Channel
@nosoknotswag
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
42subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001901366106 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @nosoknotswag |
| Description | главная лонли бой и неверленд энджоерка и розовых волос тоже . |
| Created | Between 1 March 2023 and 30 November 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/nosoknotswag |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 17:46 | 42 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 16:01 | 42 | first reading |
12 posts held, back to 22 March 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
230 reactions across 12 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5343889023687468086 | 54 | 23.5% | |
| 🍓 | 51 | 22.2% | |
| 🥰 | 27 | 11.7% | |
| custom 5465417532804443746 | 25 | 10.9% | |
| custom 5343909420487157434 | 18 | 7.83% | |
| ❤ | 16 | 6.96% | |
| custom 5334572556722648435 | 12 | 5.22% | |
| custom 5471960790925844833 | 9 | 3.91% | |
| 🙏 | 9 | 3.91% | |
| custom 5404789357842277393 | 4 | 1.74% | |
| 🍌 | 3 | 1.30% | |
| custom 5305734527094639960 | 1 | 0.435% | |
| 💘 | 1 | 0.435% |
Custom emoji. 7 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 230reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 22 March 2025 to 29 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
its just me and 91929291 variations of my style against the world (и фикс на слабом герое из ниоткуда каждый год)
custom 54719607909258448339🍓6custom 54047893578422773934custom 53345725567226484352
Signed василиса 숩
скетчбуковское
🍓6🥰6🙏4custom 53438890236874680862custom 53057345270946399601custom 54654175328044437461
Signed василиса 숩
i feel like uuuuu woodz
🥰10🍓7custom 53438890236874680867🍌3
Signed василиса 숩
бонус :3 стоят
custom 533457255672264843510🍓3custom 54654175328044437463custom 53438890236874680861
Signed василиса 숩
сын который найдёт батю во всех вселенных (twinkling watermelon reference 💔)
custom 534388902368746808613🍓4custom 53439094204871574344custom 54654175328044437461
Signed василиса 숩
🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰
custom 53438890236874680868🍓4custom 54654175328044437462
Signed василиса 숩
ура спидпеинт я контентмейкерка
🍓7custom 53438890236874680864custom 54654175328044437463
Signed василиса 숩
eyes that speak volumes
custom 534388902368746808613custom 53439094204871574344🍓3
Signed василиса 숩
😍
custom 54654175328044437466🍓2
Signed василиса 숩
let's ignore this shall we🕯🕯🕯🕯
❤11custom 53439094204871574347🍓5🙏2💘1
Signed василиса 숩
что-то рандом нарисованное с пар
custom 54654175328044437469❤5🙏3custom 53438890236874680862🍓1custom 53439094204871574341
Signed василиса 숩
кар
🥰11custom 53438890236874680864🍓3custom 53439094204871574342
Signed василиса 숩
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @nosoknotswag. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,054,403 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🍞 nosoknotswag” (@nosoknotswag), 42 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nosoknotswag.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.