Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Nourishé archive

Channel

Nourishé archive

@nourishearcv

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

21subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 14 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003600232112
TypeChannel
Username@nourishearcv
CreatedBetween 1 December 2025 and 8 March 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded14 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/nourishearcv

Growth

2114 Aug 2026, 22:16 — 21 subscribers15 Aug 2026, 18:37 — 21 subscribers14 Aug 2026, 22:1615 Aug 2026, 18:37
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 20–22 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 18:3721no change
14 Aug 2026, 22:1621first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 8 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

7 reactions across 2 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 71.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
571.4%
❤‍🔥228.6%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 March 2026 to 3 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 19 we hold a reading for · 11%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @nourishearcv. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 8 March 2026 to 3 April 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Advertising

Ad load
5.00%
1 of 20 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
166
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
178
over 18 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
20260325101214859715010300166963270717267125 March 202625 March 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 March 2026 to 3 April 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

27 Mar 2026, 13:51 UTC156 views3 reactions2 Starsread 14 August 2026

NOURISHE PROMO NETFLIK STRONG ACC • 1U 1D : 1.400 • 1U 2D : 2.100 • 1U 3D : 4.600 • 1U 1W : 7.900 • 1U 1B : 15.100 • 2U 1D : 1.300 • 2U 3D : 3.600 • 2U 1W : 7.400 • 2U 1B : 10.100 SEMIPRIVATE • 1D : 2.600 • 3D : 7.100 • 1W : 9.600 • 1B : 19.100-28.500 CAPCUT cc shar 7day 600p priv 1k cc shar 1b 2k priv 3k AM am 1y gene 200p viu 1y 300p STARS VIA GIFT 15s : 3.200 Promo : 28 Maret - 2 April

❤‍🔥21

25 Mar 2026, 10:58 UTC166 viewsread 14 August 2026
Advertisementerid 20260325101214859715010300166963270717267

Aku lagi sebar DANA Kaget nih! Yuk, sikat segera sebelum melayang 💸💸💸 https://link.dana.id/danakaget?c=sglcuqfpd&r=dZeccO&orderId=20260325101214859715010300166963270717267

8 Mar 2026, 16:02 UTC416 views4 reactions1 Starread 14 August 2026

ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ amid the saccharine hush of velvet dusk, there abides a warmth that tempers itself 𑣿 it polished by silence within ebon grace. it is akin to a raven hymn and a midnight sonnet, honest-review from customer. 🪽 auto-copy: perfectly ten out of ten or infinite, because everything fits perfectly with what i need, and also the way the admin handles it is really smooth and kind

4

8 Mar 2026, 15:35 UTC363 viewsread 14 August 2026

|| 𝗙𝗼𝗿𝗺𝗮𝘁 𝗔𝗽𝗹𝗶𝗸𝗮𝘀𝗶 𝗣𝗿𝗲𝗺𝗶𝘂𝗺 𝗻𝗮𝗺𝗮 + 𝘂𝘀𝗻 : 𝗮𝗽𝗹𝗶𝗸𝗮𝘀𝗶 + 𝗷𝗲𝗻𝗶𝘀 : 𝗱𝘂𝗿𝗮𝘀𝗶 : 𝘀𝗵𝗮𝗿/𝗽𝗿𝗶𝘃 : 𝗲𝗺𝗮𝗶𝗹 + 𝗽𝗮𝘀𝘀 : 𝗱𝗶 𝗿𝗰 𝗮𝗱𝗺 𝗱𝗲𝘃𝗶𝗰𝗲 + 𝗹𝗼𝗰𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 : 𝗽𝗮𝘆𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁 : 𝗻𝗼𝘁𝗲 : 𝗶𝗻𝗿𝘂𝘀𝗵/𝗻𝗼 𝘁𝗮𝗴 𝗮𝗱𝗺 : || 𝗙𝗼𝗿𝗺𝗮𝘁 𝗡𝗼𝗸𝗼𝘀 𝗻𝗮𝗺𝗮 + 𝘂𝘀𝗻 : 𝗯𝗲𝗿𝗮𝗽𝗮 𝗻𝗼𝗸𝗼𝘀 + 𝗳𝘀/𝗻𝗳𝘀 : 𝗻𝗼𝗸𝗼𝘀 𝗮𝗽𝗮 : 𝗽𝗮𝘆𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁 : 𝘁𝗮𝗴 𝗮𝗱𝗺 : || 𝗙𝗼𝗿𝗺𝗮𝘁 𝗖𝗻𝗶𝘁 𝗻𝗮𝗺𝗮 + 𝘂𝘀𝗻 : 𝗯𝗲𝗿𝗮𝗽𝗮 𝗰𝗻𝗶𝘁 : 𝘁𝗼𝘁𝗮𝗹 : 𝗽𝗮𝘆𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁 : 𝘁𝗮𝗴 𝗮𝗱𝗺 : || 𝗙𝗼𝗿𝗺𝗮𝘁 𝗝𝗮𝘀𝗽𝗶𝗻 𝗻𝗮𝗺𝗮 + 𝘂𝘀𝗻 : 𝗷𝗮𝘀𝗽𝗶𝗻 𝗮𝗽𝗮 : 𝗳𝗲𝗲 : 𝗯𝗲𝗿𝗮𝗽𝗮 : 𝘁𝗮𝗴 𝗮𝗱𝗺 : || 𝗙𝗼𝗿𝗺𝗮𝘁 𝗝𝗮𝘀𝗴𝗲𝘁 𝗻𝗮𝗺𝗮 + 𝘂

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @nourishearcv. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,455,294 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Nourishé archive” (@nourishearcv), 21 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nourishearcv.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.