3 measurements taken within a single day, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 216–217 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
9 Aug 2026, 05:53
217
+1
8 Aug 2026, 10:47
216
no change
8 Aug 2026, 06:47
216
first reading
Engagement
9 posts held, back to 23 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
4m 20s
Average length
2m 10s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
220 reactions across 9 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤🔥
88
40.0%
❤
60
27.3%
💋
50
22.7%
💔
22
10.0%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 220reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 23 November 2025 to 24 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 9 we hold a reading for · 22%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @notesv. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 9 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 23 November 2025 to 24 May 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
в этот раз решила показать вам просто наш семейный день — без какой-то особой эстетики. захотелось снять всё более по-настоящему, таким, каким этот день был на самом деле!
не знаю, как вам такой формат, но в этом видео я очень много что-то рассказываю и просто делюсь моментами. получилось немного сумбурно, потому что мы успели побывать в абсолютно разных местах, но каждое из них было по-своему интересным.
мне кажет…
сегодня я побывала на небольшом оркестре Моцарта, и я так прониклась этой атмосферой! 🎻
как же красиво играл весь женский оркестр. мне безумно понравилось наблюдать за ними: за их руками; за тем, как переливались туфельки у пианистки под светом; за тем, как они общались друг с другом буквально одним взглядом. в этом было столько элегантности..
звук был настолько чистым, что я будто слышала каждый инструмент отдельн…
фоточки со вчерашнего дня!
в этот раз решили прогуляться только вдвоем с Инессой(моя близняшка). запланировали много мест, я всё рассчитала поминутно и всё время следила за часами, поэтому мы даже толком не ели — просто не хотелось тратить ни минуты.
зато день получился очень тёплым и уютным, и мы спокойно успели выполнить весь мой план 😭
ещё умиляет тот факт, что мы очень полюбились профессорам.
в этом семестре у нас был последний предмет с нашей любимой профессоркой. когда мы собирались домой после последнего экзамена, она взяла нас за руки и сказала: «передайте вашей маме, что я завидую, что у вас такие красивые и умные дочери!» потом добавила, чтобы мы всегда поддерживали с ней связь, и крепко обняла нас 😭
ещё один корейский профессор сказал, чт…
сегодня была очень тёплая встреча с американским профессором, который раньше преподавал у нас, но недавно переехал в сеул. он давно хотел встретиться, и вот сегодня нам наконец удалось поболтать за чашкой кофе ☕
обсуждали всё подряд: учебу, его студентов, магистратуру, дружбу, сны, дискриминацию, дежавю, даже гадание по кофе на дне кружки. разговор получился очень живым, и хоть он профессор, но чувствовалась полная …
нравится эта фотография с программы по подготовке к трудоустройству!
у меня взяли интервью на английском, потому что остальные проходили его на корейском. видимо, так как программа глобальная, им нужен был английский язык. мы также там познакомились с латиноамериканкой переводчицей, и она была такой хорошей! я заметила, что она мёрзла, поэтому на второй день программы купила ей горячий кофе и грелку (в первый день н…
моя неделя в нескольких секундах 🍂
впервые делаю видео с background sounds, но надеюсь, вам понравится и такой формат видео!
💋11❤🔥8❤7💔1
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @notesv. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,245,723 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Declared links
One URL this entry has put in its own public description, shown exactly as written there. A declaration, not a verified association— we measured that the description contained this text, and nothing more. It is not a claim that this entry owns, runs or is connected to whatever the link resolves to; a description is text anyone controls, and anyone can put anyone else’s URL into it. How this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“lee's notes.” (@notesv), 217 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/notesv.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
