Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

𝙅𝙖𝙢𝙚𝙨 𝙍𝙝𝙤𝙙𝙚𝙨' 𝙣𝙤𝙩𝙚𝙨

@notrhodey

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

13subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002295592405
TypeChannel
Username@notrhodey
Descriptionᴏᴡɴᴇʀ: ᴛʜᴇ ꜱᴍᴀʀᴛᴇꜱᴛ ᴀɴᴅ ᴍᴏꜱᴛ ʙᴇᴀᴜᴛɪꜰᴜʟ ᴘᴇʀꜱᴏɴ ᴀᴍᴏᴜʀ:? ꜱᴛᴀʀᴛ: 𝟢𝟣.𝟣𝟣.𝟤𝟢𝟤𝟦
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/notrhodey

Growth

1311 Aug 2026, 12:18 — 13 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 02:16 — 13 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 12:1812 Aug 2026, 02:16
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12–14 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 02:1613no change
11 Aug 2026, 12:1813first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 6 November 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 November 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
68
Videos
2
Links
37

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

41 reactions across 4 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 52853614356254137791536.6%
custom 52877348775028594061126.8%
custom 5287231309767269867819.5%
custom 5285479813514026024717.1%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 41reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 6 November 2025 to 16 November 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

16 Nov 2025, 15:28 UTC103 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @iwantllix

Сказать какие восхитительные в фд дневников Марвел ребята. Я готова расцеловать каждого. 🩸 И Лену с Кейт, что любят иногда испортить мне выходные. 🦇 И Стива с Вандой, которые появляются метко, прям в тему для новых шуток. 📞 И Старка, что жалуется вечно (я всё равно тебя продам, просто увеличу цену до 10 рублей) 🍒 И Гарри! Вы вообще видели его оформление? 🎵 Прекрасного и очень искреннего Питера, милый, ты достоен боль

16 Nov 2025, 15:27 UTC78 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026

как всегда великолепен, родной

custom 52853614356254137791

16 Nov 2025, 15:26 UTC57 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @TonyStarkWorld

#𝖯𝗈𝗌𝗍 𝗐𝗂𝗍𝗁 𝖱𝗁𝗈𝖽𝖾𝗌. #𝖬𝖾𝗆𝗈𝗋𝗂𝖾𝗌 Нью-Йорк оставил после себя не только разрушенные улицы, но и трещины в самом сердце. Тони Старк вернулся в свою Башню, но золотая и красная броня, казалось, принесла с собой пыль и пепел того дня. Город, который он защитил, теперь казался чужим, а тишина его пентхауса была оглушительнее любого взрыва. Он пытался работать. Руки инженера жаждали схемы, но мозг отказывался по

14 Nov 2025, 04:59 UTC49 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @Hawkeye_diaryPhoto

🎤 #Chat ; #Photo ⭐️⭐️🫥🫥🫥🫥⭐️ 🫥🫥🫥🫥😻𝘑𝘢𝘮𝘦𝘴 𝘙𝘩𝘰𝘥𝘦𝘴 — Роуди? Парень из бронекорпуса Старка? Да, он - тот, кто делает то же, что и Тони, только без всего этого эго. 🫥🫥🫥🫥🫥🫥🔵 boost

custom 52853614356254137792custom 52872313097672698672custom 52877348775028594062

13 Nov 2025, 15:13 UTC40 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

➹Interactive➹ С вас: Подписка на канал, без дальнейшей отписки. Репост этого поста. Ссылка на ваш дневник в комментариях С меня: Вы, как песня из моего плейлиста Вы, как мем Места: 5/5 #Interactive

13 Nov 2025, 07:48 UTC683 views11 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🤩Стив Роджерс, несмотря на свою невероятную физическую подготовку, всегда был немного старомоден, когда дело доходило до музыки. Его любимой музыкой остались песни 40-х годов, которые он слушал до того, как стал Капитаном Америкой. Джеймс Роудс, напротив, был настоящим меломаном, знавшим все современные музыкальные жанры, от хип-хопа до рока. 🤩Однажды, во время совместной тренировки в штаб-квартире Мстителей, Стив п

custom 52853614356254137794custom 52872313097672698674custom 52877348775028594062custom 52854798135140260241

7 Nov 2025, 11:21 UTC90 views23 reactionsread 12 August 2026

🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 Полковник Джеймс Роудс, оправившись от тяжелой травмы, обнаружил в себе новую, неожиданную связь с Баки Барнсом. Оба были людьми, пережившими нечто, что сломало их – физически или ментально – и теперь пытались собрать себя заново. Их встречи происходили редко, вдали от посторонних глаз, в укромных барах или тихих уголках города. Они не обсуждали битвы, не делились секретами правительств. Вместо этого, они г

custom 52853614356254137798custom 52877348775028594067custom 52854798135140260246custom 52872313097672698672

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @notrhodey. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

6 Nov 2025, 20:12 UTCAnonymous Poll29 voters

С кем жаждете следующий пост?

  1. Леголас на пенсии. Агент Бартон.7%
  2. Лучшая женщина в галактике. Миссис Поттс.38%
  3. Роудс.21%
  4. Агент Романофф.31%
  5. Роджерс.3%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 6 November 2025 to 16 November 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 572,157 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝙅𝙖𝙢𝙚𝙨 𝙍𝙝𝙤𝙙𝙚𝙨' 𝙣𝙤𝙩𝙚𝙨” (@notrhodey), 13 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/notrhodey.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.