Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Шумахер про иллюстрацию

Channel

Шумахер про иллюстрацию

@non_stop_jpegs

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

887subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001839359514
TypeChannel
Username@non_stop_jpegs
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/non_stop_jpegs

Growth

8858878867 August 2026 — 885 subscribers8 August 2026 — 885 subscribers15 August 2026 — 887 subscribers7 August 202615 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 8 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 885–887 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 20:08887+2
8 Aug 2026, 01:05885no change
7 Aug 2026, 22:39885first reading

Engagement

8 posts held, back to 31 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
16.8%
avg views ÷ 887 subscribers
Avg views / post
149
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
9.74%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 8 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held8 (31 July 20267 August 2026)
Views total1,191
Reactions total116
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 01:05 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

116 reactions across 8 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥4437.9%
3832.8%
😁2118.1%
❤‍🔥32.59%
💯21.72%
🗿21.72%
🤔21.72%
🤝21.72%
🆒10.862%
👀10.862%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 116reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 09:14 UTC110 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Кто для вас самый медийный российский иллюстратор? За кем регулярно наблюдаете? С чьей картинкой купили бы футболку?

🤔2👀1

4 Aug 2026, 17:32 UTC142 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @thehatelandPhoto

Принес вам новый опен колл - на этот раз для NFT NYC 2026. 🗽 Как и в прошлые годы, лучшие работы будут показаны на огромных экранах Times Square во время фестиваля в сентябре. Всегда приятно видеть, как цифровое искусство выходит за пределы экрана и оказывается в настоящей городской среде. Я сам в этот раз отправил туда: Everyday Knights, Vértebra и одну из моих любимых старых работ - Girl With Eyes Like The Eclip

9❤‍🔥3

4 Aug 2026, 15:50 UTC131 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Когда всё — 10 из 10 Оформление ☕️☕️☕️☕️☕️☕️☕️☕️☕️☕️ Сам материал ☕️☕️☕️☕️☕️☕️☕️☕️☕️☕️ Фотографии ☕️☕️☕️☕️☕️☕️☕️☕️☕️☕️ Сборка проекта ☕️☕️☕️☕️☕️☕️☕️☕️☕️☕️ Ужасно нравится! Прямо сейчас мы работаем над айдентикой сразу для двух новых брендов кофеен. Ни одной ничего подобного мы не продадим, потому что не в бриф и вообще "это другое". Но полюбоваться и вам показать пример идеального проекта в портфолио — самое то.

8🔥2💯1🆒1

3 Aug 2026, 10:21 UTC151 views35 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Хочу написать два новых материала, не могу выбрать, что вперед: 🔥 - Обзор на молодое иллюстраторское агентство Brillo (Италия, издают журнал, всего 6 лет, меньше 10 авторов, уже громкие проекты и клиенты) ❤️ - Обзор на известное агентство CWC (Токио, больше 20 лет опыта, лицензирование, нестандартные проекты) Про что интересно?

🔥2112🤝2

3 Aug 2026, 09:38 UTC179 views18 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Рассматриваю иллюстрацию Клары Бургоэнд (Clara Bergoënd) с Альпами, готовлюсь к отпуску на следующей неделе 🏔 А если серьезно, то исследую часто упоминаемый тренд в иллюстрации — рост спроса в мире высокой моды. 🔵 Тот факт, что громкие модные дома все чаще используют иллюстрацию и анимацию, мы с вами видим. Интересно другое — кто эти авторы, как они выходят на таких крупных клиентов (или скорее клиенты на них). 🔵

🔥134💯1

3 Aug 2026, 08:41 UTC153 views24 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Скажите честно, у вас бывает такое, что смотришь работы популярного иллюстратора (или агентства), там и лайки, и подписки, и клиенты с именами… а ты думаешь — ну что за ужо_Ос? 😄 - постоянно 🗿 - никогда ❤️ - признание равно качество

😁21🗿21

31 Jul 2026, 13:48 UTC187 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @dprofileruPhoto

«МЕРЧ.ПРЕМИЯ» возвращается и выходит на международный уровень! Если вы создаёте мерч, который подчеркивает идентичность бренда, помогает выстроить тесную коммуникацию с потребителем и просто тот, который не хочется выпускать из рук — этот конкурс для вас. Ваши работы увидят эксперты индустрии, представители крупных компаний и коллеги, которые формируют актуальный рынок. Номинации премии: — «Креативный мерч»; — «А

4

31 Jul 2026, 11:49 UTC138 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @illustrationruPhoto

#челленджи на август

🔥8

Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @non_stop_jpegs. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 780,044 of 1,550,220entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Шумахер про иллюстрацию” (@non_stop_jpegs), 887 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/non_stop_jpegs.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.