Channel
@notesofkhvan
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
300subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 15 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001776730833 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @notesofkhvan |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 15 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/notesofkhvan |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 03:57 | 300 | no change |
| 15 Sept 2026, 02:22 | 300 | first reading |
8 posts held, back to 9 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 8 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 8 (9 September 2026 – 14 September 2026) |
| Views total | 369 |
| Reactions total | 42 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 15 Sept 2026, 02:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
42 reactions across 7 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 15 | 35.7% | |
| 💔 | 12 | 28.6% | |
| 👍 | 10 | 23.8% | |
| 😁 | 2 | 4.76% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 2.38% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 2.38% | |
| 🙏 | 1 | 2.38% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 42 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 9 September 2026 to 14 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @notesofkhvan. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 8 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 9 September 2026 to 14 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Почему они не уехала Разговор получился честным, теплым и открытым, и мне показалось, что уместно было спросить у них важные, по моему мнению вопросы. Например, почему они не переехали. И ответ меня поразил до глубины души. "Я не хочу, чтобы они думали, что победили". Это по правде путь воина, который не каждому суждено одолеть. Но они пока справляются.
👍5❤2😁2🔥1🙏1
Без автобусов Женщины рассказали мне, что региональные власти очень не хотят, чтобы в Сребренице продолжали жить мусульмане. Это сильно не нравится властям Республики Сербской, поэтому в городе, например, перестали функционировать автобусы. Обе эти прекрасные женщины работают в школе и добираться до работы стало очень сложно.
❤4💔4👎1
Обед Я приехал пообедать с двумя прекрасными женщинами, которые потеряли своих отцов летом 95го года. Обычная однушка в Сребренице, стол, диван, говорили через переводчика и моего нового друга Аднана. Он переводил как мог и как умел. Меня накормили супом, картошкой, рисом, курицей, нагетсами и буреком сыром. А на десерт был фруктовый салат и чай. Некоторые интересные мысли я расскажу в следующих заметках
❤4👍3
Photo, posted without a caption
👍2
Случай в ООН В июле 2015 года, к двадцатилетию трагедии в Сребренице, Великобритания вынесла на голосование Совбеза ООН резолюцию об осуждении геноцида в Сребренице. Десять стран проголосовали «за», четыре воздержались. И только Россия проголосовала «против», заблокировав документ своим правом вето. Важное уточнение: резолюция ничего не устанавливала, геноцид был признан судами ещё в 2001 и 2007 годах. Это был симв…
❤5
Марш смерти Когда 11 июля 1995 года Сребреница пала, около 12–15 тысяч мужчин, мальчиков и стариков решили не сдаваться. Они бросились в горы, рассчитывая пройти пешком около 100 километров через леса и сербские позиции до тузланского фронта. это и есть Марш смерти. Как все было: 11–12 июля: люди собираются на холме за Поточари. Никто не знает дорогу, у многих нет еды, воды, оружия. В колонне — бойцы 28-й дивизии, …
💔6
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
💔2
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @notesofkhvan. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Путевые заметки пассажира по фамилии Хван” (@notesofkhvan), 300 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/notesofkhvan.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.