Channel
@notesaboutthewind
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
6subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002374342001 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @notesaboutthewind |
| Description | Зарисовки, фрагменты, спойлеры, заморозки🤲 Всем рада, всех люблю. Можете связаться со мной через анонку: http://t.me/voprosy?start=swh73 |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/notesaboutthewind |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 23:16 | 6 | no change |
| 11 Aug 2026, 23:16 | 6 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 2 September 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 September 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
30 reactions across 7 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 12 | 40.0% | |
| 🍓 | 7 | 23.3% | |
| 💋 | 4 | 13.3% | |
| ❤🔥 | 2 | 6.67% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 6.67% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 6.67% | |
| 😱 | 1 | 3.33% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 30reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 2 September 2025 to 28 September 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Контент будет, но сори братки я чет тильтанула пиздец, я хочу вновь прочувствовать весь тот спектр эмоций ❤️🩹 как же это было здорово. До сих пор иногда выключаю видео новичков, и чувствую этот 2021 год, и мне так хорошо. Безумно тёплые чувства к этой игре, и никак иначе
❤1
Опережаю своего соавтора, и прежде чем она выложит референс Джона, я покажу Вам скетчевый внешний вид Ричарда🫶🏻 Люблю его всей душой, и эту любовь я точно буду вливать в фанфик. Поддержкой для Ло в трудное время всегда будет он, несмотря на то, что и ему непросто. Он прекрасный друг и очень весёлый парень. Любите Ричи💚 #ЗаГраньюВечности
❤2🍓1💋1🔥1
Жаль интернет говно
😍
Ой какая я довольная
Ой кого я сделала
1. АААА, ИИ прогрессирует!😧 2. Аа, ИИ прогрессирует...?😶
Сейчас сижу и думаю как в идеале раскрутить то, что мы задумали для фанфика, и вот как бы, ну... Назрел один очень интересный вывод. Напишу сюда, хоть это слегка спойлерно, типа, я ничего такого и не говорю🙃 Джон - не жертва обстоятельств, не бедная овечка, который пошёл на [спойлер] действо из-за отсутствия выбора и отчаяния. Он добровольный самоубийца. У него не трогательная история. Его история - холодная и жесток…
🍓1🔥1
Заметки 1. Структура обязательна для любого творчества 2. Структура не ограничивает творчество 3. Структура — это не шаблон 4. Структура предусматривает контрольный список обязательных элементов 5. Структура повышает уровень мастерства
Выходит ремейк второй данганронпы, а фандом уже себя закопал. Какие же они лютые позорники, постыдились бы😶
Сука как я угараю это пиздец простите
Жили-были дед да баба. И была у них курочка Ряба. Снесла как-то курочка не золотое, а простое яичко. Дед бил-бил — не разбил. Баба била-била — не разбила. А мышка пробежала, хвостиком махнула... и не задела яйцо. Яйцо так и осталось целым. Сидят они и думают: и не разбить, и не съесть. Так и лежало оно на столе, пока не протухло. Так и выбросили они яйцо, и не стало у них ничего. Ни простого, ни золотого. Мораль: да…
❤🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @notesaboutthewind. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 780,578 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Notes on the Wind | REWASIV” (@notesaboutthewind), 6 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/notesaboutthewind.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.