Channel
@ntagroup0
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
23subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001732559854 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ntagroup0 |
| Description | По всем вопросам: @D0DJERyyy |
| Created | 11 February 2022 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ntagroup0 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 12:01 | 23 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:44 | 23 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 11 February 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 May 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
⛔️ ДИМКА DBS DAO СКАМ! Сам Димка https://t.me/dimandbs Его канал https://t.me/bomzhuem Его приватка, которая стала пабликом https://discord.gg/ASmxwSgR Всем привет, парни. Хотел бы вам поведать одну историю, как один из казалось бы уважаемых людей в крипто тусовке, оказался скамером, который кинул один раз точно нас с вами, может даже дважды (но железных пруфов нет), и как оказалось, кидал и других. DBS DAO был о…
Кому верить: проекту с тир1 фондами или Дима с сильным авторитетом? Один из факторов, которые меня смутили, я горел желанием разъебать лай арт, я готов был в твиттер всем партнерам и инвесторам проекта писать о скаме и инфлы были готовы запушить скам, но Дима убедительно топил за то, чтобы я перестал суетиться, ведь уже ничего не сделать. Хоть пруфов и нет, но все же есть мысль, что Дима и тут скаманул. Я думаю, что…
СУИ ПРЕСС Ф
Прогноз тех кому не дали нихуя: 0.2-0.3$ Прогноз тех кому дали не очень много: 2-3$ Прогноз тех кому дали дохера: 1$
Photo, posted without a caption
А вы не знали чтоли? Быстро покупайте!!!!
Я анонсирую токен $ARB. Листинг завтра
🔵 Coinbase анонсировали свою Layer2 сеть при поддержке всей сети. Ура!
КАЖДЫЙ МОГ БЛЯТЬ ОПЯТЬ, ПРОСТО ЛЕЖАААААТЬ!!!!!! ЖДЕМ АРБИТРУМ https://community.optimism.io/docs/governance/airdrop-2/#
ПО ПОВОДУ АРБИТРУМА: БОЛИШНСТВО ПРОТОКОЛОВ, КОТОРЫЕ ЗАПОСТИЛИ "MONDAY" В ТВИТТЕРЕ НЕ ПОДДЕРЖИВАЮТ ARBITRUM НА СЧЕТ КОНФЕРЕНЦИИ: Я ЧТО-ТО ВООБЩЕ НЕ УВИДЕЛ ИНФОРМАЦИИ НА СЧЕТ УЧАСТИЯ АРБИТРУМА. ВСЕ УВИДИЛИ ГОВНО-ПОСТ В ТВИТТЕРЕ И ПОШЛИ РАСПРОСТРАНЯТЬ НЕПРОВЕРЕННУЮ ИНФУ. НО Я НЕ ОТРИЦАЮ ТОГО, ЧТО ВСЕ ТАКИ В ПОНЕДЕЛЬНИК ЧТО-ТО БУДЕТ. ВЫВОД: ПРОВЕРЯЙТЕ ИНФОРМАЦИЮ САМИ, ПОЖАЛУЙСТА, СНАЧАЛА ИНФА О СНАПШОТЕ ZKSYNC, ТЕПЕР…
Photo, posted without a caption
Самое время свапать Axelar
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @ntagroup0. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@ntagroup0 named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“NTA GROUP” (@ntagroup0), 23 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ntagroup0.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.