Jv sub indo - Dignjot Oleh Pacar Ankku - Riho https://t.me/infopiral04_bot?start=aWQtMjc3NDI4NDA0ODgwNzA5MA GRUP VVIP B0K3P RIBUAN VIDEO TANPA BOT ↪️ t.me/testivipgita/3

Channel
YAPPP
@jejdndndmdkdk
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
119,196subscribers
+241 since we began measuring on 16 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003309536114 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @jejdndndmdkdk |
| Created | 11 December 2025 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 16 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/jejdndndmdkdk |
Topic
Adult — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Aug 2026, 10:47 | 119,196 | +241 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 07:45 | 118,955 | first reading |
Engagement
30 posts held, back to 11 December 2025 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 4 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 1.63%
- avg views ÷ 119,196 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,950
- 18 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.01%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 18
- of 30 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 18 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 30 (11 December 2025 – 17 August 2026) |
| Views total | 35,055 |
| Reactions total | 2 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 17 Aug 2026, 22:09 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 14
- Links
- 14
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 17 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
131 reactions across 12 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 77.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 102 | 77.9% | |
| 👍 | 8 | 6.11% | |
| 🔥 | 7 | 5.34% | |
| 👏 | 6 | 4.58% | |
| 🎉 | 5 | 3.82% | |
| 🥰 | 3 | 2.29% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 30 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 131reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 30 most recent posts we hold, published 11 December 2025 to 17 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
NG3NT#TIN AD1K IPAR KU PAS M4LEM² LAGI S4N93 BGT https://t.me/tigaajebot?start=Z2V0LTgwNzc2MDY3ODM3MzI5ODA GRUP VVIP B0K3P RIBUAN VIDEO TANPA BOT ↪️ t.me/testivipgita/3
tante baju merah merona, di masukin sama supirnya sendiri. https://t.me/AsupanLendir69bot?start=Z2V0LTY1MzUzOTIxNTgzNjU1Ng GRUP VVIP B0K3P RIBUAN VIDEO TANPA BOT ↪️ t.me/testivipgita/3
❤️ SISKAEEE NYEP*NG DIBOKING MU#SIN PEJABAT DAERAH https://t.me/CASSIAsnbot?start=Z2V0LTI1Mzc2MTA5ODY1ODYxNTM GRUP VVIP B0K3P RIBUAN VIDEO TANPA BOT ↪️ t.me/testivipgita/3
gokil bro ini bener bener main di tangga kantor https://t.me/vanillaalatteebot?start=Z2V0LTk4OTU3NzkxMzg3MDM4OTYw GRUP VVIP B0K3P RIBUAN VIDEO TANPA BOT ↪️ t.me/testivipgita/3
❤️ BUNDA MENDESAH KENCANG DI S%D%K SELINGKUHAN MUDA, https://t.me/IRISsnbot?start=Z2V0LTMwNzEwNzA3MDkyNDc3ODQ GRUP VVIP B0K3P RIBUAN VIDEO TANPA BOT ↪️ t.me/testivipgita/3
t#cil gacor bikin ketagihan dengerin des#hannya bikin makin basah. https://t.me/LENDIRPERAWANiBOT?start=Z2V0LTk1OTc2MDE0NjYyMDgzNg GRUP VVIP B0K3P RIBUAN VIDEO TANPA BOT ↪️ t.me/testivipgita/3
ENAK BANGET SEP##NG4N SANTRI H1J4B SAMPE LUMERR CR’T D1MULUT https://t.me/XCapungBot?start=Z2V0LTcxODk5MDY0NzY2MTQwNw GRUP VVIP B0K3P RIBUAN VIDEO TANPA BOT ↪️ t.me/testivipgita/3
D4P3T K0NT3N ALIY4 0M3K 4N4L https://t.me/mediaviraltelebot?start=Z2V0LTIwMDgyODM1MTA4MzU0NTA GRUP VVIP B0K3P RIBUAN VIDEO TANPA BOT ↪️ t.me/testivipgita/3
SK#NDAL PGAWAI BANK, DALEMNYA PINKK BANGET https://t.me/Mafiapentol36bot?start=Z2V0LTM2MTU5MTc4MDQ0NjM2 GRUP VVIP B0K3P RIBUAN VIDEO TANPA BOT ↪️ t.me/testivipgita/3
DISURUH DATENG KE RUMAH KAKA IPAR BUAT NEMENIN https://t.me/lopycute_bot?start=Z2V0LTM1MTk1MDg5Nzg3ODE2NA GRUP VVIP B0K3P RIBUAN VIDEO TANPA BOT ↪️ t.me/testivipgita/3
5K4NDAL MIA ANDINI VC5 SAMA PAK GURU DEMI NILAI BAGUS LONGDUR https://t.me/VIDEYVIRALiBOT?start=Z2V0LTExMzQ0NDE3MjkzNjkxNQ GRUP VVIP B0K3P RIBUAN VIDEO TANPA BOT ↪️ t.me/testivipgita/3
Showing the 12 most recent of 30 posts we hold for @jejdndndmdkdk. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,389,497 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@testivipgita · 19,80628 postsMARS
@LINKMARSBOT · 74,7085 postsPISANG
@LINKPISANGBOT · 73,2144 postsMARKURIUS
@LINKMARKURIUSBOT · 77,0672 postsMafiapentol36
@Mafiapentol36bot · 58,7432 postsPemersatu Bangsa Official
@tigaajebot · 83,0802 postsAsupanLendir69
@AsupanLendir69bot · 37,2691 postCassia
@CASSIAsnbot · 36,5371 post@infopiral04_bot
@infopiral04_bot · 31,5521 postIris
@IRISsnbot · 34,5461 postLENDIR GADIS PERAWAN
@LENDIRPERAWANiBOT · 20,2491 postKEPITING
@LINKKEPITINGBOT · 69,9081 postLOPYCUTEE
@lopycute_bot · 36,4661 postDiskusi Prediksi Judis Bola Parlay
@mediaviraltelebot · 29,2691 postPEMERSATU BANGSA VIRAL 🇮🇩
@PEMERSATUBANGSAABOT · 45,3421 postvanillalatte
@vanillaalatteebot · 64,2961 postVIDEY VIRAL | OFFICIAL
@VIDEYVIRALiBOT · 60,1371 postCapung Bot
@XCapungBot · 37,3811 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“YAPPP” (@jejdndndmdkdk), 119,196 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jejdndndmdkdk.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.