Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Новокаин для души

Channel

Новокаин для души

@novocaine4soul

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

7,756subscribers

+55 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001772589565
TypeChannel
Username@novocaine4soul
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/novocaine4soul

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 61% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

7,6607,7567,7087 August 2026 — 7,701 subscribers7 August 2026 — 7,701 subscribers10 August 2026 — 7,699 subscribers14 August 2026 — 7,696 subscribers17 August 2026 — 7,676 subscribers20 August 2026 — 7,660 subscribers24 August 2026 — 7,689 subscribers27 August 2026 — 7,682 subscribers29 August 2026 — 7,685 subscribers1 September 2026 — 7,690 subscribers5 September 2026 — 7,711 subscribers10 September 2026 — 7,715 subscribers18 September 2026 — 7,756 subscribers7 August 202618 September 2026
13 measurements spanning 42 days, net +55. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,646–7,770 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 11:377,756+41
10 Sept 2026, 12:197,715+4
5 Sept 2026, 11:017,711+21
1 Sept 2026, 20:427,690+5
29 Aug 2026, 20:327,685+3
27 Aug 2026, 06:187,682-7
24 Aug 2026, 07:577,689+29
20 Aug 2026, 05:337,660-16
17 Aug 2026, 10:287,676-20
14 Aug 2026, 02:367,696-3
10 Aug 2026, 20:477,699-2
7 Aug 2026, 10:107,701no change
7 Aug 2026, 05:327,701first reading

Engagement

21 posts held, back to 17 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
21.8%
avg views ÷ 7,756 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,690
1 post measured
Reaction rate
24.6%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 21 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 August 2026
Posts held21 (17 June 2026 – 27 August 2026)
Views total1,690
Reactions total416
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken28 Aug 2026, 21:04 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2h 10m
Average length
43m 39s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

3,839 reactions across 18 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤‍🔥1,72044.8%
custom 544950595028307847473519.1%
custom 525846853655620985541410.8%
😁3098.05%
custom 52357183911420356781634.25%
💔1383.59%
💯1012.63%
custom 5235807206770750407992.58%
🥰571.48%
😍230.599%
🌚210.547%
🫡190.495%
🤓180.469%
🕊150.391%
🙏70.182%

Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,839 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 17 June 2026 to 27 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

27 Aug 2026, 04:58 UTC≈1,690 views416 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Уныние В коллективных процессах всегда есть тренды, которые можно разглядеть. В одежде, в образовании, в спорте, в политике — да во всех сферах. По аналогии, есть тренды психические. И анализ позволяет их замечать и исследовать. Обычно, в зависимости от происходящих коллективных процессов, можно заметить некий ведущий аффект в обществе. В 2020 году, когда появился ковид, это был страх. Когда началась война в 2022 го…

❤‍🔥224custom 5449505950283078474110custom 525846853655620985549🕊14🌚11💔6🫡1custom 52357183911420356781

25 Aug 2026, 18:22 UTC≈1,980 views115 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

В инстаграме (ура, теперь можно не писать, что он запрещен в РФ, ведь и телеграм запрещён!)* эти истории вызвали большой отклик. Кто-то написал, что уже сходил на выставку. Я радуюсь. И делюсь с вами тоже. Исследование культурных аспектов сознания и бессознательного — очень важное и интересное (лично для меня) направление в юнгианском анализе. Много интересного про это я рассказываю в лекции «Культурная идентичность …

❤‍🔥89🥰10custom 54495059502830784749custom 52357183911420356786💯1

21 Aug 2026, 20:14 UTC≈2,960 views256 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Меня в детстве завораживала сказка Андерсена про Оле-Лукойе, волшебника, который показывал детям сны. Он приходил ночью в комнату, и брызгал ребёнку на затылок молоком из спринцовки, чтобы усыпить. А потом раскрывал над ним зонт, который показывал сновидения. Был зонт с хорошими, приятными снами, и зонт с кошмарами. И вот видите, что из этого вышло, теперь на работе сны каждый день анализирую. На самом деле, тема сно…

custom 5258468536556209855139❤‍🔥76custom 544950595028307847427🫡12🌚2

21 Aug 2026, 06:41 UTC≈2,710 views339 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Сегодняшней подборкой пятничных мемов хочу напомнить вам несколько важных вещей. Думаю, не ошибусь, предположив, что именно сегодня кому-то откажется важно это прочитать. 1. Наш опыт очень субъективен, и окрашен в те тона, в которые позволила его окрасить наша внутренняя система. А именно: родительские комплексы, принятые в привычном нам обществе взгляды, и так далее. 2. Можно перекрасить. 3. Перекрасить можно в л…

