Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for NorruAnna 18+

Channel

NorruAnna 18+

@norruanna

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

218subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 13 October 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002017071996
TypeChannel
Username@norruanna
DescriptionЖалуюсь на жизнь и пощу рисунки с транспуперами и людьми • • Где меня найти https://t.me/norruanna/2798 • Щитпост группа https://t.me/+LXdBSulgSw4wMjhi
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded13 October 2026
Last confirmed live14 October 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/norruanna

Growth

21813 Oct 2026, 18:47 — 218 subscribers13 Oct 2026, 19:22 — 218 subscribers13 Oct 2026, 18:4713 Oct 2026, 19:22
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 217–219 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Oct 2026, 19:22218no change
13 Oct 2026, 18:47218first reading

Engagement

7 posts held, back to 4 October 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
51.0%
avg views ÷ 218 subscribers
Avg views / post
111
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
29.3%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 7 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 October 2026
Posts held7 (4 October 2026 – 12 October 2026)
Views total779
Reactions total228
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Oct 2026, 19:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈2,130
Videos
≈87
Links
≈93

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

228 reactions across 7 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤‍🔥9139.9%
custom 53417867102105234683615.8%
🔥2511.0%
custom 5255976931538529855208.77%
🥰198.33%
❤187.89%
custom 5415904582880475948114.82%
custom 523554542421908797231.32%
custom 540890897450849014531.32%
🍓20.877%

Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 228 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 4 October 2026 to 12 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 7 we hold a reading for · 14%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @norruanna. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 7 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 October 2026 to 12 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

12 Oct 2026, 15:40 UTC47 views28 reactionsread 13 October 2026
Photo

Итак, я обещала, что с каждой новой посылкой я буду кидать фотки моего алтаря Сегодня приехал лот с Хифуми и.... Кажется меня скоро начнут выселять....

❤‍🔥11❤7custom 52559769315385298554🔥3🍓2🥰1

11 Oct 2026, 18:55 UTC60 views31 reactionsread 13 October 2026
Photo

Итак, сегодня случилось нашествие гипмик сходки кошмарить в Питере 👀 Блин спасибо всем большое я блин вас люблю вы лучшие вы сделали мой день и настроение на дни вперед я вас люблю 🤩🤩🤩🤩 🌟🌟🌟

❤‍🔥17❤8🥰4custom 52559769315385298552

9 Oct 2026, 08:32 UTC80 views15 reactionsread 13 October 2026

Я тут думаю о том, чтобы открыть коммишки, но пока я сомневаюсь в том, что было бы это вообще кому-то интересно? Учитывая, что цена у меня не низкая и стиль подходит не всем, то я хотела бы узнать, стоит ли мне вообще об этом думать или нет......👀

❤‍🔥10custom 54089089745084901453custom 52559769315385298552

8 Oct 2026, 18:14 UTC77 views7 reactionsread 13 October 2026
Forwarded from @Hypmic_digital_ZinePhoto

➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ Поприветствуем Авторов Зина ➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ _Aimiss_ beppinsan bunffoonish Dali Moneski DeeTheBeaver farXing | fXn @FC6C85 ixgjxf77 ketteisan kivss MC+ICHIRITA+ ned zhang nemuda NorruAnna Orange wine ottutuw Ozziko RIN4A.ᐟ Rorrris ℝ𝕒𝕤𝕡𝕦𝕥𝕚𝕟 saalkano swqxr3 tetsuraya v01 y u g e n yoshi Yuri_Email Граф Мяукало ЖУЖУ!! Игрок10ю Ирумасан кекшиш² тьягу лера вещает Мави из канав…

❤‍🔥4🔥3

7 Oct 2026, 22:11 UTC238 views61 reactions1 Starread 13 October 2026
Photo

Моя большая и нежная любовь к Хифудо 💚💛

❤‍🔥33custom 525597693153852985511custom 541590458288047594811❤3🥰3

6 Oct 2026, 18:19 UTC122 views17 reactionsread 13 October 2026
Photo

Я думаю, что выложу тоже свое мнение о том (нашего мнения японцы не спрашивали), что бы мне хотелось видеть по дуэтам по втором блоке парти Я еще ради прикола прошерстила твиттер и во второй строчке как раз собрала то, что выбирают большинство Ну будем надеяться и верить А еще я вынесла ЧТО БЫ ОЧ ХОТЕЛА, но эээээээ японцы снова сказали низя тока за денязкуу короче вот так

🥰8custom 52355454242190879723custom 53417867102105234683❤‍🔥1🔥1custom 52559769315385298551

4 Oct 2026, 17:02 UTC155 views69 reactionsread 13 October 2026
Photo

Везде показала, пора и тут Хисафудо с некоторыми нотками селфхарма и намека на нсфв мне очень стыдно бля

custom 534178671021052346833🔥18❤‍🔥15🥰3

Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @norruanna. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“NorruAnna 18+” (@norruanna), 218 subscribers as measured 13 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/norruanna.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.