Сделайте репост по-братски кому не сложно ☕️
☃34🎄3🎉1
Channel
@noneits
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
508subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 10 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001474952616 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @noneits |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/noneits |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Sept 2026, 08:41 | 508 | -2 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 07:22 | 510 | no change |
| 10 Sept 2026, 06:47 | 510 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 21 December 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 December 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
897 reactions across 20 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ☃ | 316 | 35.2% | |
| 🎉 | 217 | 24.2% | |
| 🎅 | 179 | 20.0% | |
| 🍾 | 89 | 9.92% | |
| 🎄 | 80 | 8.92% | |
| ❤ | 8 | 0.892% | |
| 👍 | 4 | 0.446% | |
| 💩 | 1 | 0.111% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 0.111% | |
| 😐 | 1 | 0.111% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 0.111% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 897 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 December 2024 to 23 December 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @noneits. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 21 December 2024 to 23 December 2024. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Сделайте репост по-братски кому не сложно ☕️
☃34🎄3🎉1
В общем принял решение сместить свое место обитания с этого ТГК на новый. Почему же так вы спросите? А проблема лишь одна, но она то по сути является глобальной - деньги. Канал потерял возможность публиковать рекламу из-за очень странной ошибки от Яндекса, поэтому зарабатывать со своего единственного хобби именно здесь возможности не имеется, пытались как-то решить этот вопрос и я все таки надеялся что все решится, н…
🎅59☃8🎄7❤5🍾3🎉1👍1🥰1
Короче сегодня вас ждёт очень резкая и неожиданная наверное инфа от меня, поэтому готовьтесь ребятки ☕️
🎅35🍾11🎄4☃2
С последних квалификаций по итогу вышли… ❓ [?] Egoista • shkiper • Juane • abturex • ill7sion • Chester 🍒 [PR] Predict • riHte3i • osu • artik • Feduhennn • AiM4ka ❓ [?] PADAR • wolaut • blade • fOLYYy • qnix • online Последние, насколько мне донесли - это стак айпадеров где играют типы которые находятся в бан-листе у Халида, ну софтиком пользуются конечно же спокойно)) Не знаю даже что сказать тут если честно, …
🍾32☃4❤2
Погнал я спать короче чуваки, не могу уже ждать команды, которые в клозед выйдут по итогу, напишите в комментариях потом че как за меня👇
🎉27👍1
❓ Tripple Team 💬 🫨 Heavenly Spirits ⏺hate me ⏺Tripple ⏺horts ⏺worner ⏺w1npel Стак, который по идее совсем недавно собрался и выглядит классно на самом деле, опять же эта связка между опытом и молодостью результат принести может. Ребята уже вышли в закрытые квалификации к турниру от CYBERHERO, так что именно там мы возможно сможем лицезреть их под новыми знамёнами. Как вам такое подписание и состав в целом? 0-3 / …
☃79🎄11🎉10🎅2🍾1💩1
Нет, все-таки камбека не будет, 🤠 Медведи наконец-то выигрывают титул и делают это так, чтобы обиднее было как говорится. Первый титул спустя 8 месяцев и 2 титул для организации Virtus.prо в игре! Для ❤️ FORZE это уже третье серебро за 4 месяца и обидно, что qu1ns3 & w1nnerx не смогли забрать 1 места на последнем сезоне EPIC в Standoff 2, ибо именно они в составе 😬 Bullet Force становились победителями 1-го сезона.…
☃34🎉6🍾5🎄2
Это реально второй камбек за день, че началось то хоть 😕
🎅16🎉3
🤠 VP достаточно уверенно забрали уже аж 2 карты в финале против ❤️ FORZE, неужели медведи наконец заберут золото после 8 месяцев полной засухи? Кто победит, как думаете? 🤠 - ☃️ ❤️ - 🎉
☃69🎉27🎄4
Это все похоже на какой-то масштабный рофл, я понял бы если б об этом говорилось заранее (возможно и говорилось, но инфу я нигде не нашел), но говорить об этом буквально сегодня учитывая что у большей половины нет условных ПК к которым веб-камеры эти можно подключить (не знаю возможно ли вебку с телефона врубить во время игры), дичь какая-то полнейшая, судьи и организаторы вообще будто не шарят куда они зашли и что м…
🎄22🎉4👍2
☃️ CYBERHERO NEW YEAR CUP: OQ4 Команды, которые уже получили свои путевки 👇 🥱 [STR8] STREETEIGHT 🍒 [DG] Devilish Gang 🫨 [RGC] Regicide 😰 [azrw] Azure Way 🙂 [Soum] Soumex 😬 [RGG] RevialGG 😬 [BF] Bullet Flame 🤫 [ANBL] Anable ❓ [?] Tripple Team … … … Осталось всего 3 слота и вот эти команды за них сегодня поборятся 👇 ❓[AGR7] AGGRESSIVE 7 • Luce • RECORD • Electronic • V57 • dEllinger 😘 [Luxus] Luxury Aimers • ASHH …
☃21🎅5🎄1
😬 Bullet Flame & ANABLE 🤫 о которых мы уж очень давно ничего не слышали также выходят в закрытые! 😱 King 7 & Tripple Team ❓ прямо сейчас борятся за последний слот. Upd: Tripple Team побеждают
🎉28🎅4
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @noneits. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@noneits named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ПЕРЕШЕЛ В НОВЫЙ ТГК (itsnone)” (@noneits), 508 subscribers as measured 12 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/noneits.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.