Channel
@novostipip
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
9subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001774677519 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @novostipip |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 18 July 2022— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/novostipip |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 21:06 | 9 | no change |
| 13 Aug 2026, 20:46 | 9 | first reading |
10 posts held, back to 18 July 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 December 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 18 July 2022 to 23 December 2022, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
доброе утро, сегодня менеджер моей подруги делал приход на 10 с каналом https://t.me/temkiuyapq влд @tihkapaerer я решила зайти и посмотреть как добивается приход.после чего спросила у менеджера кто нибудь зашёл от них и зашёл 1 человек (показано на скрине)написав этому человеку, мы выясняли что он зашёл через вз (на скринах все показано) ‼️если не хотите что бы вам добили приход через вз, лучше заблокируйте этого…
Ап! Не добила 10 пд) Юз влд @sliqqw Юз того админа @elliszxs Юз канала https://t.me/wildberriessSik
извините за беспокойство, но я хотела бы сделать ап)) итак это ап на девочку @kittyxrita рассказываю, я была у неё мнд и там была девочка @Myheloll. в итоге они поссорились и рита(@kittyxrita) осталась у неё адм, наступила ночь и рита удалила ей пд. рассказываю про сегодняшний случай. я досих пор была у неё в мнд, ну так вот, у неё кончился пвс и теперь у неё бвс, она сделала в бвс аву и я сказала, что ава получилась…
АНТИ ПИАР ВОРУЮТ РАБОТЫ С ДРУГИХ ТГК (наши тоже) ИХ КАНАЛ: https://t.me/Vils_abg КИДАЕМ ЖАЛОБЫ
НЕ БЕРИТЕ ЕГО В АДМИНЫ/МЕНЕДЖЕРЫ! УДАЛЯЕТ ПД, ВОЗМОЖНО КОМУ-ТО НЕ УДАЛЯЛ,НО ПРУФЫ НА ЭКРАНЕ, МОЯ ПОДРУГА СКАЗАЛА ТО ЧТО ОН ЕСТЬ В ГРУППЕ УДАЛЕНИЯ!!! кратко: хотели взять в мнд,моя подруга/знакомая решила его проверить, проверку он не прошел. его ник: @Copka77 (ап не мой)
❤1
Го новости?
переписки у меня к сожалению нету,но отчетно все помню,эта девочка попросилась к нам в админы,все было хорошо,она общалась вполне как обычный новый админ,через несколько минут моя подруга замечает что стали быстро уходить подписчики,оказалось удаляет нам их эта кристи,удалила нам более 300 подписчиков,прошу не брать в админы людей которые в админах на этом канале канал https://t.me/+CDfuBskztYViYTky ап от @babkaleg…
это мне кинул чел,что они тип добивают вз это уже 4 косяк
и опять канал риты👏
эх, ещё одна наёбщица на приходы..😔 @firuzamkhm
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @novostipip. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,222,922 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@novostipip named 8 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“новости каналов!” (@novostipip), 9 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/novostipip.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.