selebgram tiktok mawar cantik nih pul3n banget https://t.me/videobokepindohijabterbaru_bot?start=aWQtNTk0NDQyODY1MTAxOTk1MA GRUP VVIP FULL DURASI TANPA LINK/BOT TINGGAL NONTON ‼️ https://t.me/testivvipabel/5

Channel
LESUH
@nsnsmdkkf
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry
113,272subscribers
+832 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003126807846 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @nsnsmdkkf |
| Created | 11 December 2025 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/nsnsmdkkf |
Topic
Adult — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 08:16 | 113,272 | +247 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 21:23 | 113,025 | +364 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 09:24 | 112,661 | +191 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 09:02 | 112,470 | +30 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 06:15 | 112,440 | first reading |
Engagement
45 posts held, back to 11 December 2025 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 9 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 0.937%
- avg views ÷ 113,272 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,060
- 41 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.017%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 41
- of 45 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 41 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 16 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 45 (11 December 2025 – 16 August 2026) |
| Views total | 43,520 |
| Reactions total | 2 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 16 Aug 2026, 07:44 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
59 reactions across 5 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 67.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 40 | 67.8% | |
| 👍 | 7 | 11.9% | |
| 🔥 | 5 | 8.47% | |
| 🎉 | 2 | 3.39% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 3.39% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 3.39% | |
| 🍌 | 1 | 1.69% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 45 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 59reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 45 most recent posts we hold, published 11 December 2025 to 16 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
HIJABERS SKENA LATIHAN W#T PAKE GULING SAMA B0T0L SKINCARE https://t.me/GheaWidyanata_bot?start=Z2V0LTUxMjkxNDQ5OTY2ODIxNzk GRUP VVIP FULL DURASI TANPA LINK/BOT TINGGAL NONTON ‼️ https://t.me/testivvipabel/5
Yang lagi Vir4l banget terbaru vel baju pramuka full percakapan durasi 19mnt https://t.me/video_bokep_viral_lokal_Indo_bot?start=aWQtNTkzODQwNTkyNjk1NjEwMA GRUP VVIP FULL DURASI TANPA LINK/BOT TINGGAL NONTON ‼️ https://t.me/testivvipabel/5
Video yang lagi viral banget anak tetangga di paksa ful percakapan durasi 19mnt https://t.me/Video_viral_bokep_indo1_bot?start=aWQtNTg4NjIwODk4NTA2OTQwMA GRUP VVIP FULL DURASI TANPA LINK/BOT TINGGAL NONTON ‼️ https://t.me/testivvipabel/5
Video yang lagi viral an#k sek#lah di g#ngbang sama gurunya https://t.me/video_bokep_jepang_subs_indo_bot?start=aWQtNTk0MjQyMTA3NjMzMjAwMA GRUP VVIP FULL DURASI TANPA LINK/BOT TINGGAL NONTON ‼️ https://t.me/testivvipabel/5
NG3NT#TIN AD1K IPAR KU PAS M4LEM² LAGI S4NGE BGT https://t.me/tigaajebot?start=Z2V0LTgwNzc2MDY3ODM3MzI5ODA GRUP VVIP FULL DURASI TANPA LINK/BOT TINGGAL NONTON ‼️ https://t.me/testivvipabel/5
PRANK OJOL MAIN SAMA SUSTER CANTIK YANG HYP#R BANGET, https://t.me/dinobiruviralidbot?start=Z2V0LTY4MTg5NzE0NzgzMjQ0MA GRUP VVIP FULL DURASI TANPA LINK/BOT TINGGAL NONTON ‼️ https://t.me/testivvipabel/5
GAK NYANGKA BANGET TERNYATA PACAR KU JAGO BANGET GOYANGAN NYA, MANA PU4S BANGET LANGUSNG https://t.me/pororomediabot?start=Z2V0LTYyMDU4MDQ4MTQ2NzAwNw GRUP VVIP FULL DURASI TANPA LINK/BOT TINGGAL NONTON ‼️ https://t.me/testivvipabel/5
DISURUH DATENG KE RUMAH KAKA IPAR BUAT NEMENIN PAS SUAMI NYA LAGI PERGI https://t.me/lopycute_bot?start=Z2V0LTM1MTk1MDg5Nzg3ODE2NA GRUP VVIP FULL DURASI TANPA LINK/BOT TINGGAL NONTON ‼️ https://t.me/testivvipabel/5
94D1S C4NTIK SI RAMBUT MERAH YANG T#BRUT https://t.me/MEDIASPONGEBOB_BOT?start=Z2V0LTE5NDQzMjIxNTAxMjk2NzE GRUP VVIP FULL DURASI TANPA LINK/BOT TINGGAL NONTON ‼️ https://t.me/testivvipabel/5
SK#NDAL MIA ANDINI VC5 SAMA PAK GURU DEMI NILAI BAGUS https://t.me/VIDEYVIRALiBOT?start=Z2V0LTExMzQ0NDE3MjkzNjkxNQ GRUP VVIP FULL DURASI TANPA LINK/BOT TINGGAL NONTON ‼️ https://t.me/testivvipabel/5
SK4NDAL TERBARU❗️SELEB TIKTOK CACA CHANA N93NT*T SAMA TEMEN https://t.me/PEMERSATUBANGSAREALBOT?start=Z2V0LTgxMTg4NTA0NTI0MjU1MA GRUP VVIP FULL DURASI TANPA LINK/BOT TINGGAL NONTON ‼️ https://t.me/testivvipabel/5
Showing the 12 most recent of 45 posts we hold for @nsnsmdkkf. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@nsnsmdkkf edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 16 August 2026
- Most recent edit
- 16 August 2026
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,317,724 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@testivvipabel · 19,86129 postsMafiapentol36
@Mafiapentol36bot · 58,7432 postsPemersatu Bangsa Official
@tigaajebot · 83,2822 postsVideo bokep indo hijab
@videobokepindohijabterbaru_bot · 30,1852 posts@asptengahmlm04_bot
@asptengahmlm04_bot · 30,6961 postAster
@ASTERsnbot · 50,4191 postDino asupan telegram
@caritemantelegram10_bot · 74,5601 postASUPAN BANYUWANGI YANG UWES
@dinomerahviralasupanbot · 65,8111 postDINO HITAM 🇮🇩
@DINOVRLV3_BOT · 56,8231 postParlay Diskusi Prediksi Slot Gacor
@DuniaVirallbot · 35,4361 postGhea Widyanata
@GheaWidyanata_bot · 26,7281 post@infopiral04_bot
@infopiral04_bot · 31,6031 postIris
@IRISsnbot · 34,0421 postKlikBotSatu
@KlikSatubot · 30,2731 postDiskusi Prediksi Judis Bola Parlay
@mediaviraltelebot · 27,7451 postPEMERSATU BANGSA VIRAL 🇮🇩
@PEMERSATUBANGSAABOT · 45,3421 postLELAH
@TAUTANLELAHBOT · 47,9601 postvideo bokep Jepang
@video_bokep_jepang_subs_indo_bot · 29,3821 postvideo viral bokep lokal indo
@video_bokep_viral_lokal_Indo_bot · 28,5351 postKumbang Bot
@XKumbangBot · 36,9291 postbubbleegumbot
@xnbubblegumbot · 70,3711 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“LESUH” (@nsnsmdkkf), 113,272 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nsnsmdkkf.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.