Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

6-palata

@nozimjonov

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

67subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001266197990
TypeChannel
Username@nozimjonov
Created29 November 2019measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/nozimjonov

Growth

676867.56 August 2026 — 68 subscribers10 August 2026 — 68 subscribers15 August 2026 — 67 subscribers6 August 202615 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 8 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 67–68 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 06:2667-1
10 Aug 2026, 00:4668no change
6 Aug 2026, 20:3768first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 17 March 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

53 reactions across 20 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 94.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍5094.3%
👎35.66%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 53reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 17 March 2025 to 10 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

10 Apr 2026, 07:43 UTC138 views4 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @Ikrom_Iskandar_ijodi

ИХТИРО Мен “йўқ”дан “қўй” қилдим, “Йўқ” сўзини тескари ўқиб. “Овсар” – “расво” бўлди. “Нодон” эса... Барибир “нодон”лигича қолди. Икром Искандар

👍4

10 Apr 2026, 07:43 UTC140 views4 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @Ikrom_Iskandar_ijodi

“ИХТИРО”НИНГ ДАВОМИ Эмиш ишқ не фан – наф нечук бўлди андин, билмам, лек – кел, дедим, келмадинг, дилимда сенга айтмоқ бўлган бир роз – зор бўлди... Ким қайғуга берса дош – шод бўлар эмиш-ку охир, мен ошиқ бўлдиму мудом нолон бўлиб қолдим. Икром Искандар

👍4

6 Apr 2026, 07:02 UTC142 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Shunchaki, sun’iy intellektning javobini keltirmoqchiman. Eslatib o‘taman, uning aqli sun’iy: Rasmdagi loyiha vizual jihatdan juda chiroyli va ko‘kalamzorlashtirilgan bo‘lsa-da, zamonaviy urbanistika nuqtai nazaridan shahar markazida bunday yirik ko‘prik va avtomobil bog‘lamasini qurish mutlaqo noto‘g‘ri va eskirgan yondashuv hisoblanadi. Garchi loyiha tashabbuskorlari o‘tkazuvchanlik 130 foizga oshishini ta'kidlas

👍1

28 Feb 2026, 18:38 UTC145 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Qurol kuchi bilan oʻrnatilgan har qanday tartib yoki olingan har qanday qasos vaqtinchalikdir. U faqatgina keyingi, undan-da kattaroq qasos va nafrat tuygʻusini uygʻotadi. Toki, xalqaro munosabatlarda kuch huquqi oʻrniga, huquq kuchi ustuvor boʻlmas ekan, begunoh qurbonlar va fojialar haqidagi xabarlar hammamizni ta’qib qilishda davom etaveradi.

👍1

28 Feb 2026, 18:21 UTC134 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Faylasuflar doimo hokimiyat va axloq oʻrtasidagi ziddiyatni o'rganib kelgan. Makiavelli kuch va davlat manfaatlarini hamma narsadan ustun qoʻygan boʻlsa, Kant kabi gumanistlar adolat va abadiy tinchlik gʻoyasini ilgari surgan. Bugungi kunda kuchlilarning kuchsizlar ustidan oʻz aytganini qildirishi – soʻzsiz gumanizm inqirozidir. Texnologik jihatdan koinotni zabt etayotgan insoniyat, negadir oʻz qon-qardoshlari bilan

👍1

19 Jan 2026, 07:19 UTC173 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Odatda, inflatsiya deganda faqat pulning qadrsizlanishini tushunamiz. Iqtisodiy atama sifatida bu kundalik hayotimizning bir qismi. Lekin, nazarimda, biz e’tibordan chetda qoldirayotgan yanada xavfliroq jarayon bor. Ijtimoiy status inflatsiyasi. Bundan 20-30 yil oldin jamiyatda muvaffaqiyatli inson deb hisoblanish uchun ma’lum bir barqarorlik, o‘z uyiga va ishiga ega bo‘lishning o‘zi yetarli edi. Bugun-chi? Bugungi

