Channel
@npdconfession
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
741subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001905559651 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @npdconfession |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/npdconfession |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 09:12 | 741 | +2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:03 | 739 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:26 | 739 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (3 August 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,442 |
| Reactions total | 261 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 02:03 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
261 reactions across 18 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 57 | 21.8% | |
| 🤝 | 53 | 20.3% | |
| 🙏 | 48 | 18.4% | |
| custom 5017044039686423970 | 27 | 10.3% | |
| 😭 | 24 | 9.20% | |
| 💘 | 19 | 7.28% | |
| 💔 | 18 | 6.90% | |
| custom 5215518451279348684 | 4 | 1.53% | |
| 💯 | 3 | 1.15% | |
| 🔥 | 3 | 1.15% | |
| 😢 | 3 | 1.15% | |
| 🍓 | 2 | 0.766% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 261reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
#тейк﹠. @npdconffBot n @npdcffanon_bot ˚ ⤑Мать отметила мое поступление в "престижный" универ на "престижную" специальность Без меня С какими-то рандомами Ахах бля я проорал Лол, это то же самое, что и отмечать день рождения без именинника, база нарциссоидов (она еще не знает, что я вылечу в первом же семестре с вероятностью в 99%) (я уже устроился грузчиком)
🙏4
Signed ma r fa
#тейк﹠. @npdconffBot n @npdcffanon_bot ˚ ⤑можете поделиться своим опытом, как проходили приемы у психиатра и как вам поставили нрл? я очень боюсь идти на прием, полностью уверенной в том, что у меня именно это рл если я признаюсь в том, что подозреваю его у себя, назовут ли меня типичным подростком который хочет добиться чужого внимания путем давления на жалость мол «ыы у меня рл»
🙏8
Signed ma r fa
#тейк﹠. @npdconffBot n @npdcffanon_bot ˚ ⤑жду не дождусь съехать от своей мамы нахуй она нарцисска и силой своего нарциссического абьюза (шутка) заспавнила нрл уже у меня по итогу в доме два нарцисса только я дефицитарный а она грандиозный мы живем вдвоем она каждый день просто высасывает из меня все соки я не помню когда у меня в последний раз был нарц подъем она тупо убивает меня морально
💔9😢3custom 50170440396864239702🤝1
Signed ma r fa
#тейк﹠. @npdconffBot n @npdcffanon_bot ненавижу, блять, людей, которые несогласны с моим мнением
🤝25
Signed ma r fa
#тейк﹠. @npdconffBot n @npdcffanon_bot ˚ ⤑у кого-то есть ощущение что тейк про то насколько нездоровые отношения между пограничником и наоциссом это эйблист rooted штука? У меня прл + нрл комбо, а у моего партнера нрл, при том, что мы находимся бля на пике рецидива(как бы странно это не звучало, не знаю как сказать) и никто из нас не ходит на терапию, у нас здоровые и прям бля самые здоровые даже отношения. даже ск…
❤12🤝6💯3
Signed ma r fa
#тейк﹠. @npdconffBot n @npdcffanon_bot ˚ ⤑ твкв религия сука очень сложно принимать собственную религиозность потому что с одной стороны я мегаумный научный знаю почему не может этого существовать и могу доказать а с другой стороны ну??? бля я же искренне хочу верить я НИ С КЕМ не могу обсудить свою веру даже с другими членами общины ибо мне попросту нуу нахуй стыдно? потому что это что-то что ПОД маской и чтобы эт…
❤5🤝1
Signed ma r fa
#тейк﹠. @npdconffBot n @npdcffanon_bot ˚ ⤑твкв навязчивые мысли о причинении вреда окружающим когда меня принижают, особенно необоснованно, я одновременно чувствую себя гавном, а одновременно хочу пойти убивать, чтобы доказать свое величие. хочу показать чего я на самом деле стою. и я не знаю пугает ли меня это даже сейчас, как будто это вошло в норму в какой-то мере
custom 50170440396864239707🤝6❤2
Signed ma r fa
#тейк﹠. @npdconffBot n @npdcffanon_bot ˚ ⤑Ребзи, не совсем по теме кф, хотя хз А общем у меня ситуация сюр: я человек с диагностированным нрл, уже полтора года находящийся в терапии И с недавних пор ко мне прилипла девушка с предположительным прл. Она милая, классная, с ней весело и интересно, но дело в том, что она не лечится и даже близко не хочет по нормальному обращаться за помощью. Также она занимается сх а ког…
🙏5custom 50170440396864239704custom 52155184512793486843
Signed ma r fa
#тейк﹠. @npdconffBot n @npdcffanon_bot ˚ ⤑Скачет самооценка то вверх, то вниз. В нижнем состоянии не хочется ничего делать, потому что между мной и людьми получше пропасть. В верхнем состоянии не хочется развиваться, потому что новые знания меня недостойны, я и старыми обойдусь. Кругозор падает. Просыпаюсь в мире, где мои навыки больше не нужны, личность в крахе. Рассказывайте, как с этим справляетесь. Раньше помог…
❤9
Signed ma r fa
этот тип продемонстрировал все черты арл/нрл в первом же сообщении блядь
😭24❤5
Signed м арфа
#тейк﹠. @npdconffBot n @npdcffanon_bot ˚ ⤑чисто вопрос, я нрлшник или у меня просто нарц. травма?? чаще всего, я могу начинать в рандомный момент верить в собственное превосходство, что уже не могу другим людям сопереживать и даже не хочется, иногда в такие моменты я чаще всего творю "дикости", думая что окружающие меня недостаточно замечают и хвалят, также я всю жизнь думаю о том что я заслуживаю большего, чем име…
custom 50170440396864239704❤3🔥2💘1
Signed м арфа
🤨 : а может сделать конкурс на маскота… но всем похуй… хм..
🙏12🍓2💘2❤1🔥1custom 50170440396864239701
Signed м арфа
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @npdconfession. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 985,894 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“npd conf ʚଓ safeplace” (@npdconfession), 741 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/npdconfession.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.