открытый вебинар курса «Observability: мониторинг, логирование, трассировка»: «Системы логирования: ELK, EFK или Graylog?» 🗓 Когда: 17 августа, 20:00 (мск) Логи — один из ключевых источников информации о состоянии системы. Но без правильно выбранного инструмента они превращаются в хаотичный поток данных, в котором сложно найти причину проблемы. На вебинаре сравним популярные системы центр

6 Aug 2026, 07:00 UTC457 viewsread 7 August 2026

Understanding the network-as-software transformation https://www.techtarget.com/searchnetworking/tip/Understanding-the-network-as-software-transformation

5 Aug 2026, 07:01 UTC535 viewsread 7 August 2026

Per-VLAN BGP Path Steering with Filter Based Forwarding https://nexthopreachable.com/articles/per-vlan-bgp-path-steering-with-fbf

31 Jul 2026, 07:05 UTC959 viewsread 7 August 2026

The Death of NAT https://packetpushers.net/podcasts/ipv6-buzz/ipb203-the-death-of-nat/

30 Jul 2026, 07:01 UTC≈1,040 viewsread 7 August 2026

Hooray for the sockets interface https://blog.apnic.net/2026/07/28/hooray-for-the-sockets-interface/

29 Jul 2026, 07:03 UTC≈1,080 viewsread 7 August 2026

Building an ISP Access Lab with PPPoE, DPI, and TR-069 https://nexthopreachable.com/articles/isp-dpi-acs

28 Jul 2026, 09:04 UTC936 viewsread 7 August 2026
Advertisementerid 2Vtzqw16ogEPhoto

🔥 Приглашаем на бесплатный открытый вебинар курса «Observability: мониторинг, логирование, трассировка»: «OpenTelemetry — наблюдаемость на блюдечке» 🗓 Когда: 4 августа, 20:00 (мск) Современные распределённые системы требуют мощных инструментов для мониторинга, отслеживания и логирования. OpenTelemetry стала стандартом де-факто в наблюдаемости, обеспечивая единый подход к сбору метрик, логов и трейсов. На вебинаре р

28 Jul 2026, 07:02 UTC701 viewsread 7 August 2026

Is Your ISP Selling Your Browsing History? https://blog.flashrouters.com/2026/07/13/isp-selling-browsing-history/

27 Jul 2026, 11:55 UTC803 viewsread 7 August 2026
Advertisementerid 2VtzqwXwRiiPhoto

🔍Тестовое собеседование с Head of DevOps уже завтра 28 июля(уже завтра!) в 19:00 по мск приходи онлайн на открытое собеседование, чтобы посмотреть на настоящее интервью на Middle DevOps-разработчика. Как это будет: 📂 Александр Хренников, Head of DevOps в KTS с опытом 14+ лет, будет задавать реальные вопросы и задачи разработчику-добровольцу 📂 Александр будет комментировать каждый ответ респондента, чтобы дать понят

27 Jul 2026, 07:02 UTC689 viewsread 7 August 2026

Network jobs watch: Hiring, skills and certification trends https://www.networkworld.com/article/2093749/network-jobs-watch-hiring-skills-and-certification-trends.html

24 Jul 2026, 07:00 UTC948 viewsread 7 August 2026

Governments to enterprises: Improve your router security hygiene https://www.networkworld.com/article/4196484/governments-to-enterprises-improve-your-router-security-hygiene-2.html

Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @ntwrkchnnl. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,504,120 of 1,621,120entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Network Warrior” (@ntwrkchnnl), 3,673 subscribers as measured 25 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ntwrkchnnl.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.