🪷🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🪷 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩 I'ⲙ jᥙsᴛ ᥲ ᥕᥲᥒɗᥱrᥱr 🕊🤩 🤩🤩 🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀 🤩🤩🤩🤩🎀🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🪷Ph
custom 52246880432475550375custom 53098588295701550824custom 54654862780509792324

Channel
@nolven5
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
76subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002187447926 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @nolven5 |
| Description | How do you know what's real and what's not when the whole world is inside your head?💭 Лс: @nolven_s Анонимка: http://t.me/anonaskbot?start=75pxcjs |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/nolven5 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 20:46 | 76 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:03 | 76 | first reading |
9 posts held, back to 24 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 9 (24 July 2026 – 9 August 2026) |
| Views total | 343 |
| Reactions total | 154 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Aug 2026, 20:46 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
154 reactions across 9 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5465486278050979232 | 57 | 37.0% | |
| custom 5235671120731983393 | 37 | 24.0% | |
| custom 5451894738078696746 | 30 | 19.5% | |
| custom 5224688043247555037 | 15 | 9.74% | |
| custom 5309858829570155082 | 15 | 9.74% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 154reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @nolven5. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 9 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 24 July 2026 to 9 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🪷🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🪷 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩 I'ⲙ jᥙsᴛ ᥲ ᥕᥲᥒɗᥱrᥱr 🕊🤩 🤩🤩 🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀 🤩🤩🤩🤩🎀🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🪷Ph
custom 52246880432475550375custom 53098588295701550824custom 54654862780509792324
🤍🤍🤍 🤍🤍🤍 🤍🤍🤍 𝒮𝓌ℯℯ𝓉 𝒹𝒶𝓎, 𝓈ℴ 𝒸ℴℴ𝓁, 𝓈ℴ 𝒸𝒶𝓁𝓂, 𝓈ℴ 𝒷𝓇𝒾ℊ𝒽𝓉, 𝒯𝒽ℯ 𝒷𝓇𝒾𝒹𝒶𝓁 ℴ𝒻 𝓉𝒽ℯ ℯ𝒶𝓇𝓉𝒽 𝒶𝓃𝒹 𝓈𝓀𝓎; 𝒯𝒽ℯ 𝒹ℯ𝓌 𝓈𝒽𝒶𝓁𝓁 𝓌ℯℯ𝓅 𝓉𝒽𝓎 𝒻𝒶𝓁𝓁 𝓉ℴ-𝓃𝒾ℊ𝒽𝓉, ℱℴ𝓇 𝓉𝒽ℴ𝓊 𝓂𝓊𝓈𝓉 𝒹𝒾ℯ 🤍🤍🤍🤍
custom 52246880432475550377custom 54518947380786967464custom 53098588295701550822custom 52356711207319833931
✧·˚˚·✧𝐒 𝐂 𝐀 𝐑 𝐀 𝐌 𝐎 𝐔 𝐂 𝐇 𝐄✧˚·˚·✧ 🕊 𝓨𝓸𝓾 𝔀𝓪𝓷𝓽 𝓶𝓮 𝓽𝓸 𝓲𝓷𝓽𝓻𝓸𝓭𝓾𝓬𝓮 𝓶𝔂𝓼𝓮𝓵𝓯?𝓘'𝓿𝓮 𝓰𝓸𝓷𝓮 𝓫𝔂 𝓶𝓪𝓷𝔂 𝓷𝓪𝓶𝓮𝓼 𝓪𝓷𝓭 𝓽𝓲𝓽𝓵𝓮𝓼 𝓭𝓾𝓻𝓲𝓷𝓰 𝓶𝔂 𝓳𝓸𝓾𝓻𝓷𝓮𝔂. 🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤩🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍 😀Ph: DAUR
custom 546548627805097923213custom 523567112073198339310custom 54518947380786967468
━✦༻ᏦᎽᗪᗣ Ꮍᗯᙁᗣ ᑓᙁᑌᙅ? ༺✦━ Иɜᴏᴦнуᴛы ᴛᴇни, ᴨуᴦᴀющиʍ ᴛᴀнцᴇʍ Нᴀᴋᴩыʙ бᴇᴄᴨᴏᴋᴏйныᴇ ᴇᴧи, Вᴏᴇʍ нᴇᴄᴛᴩᴏйныʍ ɜᴏʙуᴛ ᴨᴏᴛᴇᴩяᴛьᴄя И ɯᴇᴨчуᴛ: "Кудᴀ уɯᴧᴀ Эᴧиᴄ?" Рᴀɜбᴩᴏᴄᴀны ᴨᴧᴀᴛья, ɜᴀбыᴛы ᴛᴇᴛᴩᴀдᴋи, Тихᴏньᴋᴏ ɯᴀᴦᴀюᴛ чᴀᴄы - В ϶ᴛᴏʍ нᴇᴨᴩᴀʙиᴧьнᴏʍ бᴇᴄᴨᴏᴩядᴋᴇ Нᴇ ɜнᴀюᴛ, ᴋудᴀ иʍ идᴛи. Уюᴛныᴇ ᴨᴏᴧᴋи и ɜʙᴏнᴋиᴇ бᴧюдцᴀ Сᴋᴏᴩᴏ ɜᴀᴛихнуᴛ ᴨᴏд ᴨыᴧью. Они ᴩᴀɜᴧᴏʍᴀюᴛᴄя и ᴩᴀɜᴏбьюᴛᴄя, И чᴀɯᴋи ᴨᴏчᴛи чᴛᴏ ᴏᴄᴛыᴧи... Вᴩᴇʍя ɜᴀᴄᴛыᴧᴏ, ʙ нᴇʍᴏʍ ᴏжидᴀнии Тихᴏньᴋᴏ ɯᴀᴦᴀюᴛ …
custom 52356711207319833935custom 54654862780509792323
Меня в последние дни вдохновение настигло. Сейчас опять стих будет👀
custom 54654862780509792323
Фоточки с Аникона подъехали 🐈⬛ Ph
custom 54654862780509792329custom 54518947380786967465custom 53098588295701550824custom 52246880432475550372
Немного кадров за работой. Я везде сижу типа ☺️🥲 Ph
custom 546548627805097923211custom 52356711207319833937custom 53098588295701550825custom 52246880432475550371
🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍 🤍𝔄𝔢𝔤𝔯𝔦𝔱𝔲𝔡𝔬 𝔞𝔪𝔬𝔯𝔦𝔰🤍 🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍 Прошу, дай мне волю Увидеть, как кровью Рисуешь на коже моей Посыпь раны солью Разве может любовью Называться что-то слабей? Поцелуй мои раны Рубиново алые Созерцай их в больном наслаждении Мое сердце изломано Но я здесь будто дома Я кошмарным окутана сном, наваждением Вытри тихие слезы Подожги, чтоб не мёрзла Самым ярким огнем - я умру пред тобою без возражения Я из пепла вос…
custom 54654862780509792326custom 52356711207319833935custom 54518947380786967464
🌟🌟🌟🌟✝️🌟🌟🌟🌟 𝔗 𝔞𝔪 𝔠𝔯𝔢𝔞𝔱𝔦𝔬𝔫, 𝔟𝔬𝔱𝔥 𝔥𝔞𝔲𝔫𝔱𝔢𝔡 𝔞𝔫𝔡 𝔥𝔬𝔩𝛾🤩 🤍🤍 👼
custom 52356711207319833939custom 54518947380786967469custom 54654862780509792328
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @nolven5. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 724,212 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ꪀ᥆ꪶꪜꫀꪀ♡ ˚ *” (@nolven5), 76 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nolven5.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.