I found this convo really interesting, so I uploaded it here, do take a moment to read it, I think you'll find it interesting too.
Signed 𝙎𝙝𝙪𝙗𝙝𝙖𝙢

Channel
@noobphilosphy
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
112subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002000348994 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @noobphilosphy |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 30 April 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 30 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 30 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/noobphilosphy |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 24 Aug 2026, 05:03 | 112 | +1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 07:01 | 111 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:57 | 111 | first reading |
9 posts held, back to 13 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
28 reactions across 8 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 78.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 22 | 78.6% | |
| ❤🔥 | 3 | 10.7% | |
| 👍 | 3 | 10.7% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 28reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 13 June 2026 to 10 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
I found this convo really interesting, so I uploaded it here, do take a moment to read it, I think you'll find it interesting too.
Signed 𝙎𝙝𝙪𝙗𝙝𝙖𝙢
हिमांशु: I do not think truth exists as something independent that our theories simply discover. Rather, I believe truth is model-dependent. We construct theoretical models to understand the world, and a claim is true only insofar as it coheres with and is supported by a successful model. When observations and evidence consistently fit a model, we have good reason to regard the claims made within that model as true. …
❤2
Signed 𝙎𝙝𝙪𝙗𝙝𝙖𝙢
This baboon might completely change the way you think about stress, friendship, cruelty, and even life itself. For over 30 years, Stanford neuroscientist Robert Sapolsky studied baboons in the Masai Mara. But why baboons? Because biologically, they're surprisingly similar to us. The Masai Mara is one of the most fertile savannas in the world. Food is abundant, predators rarely threaten the baboons, and they only n…
❤4
Signed 𝙎𝙝𝙪𝙗𝙝𝙖𝙢
Of Baboons and Men: Social Circumstances, Biology, and the Social Gradient in Health - Sociality, Hierarchy, Health: Comparative Biodemography - NCBI Bookshelf https://share.google/3sjA0wv9TzRbag9xa
❤2
Signed 𝙎𝙝𝙪𝙗𝙝𝙖𝙢
So, these are the things I've drawn in the last 10 days. Pardon me for the bad sketching, as I'm an absolute beginner right now, along with this, I have to complete some philosophy and history book reading, and I also have to study for my exams, very hectic life. 😵💫😵💫 I'll upload my improvements after one or two months.
❤5
Signed 𝙎𝙝𝙪𝙗𝙝𝙖𝙢
I have been sketching for the past week, or more than 10 days. I am a complete beginner and did not know anything beforehand, as you can see, I've practiced everything to gain control over lines and curves. Along with this, I am trying to improve my handwriting by practicing cursive letters, as you can see on the last page. I will upload the things I've drawn in the last 10 days.
❤4
Signed 𝙎𝙝𝙪𝙗𝙝𝙖𝙢
I watched Anand a long time ago, and it left a deep impression on me, watching this video brought back two of Mirza Ghalib's most beautiful couplets that perfectly capture the feeling, i'll share them below along with their meanings बाज़ीचा-ए-अतफ़ाल है दुनिया मिरे आगे, होता है शब-ओ-रोज़ तमाशा मिरे आगे। Meaning:- Life often feels like a never ending spectacle where people chase temporary things and take them too seri…
❤5
Signed 𝙎𝙝𝙪𝙗𝙝𝙖𝙢
If you are reading any post, please read all parts in sequence from start to end if those posts are in a sequence. otherwise, you can read any random post if it consists of only one part.
👍3
Signed 𝙎𝙝𝙪𝙗𝙝𝙖𝙢
PART8 7. Common Barriers to Critical Thinking Cognitive biases (confirmation bias, etc.) Emotions overriding logic Social pressure Lack of knowledge Overconfidence 8. How to Develop Critical Thinking Method 1: Ask Better Questions Why is this true? What is the evidence? Method 2: Learn Logic Understand: Deduction Induction Fallacies Method 3: Challenge Your Beliefs Try to disprove your own views Method 4: …
❤🔥3
Signed 𝙎𝙝𝙪𝙗𝙝𝙖𝙢
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @noobphilosphy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 444,347 of 1,627,445entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Noob Philosopher” (@noobphilosphy), 112 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/noobphilosphy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.