❤‍🔥215custom 525846853655620985571💯25custom 523571839114203567815custom 54495059502830784749🫡3😁1

19 Aug 2026, 16:26 UTC≈2,630 views222 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Тема агрессии и аутоагрессии вызвала много откликов. У меня есть и другие материалы по этой теме. Повторю свой пост 2024 года, в котором они были все собраны, и добавлю новые, которые появились за это время. Если вам окажется полезно, дайте знать (мне будет приятно). Леонид Александрович Китаев-Смык, выдающийся советский врач, писал в своих воспоминаниях вот о чём. Врачи травматологического отделения НИИ Склифосовс…

custom 5449505950283078474108❤‍🔥61custom 523571839114203567825custom 523580720677075040710custom 525846853655620985510🫡3💯2😍2

18 Aug 2026, 11:07 UTC≈2,660 views115 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Каждый год в честь Дня знаний на последней неделе августа я делаю «распродажу» лекций. Почему распродажа в кавычках? Потому что, вообще, я не снижаю цен на лекции, так как они не теряют актуальности. Но раз в год даю возможность приобрести их пакетом: сразу несколько лекций, и тогда получается приятная скидка. Обычно «пакеты» по темам составляю я, и вы можете выбрать из существующих, например: набор лекций про кризис…

❤‍🔥78custom 544950595028307847425🤓12

18 Aug 2026, 05:21 UTC≈2,710 views376 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Аутоагрессия Начну с вопроса. Знаете ли и понимаете ли вы, что аутоагрессия (осознанное или неосознанное причинение вреда самому себе) проявляется не только в виде самоповреждающего поведения (что очевидно)? Но и в виде кусания щёк изнутри, ковыряния ногтей, выхода на работу с температурой, изнурительных тренировок и диет, увлечения инвазивными и оперативными методами в косметологии (инъекции, операции, болезненные …

❤‍🔥211💔84custom 544950595028307847469🌚4custom 52357183911420356784💯3😍1

16 Aug 2026, 18:19 UTC≈2,300 views102 reactionsread 25 August 2026
Voice message

«Запределье»: разбор фильма часть 1

❤‍🔥60custom 544950595028307847417custom 523571839114203567815custom 52584685365562098556custom 52358072067707504074

16 Aug 2026, 18:19 UTC≈2,250 views96 reactionsread 25 August 2026
Voice message

«Запределье»: разбор фильма часть 2

❤‍🔥61custom 523571839114203567815custom 525846853655620985514custom 52358072067707504075🤓1

16 Aug 2026, 18:19 UTC≈2,300 views95 reactionsread 25 August 2026
Photo

Разбор фильма «Запределье». Кажется, его ещё можно успеть посмотреть в кинотеатре 👇 👇 👇

❤‍🔥62custom 523571839114203567814custom 525846853655620985511😍8

26 Jul 2026, 07:01 UTC≈3,380 views133 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Video

Летний эфир 2026 Августовская «распродажа» лекций // Россия и стыд // оскорбляет ли Юнга популярность его идей // что такое эмпатия // тренды коллективных процессов // почему «тянет к земле» // аналитическое напутствие для 20-летних // конфликт между индивидуацией и ответственностью перед родителями // радость и уныние// какие существуют треки изучения аналитической психологии Эти и другие темы в свежей записи сезо…

❤‍🔥97custom 544950595028307847432😍4

Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @novocaine4soul. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Инпсихо | Медиа Московского Института Психоанализа
@Inpsycho · 31,398
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 6 September 2026
Анастасия Кужовник | Фитнес-тренер
@anastasiia_kuzhovnik · 24,873
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 15 September 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Новокаин для души” (@novocaine4soul), 7,756 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/novocaine4soul.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.