👍2

16 Jan 2026, 05:53 UTC156 views4 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Siyosatda eng xavfli narsa hokimiyat o‘z legitimlik manbayini yo‘qotishidir. Diniy elitaning muammosi shundaki, ular hokimiyatni osmondan olamiz deb da’vo qilishadi, lekin yerdagi xalq bu mandatga allaqachon ishonmay qo‘ygan. Teokratiya XXI asrda o‘zining eng katta paradoksiga duch kelyapti. Zamonaviy texnologiyalar, internet va global axborot asrida odamlarni o‘rta asr qonun-qoidalari bilan boshqarib bo‘lmaydi. In

👍3👎1

14 Jan 2026, 09:46 UTC137 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Biz ko‘pincha barqarorlikni eng oliy ne’mat deb bilishga o‘rganib qolganmiz. Siyosiy minbarlarda ham, kundalik suhbatlarda ham tinchlik va osoyishtalik, osmonimiz musaffoligidan keyingi o‘rinda turadigan asosiy talab shu – barqarorlik. Ammo o‘zgarishsiz barqarorlik ko‘pincha stagnatsiyaning niqoblangan ko‘rinishi bo‘lib chiqadi. Paradoks shundaki, jamiyat sifatida biz bir vaqtning o‘zida ham rivojlanishni, ham hayot

👍2

13 Jan 2026, 07:40 UTC126 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026

OAVda ba’zi “siyosatshunos”larning Markaziy Osiyoga nisbatan harbiy ssenariylarni ilgari surgani va mintaqani “o‘z ta’sir doirasi” deb atashganiga ko‘zimiz tushdi. Qayerdadir o‘qigandim, “Resentiment” tushunchasi bor. Buni o‘zining hozirgi holatidan qoniqmaslikni boshqalarni ayblash va o‘tmishni ideallashtirish orqali kompensatsiya qilishga urinish, desak ham bo‘ladi. Imperiya tafakkuri inersiyasi bilan yashayotganl

👍2

13 Jan 2026, 06:00 UTC184 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Falsafiy nuqtayi nazardan, sivilizatsiyani kechiktirilgan rohat mahsuliga o‘xshataman. Masalan, ibtidoiy odam topganini o‘sha zahotiyoq yegan. Sivilizatsiyalashgan inson esa bugungi iste’molni cheklab, ertangi kun uchun jamg‘aradi, sarmoya kiritadi. Iqtisodiyotning fundamental qonunlaridan biri ham shu, kapital jamg‘armasiz o‘sish bo‘lmaydi. Kapital esa bugungi “yo‘q” deya olish qobiliyatimizning natijasidir. Menim

👍2👎1

22 Dec 2025, 12:30 UTC137 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026

“Iqlim o‘zgarishining oqibatlari unga barcha resurslarimizni sarflashimiz va ekokommunizm foydasiga iqtisodiy o‘sishdan voz kechishimiz darajasida qo‘rqinchli emas. Xyumer yozganidek, ancha dolzarbroq muammolar borki, ularga sarflangan har bir dollarning samarasi o‘nlab barobar yuqori bo‘ladi. Masalan, bezgak. Lekin faollar bunday muammolar haqida gapirishni unchalik xushlashmaydi. Ular uchun dunyoni yaxshiroq qilis

👍2

4 Dec 2025, 11:10 UTC147 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Erta nikohlar (ixchamlashtirilgan matn) Yettisuv (Semirechye – hozirgi Qozog‘iston va Qirg‘iziston hududi) Harbiy gubernatori viloyatdagi musulmon aholisi o‘rasida voyaga yetmagan – 12 va 13 yoshli qizlarni turmushga berish holatlari to‘xtamayotganini payqadi. Bunday holatlar ba’zan tasodifan ma’muriyatga ma’lum bo‘lib qolmoqda. Bu holat gubernatorni musulmon aholisiga bunday nikohlarning noqonuniyligini eslatishga

👍2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @nozimjonov. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 559,516 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“6-palata” (@nozimjonov), 67 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nozimjonov.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.