Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

как найти слова

@norm_books

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

779subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001086065947
TypeChannel
Username@norm_books
Created1 December 2016measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/norm_books

Growth

7796 Aug 2026, 22:02 — 779 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 22:43 — 779 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 22:026 Aug 2026, 22:43
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 778–780 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Aug 2026, 22:43779no change
6 Aug 2026, 22:02779first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 4 January 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

818 reactions across 18 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤‍🔥40149.0%
🐳20925.6%
💯10913.3%
🤝9912.1%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 818reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 4 January 2026 to 21 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 19 we hold a reading for · 11%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @norm_books. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 January 2026 to 21 May 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

22 Apr 2026, 17:06 UTC≈2,540 views58 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

сука я не верю (ладно я верю)

🐳29❤‍🔥16💯11🤝2

19 Apr 2026, 18:36 UTC≈1,070 views38 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

я не буду, это мои любимые подписчики.

🤝22❤‍🔥9🐳6💯1

8 Apr 2026, 16:34 UTC≈1,150 views52 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

слушаюсь

🐳31🤝13❤‍🔥8

22 Mar 2026, 19:22 UTC≈1,420 viewsread 6 August 2026
Poll

выбираем следующий апдейт в приложении:

  1. бьёт током когда ты пытаешься добавить книгу издательства ad marginem41%
  2. вызывает психиатрическую лечебницу когда фильмов студии а24 становится слишком много (больше двух)31%
  3. набирает номер бывшей если включаешь какую-то категорию Песен (доступно только premium-юзерам)29%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

22 Mar 2026, 19:17 UTC≈1,120 views24 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

по многочисленным просьбам добавила импорт контента из кинопоиска, mubi, last.fm и тд чё ещё можно, чего раньше было нельзя: скинуть в приложение фотку своей книжной полки или типа того, и оно само разберет, что там, плюс добавит в нужную категорию ну и ещё разное по мелочи! всем доброго времени суток, целую @every_you_bot @every_you_bot @every_you_bot

❤‍🔥24

16 Mar 2026, 08:12 UTC967 views33 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

да, но ничего страшного…?)

💯22🐳6🤝5

10 Mar 2026, 11:31 UTC≈1,210 views54 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

мне кажется, мы недостаточно уделили внимания тому, что я сделала ПРИЛОЖЕНИЕ, в котором можно отмечать прочитанные книги, просмотренные фильмы и музыку и получить 1)прикольное саммари; 2)саммари без прикола + узнать сколько вам лет судя по контенту и тд!! и тп!! а если вам лень записывать книжки или фильмы вручную, вы можете скинуть в приложение скриншот из кинопоиска или яндекс музыки и оно САМО всё разберет и зап

❤‍🔥37🐳12💯4🤝1

8 Mar 2026, 19:17 UTC≈1,310 views80 reactions1 Starread 6 August 2026

уважаемые, любимые и все остальные сразу к делу — я сделала мини-эпп в телеграме, в котором можно трекать сразу весь ваш контент (фильмы, музыку и книги) + получить ии-обзор на этот контент (пока глупый, но ворк ин прогресс) у меня сложные отношения с площадками вроде letterboxd, goodreads и тд по причинам они уродливые и там есть гаденький вайб соцсетей, а хочется тихо сидеть и просто записывать что ты смотрел и ч

❤‍🔥47🐳18💯15

7 Mar 2026, 19:19 UTC814 views48 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

??? родители, обратите внимание

🐳27❤‍🔥9💯8🤝4

21 Feb 2026, 09:30 UTC≈1,110 views91 reactionsread 6 August 2026

про киндл несмотря на то, что по результатам опроса мне нужно было воздержаться, две недели назад я купила киндл цвета ✨матча✨ и с тех пор мне просто поебать на всё вокруг. подробности: 1. киндл цвета ✨матча✨ отлично помещается во внутренний карман самонадутой зимней куртки зисисневерзэт и поэтому довольно быстро выработалась привычка в любой непонятной ситуации не доставать телефон и скроллить чё там долбаебы с ан

❤‍🔥58🐳18💯8🤝7

20 Feb 2026, 16:37 UTC944 views32 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

ну когда уже будем мы и тд

❤‍🔥22🐳4💯4🤝2

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @norm_books. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

22 Mar 2026, 19:22 UTCAnonymous Poll150 voters

выбираем следующий апдейт в приложении:

  1. бьёт током когда ты пытаешься добавить книгу издательства ad marginem41%
  2. вызывает психиатрическую лечебницу когда фильмов студии а24 становится слишком много (больше двух)31%
  3. набирает номер бывшей если включаешь какую-то категорию Песен (доступно только premium-юзерам)29%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

31 Jan 2026, 13:13 UTCAnonymous Poll204 voters

дорогие, уважаемые и все остальные! нужен совет. киндл:

  1. круто, бери30%
  2. нет смысла, не бери26%
  3. я тоже думаю об этом и поэтому хочу посмотреть на результаты44%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 4 January 2026 to 21 May 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 940,363 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“как найти слова” (@norm_books), 779 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/norm_books.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.