Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for πŸ”₯πŸ’£ MINES BOOSTER πŸ’£πŸ”₯

Channel

πŸ”₯πŸ’£ MINES BOOSTER πŸ’£πŸ”₯

@novos_milionarios

On this record: Topic Β· Growth Β· Engagement Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Handles named that no longer answer Β· Cite this entry

239subscribers

-27 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001554615333
TypeChannel
Username@novos_milionarios
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 β€” estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 October 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/novos_milionarios

Topic

Gambling & betting β€” a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 23 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured β€” it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

239266252.57 August 2026 β€” 266 subscribers8 August 2026 β€” 266 subscribers13 August 2026 β€” 262 subscribers19 August 2026 β€” 260 subscribers27 August 2026 β€” 256 subscribers4 September 2026 β€” 253 subscribers12 September 2026 β€” 251 subscribers28 September 2026 β€” 245 subscribers9 October 2026 β€” 239 subscribers7 August 20269 October 2026
9 measurements spanning 63 days, net -27. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between β€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean β€œno change observed”, never β€œinterpolated”. The vertical axis spans 235–270 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log β€” every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Oct 2026, 09:40239-6
28 Sept 2026, 10:37245-6
12 Sept 2026, 08:58251-2
4 Sept 2026, 07:01253-3
27 Aug 2026, 04:33256-4
19 Aug 2026, 21:51260-2
13 Aug 2026, 11:26262-4
8 Aug 2026, 09:01266no change
7 Aug 2026, 10:05266first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 9 August 2023 β€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute β€” we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 August 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

33 reactions across 7 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 93.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
πŸ‘3193.9%
πŸ‘13.03%
πŸ’―13.03%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β€” πŸ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β€” 4.34K, 1.2M β€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post β€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β€” those same posts carry 33 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by β€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 August 2023 to 9 August 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2023, 23:07 UTCβ‰ˆ2,530 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026

πŸ”Ή Sinal Finalizado πŸ”Ή πŸ•‘ Finalizado Γ s 20:07 βœ…βœ…βœ…GREENβœ…βœ…βœ… πŸ’Έ RECEBER SINAIS VIP πŸ’Έ @diego_ccosta

πŸ‘14

9 Aug 2023, 23:04 UTCβ‰ˆ2,530 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026

πŸ’° Recomendada R$50,00 πŸ’° πŸ’£ Minas: 3 ⏱ Valido atΓ© as 20:06 πŸ” NΒΊ de tentativas: 3 πŸ”—BΓ”NUS de boas-vindas de 200% πŸ”—Link de cadastro no site correto 🟦 🟦 ⭐ ⭐ 🟦 🟦 🟦 🟦 🟦 🟦 🟦 🟦 🟦 🟦 🟦 🟦 🟦 🟦 ⭐ 🟦 🟦 🟦 🟦 ⭐ ⭐ πŸ’Έ RECEBER SINAIS VIP πŸ’Έ @diego_ccosta

πŸ‘11

9 Aug 2023, 23:00 UTCβ‰ˆ2,410 viewsread 8 August 2026

πŸ”Ή Sinal Finalizado πŸ”Ή πŸ•‘ Finalizado Γ s 20:00 βœ…βœ…βœ…GREENβœ…βœ…βœ… πŸ’Έ RECEBER SINAIS VIP πŸ’Έ @diego_ccosta

9 Aug 2023, 22:58 UTCβ‰ˆ2,110 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

πŸ’° Recomendada R$50,00 πŸ’° πŸ’£ Minas: 4 ⏱ Valido atΓ© as 20:00 πŸ” NΒΊ de tentativas: 3 πŸ”—BΓ”NUS de boas-vindas de 200% πŸ”—Link de cadastro no site correto 🟦 🟦 🟦 🟦 ⭐ 🟦 🟦 ⭐ ⭐ 🟦 🟦 ⭐ 🟦 🟦 🟦 ⭐ 🟦 🟦 🟦 🟦 🟦 ⭐ 🟦 🟦 🟦 πŸ’Έ RECEBER SINAIS VIP πŸ’Έ @diego_ccosta

πŸ‘4

9 Aug 2023, 22:54 UTCβ‰ˆ1,660 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

πŸ”Ή Sinal Finalizado πŸ”Ή πŸ•‘ Finalizado Γ s 19:54 βœ…βœ…βœ…GREENβœ…βœ…βœ… πŸ’Έ RECEBER SINAIS VIP πŸ’Έ @diego_ccosta

