Channel
@noun_val_ghalam
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
144subscribers
-5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001779162815 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @noun_val_ghalam |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/noun_val_ghalam |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Sept 2026, 09:16 | 144 | -1 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 02:05 | 145 | -4 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 20:02 | 149 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:33 | 149 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 14 April 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 March 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
44 reactions across 12 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 61.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 27 | 61.4% | |
| 🔥 | 10 | 22.7% | |
| 💔 | 3 | 6.82% | |
| 😍 | 2 | 4.55% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 2.27% | |
| 😭 | 1 | 2.27% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 44 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 14 April 2024 to 21 March 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
بسم رب العشق این کانال یه وقتی برای یک هدف و علتی بر دو ستون بنا شد لکن هم الان نه اون علل برجاست نه اون اهداف و نه حتی اون ستونها به همین بابت این کانال بمونه شاید تا روزی که دلیلی باشه برای ادامش اما این کانالی که پایین لینکشو میزارم یه جاییه برای نوشتن بیشتر حرف دله هرکس دلش بود همراه بشه https://t.me/monajaf110 یاعلی ✋🏻
Signed Mohsen
اللهم الهن قتلة امیرالمومنین خدایا قاتلان امیرالمومنین را لعنت کن! مگر چند نفر در شهادت علی مرتضی دست داشتند؟!
💔2
Signed Mohsen
کاش یک امشب را به مسجد نمیرفتی…
Signed Mohsen
وأنت الكفيل بكل قلب مكسور… و تو مراقب تمام دلهای شکستهای؛ سلام امام عباس
❤1
Signed Mohsen
يا مَن بِهِ القَلبُ يَهنَأُ في رَغَدِ… ای آنکه دل با او در خوشی بیاساید؛ سلام امام حسین من
❤1
Signed Mohsen
بسم رب العشق آدما هیچ وقت خودشون و مقصر نمیدونن! -چرا زبونت انقدر تلخه؟ +تو چی گفتی که من مجبور شدم اینجوری جواب بدم؟! -تو چرا اونجوری گفتی؟ +تو چرا قبلش ساکت نشدی؟! -چرا تو قیافهای؟ +ببین کدوم کارت ناراحتم کرده؟! آره خلاصه؛ حق همیشه با ما نیست! رخ حق به جانب نگیریم دائما…🙂 #قسم ✍🏻 •|نٓ ۚ وَالْقَلَمِ وَمَا يَسْطُرُونَ|•
Signed Mohsen
بسم رب العشق تا حالا مافیا بازی کردی؟ از یه جایی به بعد دیگه کسی گوش به فکت و استدلال نمیده! ذهنشونو میبندن روی اون چیزی که بهش فکر میکنن. اینجا میرسی به بن بست… دقیقا در روابط آدمیزاد با هم همچین چیزی داریم. مهم نیست از یه جایی به بعد چقدر تلاش کنی! مهم نیست چقدر از خودت رو بزاری وسط و چقدر محبت خرج کنی! در نهایت یکی هست که از تو جلوتره، شاید کمتر از تو براش اهمیت داره ولی خب طرفت ذهنش و بسته دیگه؛ و دیگه مهم نی…
🔥3
Signed Mohsen
اینجا کسی هست؟!
🔥7😍2❤1💔1😭1
Signed Mohammad hossein
الحمدلله تلگرام و اینستاگرام یه چرخ میزنی همه از دن تحلیلگرن بدو بدو یه وقت امتیاز تحلیل مناظرات رو از دست ندی😕✊
👏1
Signed Mohsen Mousafarash
آقای امام حسین! قصهی حرّ و همه شنیدیم میخوام بگم حر یه بار به مادر شما ادب کرد، اجازه نندازید چکمه به گردن و سر افکنده بمونه! ما ها که عمریه محب مادر شماییم امروز یه نیم نگاهی به ما بکنید همه چی زیر و رو میشه امروز رزق اشک و عزای محرم بهمون بده امروز بنویس برامون اربعین پابوست…
❤6
Signed Mohsen Mousafarash
انالله و اناالیه راجعون
Signed Mohsen Mousafarash
اَمَّن یُّجیبُ المُضطَرَّ اِذا دَعاهُ وَ یَکشِفُ السُّوءَ
❤3
Signed Mohsen Mousafarash
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @noun_val_ghalam. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“نٓ ۚ وَالْقَلَمِ وَمَا يَسْطُرُونَ” (@noun_val_ghalam), 144 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/noun_val_ghalam.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.