Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Nova beads

@novabeads

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Declared links · Cite this entry

418subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002411460400
TypeChannel
Username@novabeads
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/novabeads

Growth

418419418.58 Aug 2026, 10:47 — 419 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 06:42 — 418 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 10:479 Aug 2026, 06:42
2 measurements taken within a single day, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 418–419 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 06:42418-1
8 Aug 2026, 10:47419first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 1 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
8s
Average length
8s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

355 reactions across 11 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
19454.6%
🥰3810.7%
❤‍🔥329.01%
🔥318.73%
😨143.94%
💘133.66%
👍102.82%
💅61.69%
🤩41.13%
😁30.845%
🙏30.845%
😍20.563%
🍓10.282%
🎉10.282%
💯10.282%
🤯10.282%
🦄10.282%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 355reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 1 March 2026 to 3 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
4
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 11 we hold a reading for · 18%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @novabeads. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 11 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 March 2026 to 3 May 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

3 May 2026, 11:26 UTC600 views36 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Не могла не сделать кастом под брелок «Милый медведь» из Resident Evil🧸 Этой весной вышла 9-я часть игры, в которой брелок Ады появился опять. Только ради него появилась доп. схема на машущую лапу, которую я дарю всем покупателям схемы на медвежонка Решила оставить бант, а не делать бабочку, как у оригинала. Получилось не один в один, но как минимум похоже. Теперь он мой фаворит среди медвежат🫶 На втором фото — ми

22🥰6💅3😁3🔥1😍1

2 May 2026, 14:30 UTC605 views30 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Оформила такие брелки💙💜 Давно хотела сделать двойные бантики, как в Пинтерест, и откладывала бы это ещё млн лет, но медвежата заставили взяться Не стала рисковать и плести их леской (было, что она рвалась об острые грани бусин), поэтому сплела проволокой 0,25 мм. Не понравилось — бант получился жёстким, и проволока оставила тёмные пятна на бусинах из аквамарина. В итоге сплела на ювелирном тросике. Использую его в

16🔥7🥰5💘1🦄1

1 May 2026, 19:05 UTC583 views30 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

С праздником весны и труда!🌸 А вот и результаты совместного плетения Мини-медвежонка 🧸 У меня сердце радуется, когда смотрю на то, с какими разными идеями и исполнением созданы эти медвежата💘 Спасибо за участие! Май уже начался тепло и красиво с вами: @Eva_Ger19 @Leroy_but_not_Merlin_Wayne_MMM @moon_tail @KutyKatt @luvisor @Vlashich57 @mariana2882 @elelexel @zhmlife @salt_and_shine @OLEAandBiser @Youli_beads @kit_

18❤‍🔥6🔥4💘1💯1

2 Apr 2026, 08:13 UTC≈4,300 views51 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Набор в СП на Мини-медвежонка Период СП: со 2 по 30 апреля Условия: 1. Подписаться на мой канал @novabeads 2. Купить схему на Мини-медвежонка (стоимость схемы — 200 руб.) 3. Поделиться этим постом у себя в канале или отправить 3 друзьям 4. Отправить скрины подписки и репоста мне в ЛС и написать “Хочу в СП” Бонус СП: схема на заячьи ушки и крепление ног “стоя”. Бонус получают все, кто успел сплести медвежонка и заг

28😨14❤‍🔥4🤩4🙏1

2 Apr 2026, 08:10 UTC≈1,090 views26 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

УРА! Это продажа схемы на Мини-медвежонка🧸 Стоимость: 200 руб. Для покупки писать: @novavea Медвежонок в технике мозаичного плетения бисером Preciosa 10/0. Схема пошаговая и подойдёт даже тем, кто будет плести мозаикой впервые. Подробнее о схеме и оплате — в картиночках⬆️ Если есть вопросы, пишите в комментариях или в ЛС🫶

21🥰3🙏2

27 Mar 2026, 14:23 UTC≈1,020 views43 reactions2 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Привет! Вот медвеже-заячье семейное фото, пока ждём начало продажи схемы🧸❤️🐇 Да, я тоже жду - сейчас пытаюсь организовать способ приёма платежей. Надеюсь, всё получится и в ближайшие дни будет продажа P.S. Думаю было бы здорово устроить СП, чтобы вместе разбирать вопросы и делиться процессами. И бонус за СП уже готов: это будет схема на заячьи ушки и крепление ножек стоя (как на фото)

❤‍🔥2116🥰5🍓1

23 Mar 2026, 15:06 UTC≈1,420 views33 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Привет🫶 Вот и итоги тестирования мини-медвежонка🧸 Среди тестировщиков были те, у кого уже есть опыт в мозаичном плетении, и те, кто пробовал эту технику впервые, но у них получились такие милые медвежата. Ошибки были найдены, и даже предложены идеи для улучшения (ошибки исправлены, а предложения приняты и внедрены). Всем тестировщикам большое спасибо за участие, проделанную работу и предложения! +10 к навыку мозаи

21🔥7🥰3💅2

11 Mar 2026, 18:51 UTC≈1,110 views25 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Отбор проведён, ссылки отправлены🎉 Если вы не попали, ни в коем случае не расстраиваться! Для вас будет скидка на схему🫶

🥰157👍3

7 Mar 2026, 21:10 UTC≈1,290 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Если есть вопросы, задавайте тут👋😺

👍64

7 Mar 2026, 21:09 UTC≈4,010 views32 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Набор в тест на Мини-медвежонка🧸 Медвежонок в технике МОЗАИЧНОГО плетения бисером Preciosa 10/0. Схема пошаговая и подойдёт даже новичкам Условия 1. Быть подписанным на мой канал @novabeads 2. Переслать этот пост к себе на канал. Если канала нет, переслать 3 друзьям 3. Скинуть скрины с подтверждением 1 и 2 пунктов 4. Скинуть фото 4 ваших лучших работ (в любой технике, можно амигуруми, если есть мозаичным плетением,

20💘10🔥2

1 Mar 2026, 10:31 UTC≈1,250 views39 reactions2 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Та-дам! Моя авторская работа🎉 Медвежонок в технике мозаичного плетения бисером Preciosa. Каждая часть его тела переделывалась по миллиону раз, даже набралась коробочка «тестовых» медвежат. Очень хотелось сплести какую-нибудь маленькость и чтоб не было видно наполнитель (подбор наполнителя и его цвета стал для меня стрессом). Теперь у меня стол в медвежатах. Одного буду носить как брелок, несколько будут сидеть на

21🔥10❤‍🔥1🎉1👍1💅1💘1🤯1

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @novabeads. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 296,525 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Nova beads” (@novabeads), 418 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/novabeads.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.