πŸ‘1

9 Aug 2023, 22:52 UTCβ‰ˆ1,490 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

πŸ’° Recomendada R$50,00 πŸ’° πŸ’£ Minas: 4 ⏱ Valido atΓ© as 19:54 πŸ” NΒΊ de tentativas: 3 πŸ”—BΓ”NUS de boas-vindas de 200% πŸ”—Link de cadastro no site correto 🟦 🟦 🟦 🟦 🟦 ⭐ 🟦 🟦 🟦 🟦 🟦 🟦 🟦 🟦 ⭐ ⭐ 🟦 🟦 ⭐ 🟦 ⭐ 🟦 🟦 🟦 🟦 πŸ’Έ RECEBER SINAIS VIP πŸ’Έ @diego_ccosta

πŸ‘1

9 Aug 2023, 22:48 UTCβ‰ˆ1,190 viewsread 8 August 2026

πŸ”Ή Sinal Finalizado πŸ”Ή πŸ•‘ Finalizado Γ s 19:48 βœ…βœ…βœ…GREENβœ…βœ…βœ… πŸ’Έ RECEBER SINAIS VIP πŸ’Έ @diego_ccosta

9 Aug 2023, 22:46 UTCβ‰ˆ1,020 viewsread 8 August 2026

πŸ’° Recomendada R$50,00 πŸ’° πŸ’£ Minas: 4 ⏱ Valido atΓ© as 19:48 πŸ” NΒΊ de tentativas: 3 πŸ”—BΓ”NUS de boas-vindas de 200% πŸ”—Link de cadastro no site correto 🟦 🟦 🟦 ⭐ 🟦 ⭐ 🟦 🟦 🟦 ⭐ 🟦 🟦 🟦 🟦 ⭐ ⭐ ⭐ 🟦 🟦 🟦 🟦 🟦 🟦 🟦 🟦 πŸ’Έ RECEBER SINAIS VIP πŸ’Έ @diego_ccosta

9 Aug 2023, 22:42 UTC658 viewsread 8 August 2026

πŸ”Ή Sinal Finalizado πŸ”Ή πŸ•‘ Finalizado Γ s 19:42 βœ…βœ…βœ…GREENβœ…βœ…βœ… πŸ’Έ RECEBER SINAIS VIP πŸ’Έ @diego_ccosta

9 Aug 2023, 22:39 UTC589 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

πŸ’° Recomendada R$50,00 πŸ’° πŸ’£ Minas: 4 ⏱ Valido atΓ© as 19:41 πŸ” NΒΊ de tentativas: 3 πŸ”—BΓ”NUS de boas-vindas de 200% πŸ”—Link de cadastro no site correto 🟦 🟦 🟦 🟦 ⭐ 🟦 🟦 🟦 ⭐ 🟦 ⭐ 🟦 🟦 🟦 ⭐ 🟦 🟦 🟦 🟦 🟦 ⭐ 🟦 🟦 🟦 🟦 πŸ’Έ RECEBER SINAIS VIP πŸ’Έ @diego_ccosta

πŸ’―1

9 Aug 2023, 22:35 UTC459 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

πŸ”Ή Sinal Finalizado πŸ”Ή πŸ•‘ Finalizado Γ s 19:35 βœ…βœ…βœ…GREENβœ…βœ…βœ… πŸ’Έ RECEBER SINAIS VIP πŸ’Έ @diego_ccosta

πŸ‘1

9 Aug 2023, 22:33 UTC430 viewsread 8 August 2026

πŸ’° Recomendada R$50,00 πŸ’° πŸ’£ Minas: 4 ⏱ Valido atΓ© as 19:35 πŸ” NΒΊ de tentativas: 3 πŸ”—BΓ”NUS de boas-vindas de 200% πŸ”—Link de cadastro no site correto 🟦 🟦 🟦 🟦 🟦 ⭐ 🟦 🟦 🟦 🟦 ⭐ 🟦 🟦 🟦 ⭐ 🟦 🟦 🟦 🟦 🟦 🟦 🟦 🟦 ⭐ 🟦 πŸ’Έ RECEBER SINAIS VIP πŸ’Έ @diego_ccosta

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @novos_milionarios. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 October 2026 β€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

β€œπŸ”₯πŸ’£ MINES BOOSTER πŸ’£πŸ”₯” (@novos_milionarios), 239 subscribers as measured 9 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/novos_milionarios.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.