Channel
@novg_by
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
207subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003780423330 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @novg_by |
| Created | 11 March 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/novg_by |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 00:28 | 207 | -3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 03:45 | 210 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:18 | 210 | first reading |
6 posts held, back to 11 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 6 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
104 reactions across 5 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 47 | 45.2% | |
| 👍 | 39 | 37.5% | |
| 🔥 | 9 | 8.65% | |
| ❤🔥 | 6 | 5.77% | |
| 🤝 | 3 | 2.88% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 104reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 11 March 2026 to 13 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Нам не обязательно становиться вайбкодерами, пилить SaaS, срочно учиться кодить или искать работу. Да собственно вообще не обязательно что-то делать, чтобы доказывать себе, что вы работаете или что-то стоите. (при условии, что у вас осталось хоть что-то после этих нарисованных циферок на экране) Если вы уже уверовали, что в крипте вам больше делать нечего, то знайте вы не одни. Кажется, таких сейчас много. И у эт…
❤23🔥9❤🔥6👍1
Ура обнова для Funding History Search Нововведения: - Уведы в Telegram боте. Вы можете легко поставить уведомления об изменении цены, перекоса фандинга и делиста токена. Более подробно можно почитать в гайд меню бота. Чтобы связать свое портфолио токенов и телеграм бота нужно тыкнуть на иконку колокольчика 🔔 справа вверху. Подключение телеги не требуется. Перекос фандинга может отображаться некорректно от биржи к …
👍12🤝3❤1
По традиции всех криптопроектов - несколько коннекторов бирж упали. Hyperliquid, extended, ethereal и возможно уже другие пока в ауте. Завтра постараюсь наладить. p.s. спасибо братишке ламеру за репост
❤10👍2
Начнем со вторичного. Funding History Search. Такое оригинальное название.... Это такой сайт для поиска токенов с долгосрочным/историческим фандингом. Зачем? Все мы знаем, что такое фандинги и почему лонги платят шортам и наоборот. Мы даже знаем, что на этом можно зарабатывать. И вот один из самых ленивых это открыть позицию дельта-нейтральную на паре бирж и сидеть с кайфом лутать фандинги неделю. Однако как найти…
👍24❤5
Приветствие. Метаясь между тематиками канала - от сухого и усредненного собственного нейро-крипто слóва до честного и чистого графоманства эмоций крипты, решил: в пизду, пусть будь, что будет. Годами друзья уговаривали сделать канал о том или о сем, аргументируя монетизацией, репутацией, отдушиной. Все это хорошо и приятно до первой смены климата в нашем криптополе: то иди леерзиру крути, то трампкоин купи. Не хоте…
❤8
Channel created
Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @novg_by. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,083,556 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Novg By” (@novg_by), 207 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/novg_by.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.