2 measurements spanning 4 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 66–68 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
10 Aug 2026, 01:15
67
no change
6 Aug 2026, 10:52
67
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
51.2%
avg views ÷ 67 subscribers
Avg views / post
34.3
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.39%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 14 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026
Posts held
20 (6 August 2026 – 9 August 2026)
Views total
686
Reactions total
27
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
10 Aug 2026, 01:15 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
35
Videos
9
Links
46
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
45s
Average length
11s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
27 reactions across 14 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
10
37.0%
👍
7
25.9%
❤
5
18.5%
👏
2
7.41%
🙏
2
7.41%
👎
1
3.70%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 27reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
👈 لذت بیشتر ≠ خوشبختی بیشتر!
✳️ تفاوت عمیق مغزی بین «لذت» و «خوشبختی»
🔺 لذت، یه تحریک کوتاهمدته که از دوپامین تغذیه میکنه.
مشکل اینجاست که اگه بیش از حد بهش بدی، سلولهای عصبیت خسته میشن و کمکم میمیرن.
نتیجهاش؟ اعتیاد و وابستگی روانی 😵💫🎢
🔺 اما خوشبختی واقعی از سروتونین میاد؛ یه پیامرسان آرامبخش که به سلولهات میگه: «آروم باش، همهچیز درسته» 🌿😌
این همون حسیه که بهت آرامش عمیق و رضایت باثبات میده.
📌 هرچی…
"نقشه راه شکست"
جاشوا شی (که خودش ۴ کتاب در این زمینه نوشته) میگه:
"بیشتر کسانی که در ترک پورن شکست میخورند، نه به خاطر ضعف اراده، بلکه به خاطر نداشتن نقشه راه شکست میخورند."
یعنی چی؟ یعنی وقتی وسوسه میآید، از قبل تصمیم نگرفتهای که چه کار کنی. پس در همان لحظه، مغزت به سمت عادت قدیمی میرود.
راهکاری که جاشوا پیشنهاد میده:
قبل از اینکه وسوسه بیاید، یک "برنامه واکنش" بنویس. مثلاً:
"اگر وسوسه شدم، اول ۱۰ نفس …
خیلیها فکر میکنن پورن رایگانه، اما این بزرگترین اشتباهه!
چون گرونترین چیزها رو با چند ثانیه نگاه کردن عوض میکنی.
مثلاً چی؟ 🤔
مثلاً اصالت خودمون رو میدیم به یه برهنگی تازهبهدورانرسیدهی غربی.
روحمون رو میفروشیم، اونقدر که بعد از مدتی که به خودمون میایم، میبینیم یه روحِ شرور جاش نشسته که همهی صفات بد رو توی ما پرورش داده
وقت، استعداد، انرژی، ظاهر، فکر، آدمای دوروبرمون، برنامهها و هدفامون رو میدیم برای …
قانون ۳ ثانیهای که زندگیت رو عوض میکنه! ⏳
وقتی وسوسه شدی، فقط ۳ ثانیه مکث کن و از خودت بپرس:
"آیا این انتخاب، مرا به کسی که میخواهم باشم نزدیکتر میکند یا دورتر؟"
رمز موفقیت در ترک پورن، جنگیدن با عادت نیست؛ ساختن هویت جدید است.
تو معتاد به پورن نیستی؛ تو کسی هستی که به پورن پشت کردهای. 🚀
---
📌 از J.K. Emezi
#ترفند
#کار_عملی
⚡️Nofap Vision I نوفپ ویژن
از خودت بپرس وجود چه چیزی تو زندگیم خوشحال ترم میکنه؟
حذف کردن چه چیزی از زندگیم به حال خوبم کمک میکنه؟
#کار_عملی
#روانشناسی
⚡️Nofap Vision I نوفپ ویژن
نکتهی کلیدی: پذیرش بدون شرم
سارا بروور تأکید میکند که این فرآیند با شفقت به خود پیش میرود، نه با تنبیه. اگر یک بار شکست خوردی، به خودت نگو «ببین، من هنوز معتادم». بگو:
«من کسی هستم که در مسیر تغییر است و این یک قدم کوچک در مسیر طولانی بود»
⚡️Nofap Vision I نوفپ ویژن
تمرین عملی سارا بروور برای تغییر هویت
او یک تمرین ساده پیشنهاد میدهد :
قدم ۱: از خودت بپرس:
«کسی که به پورن نیاز ندارد، الان چکار میکند؟»
قدم ۲: کاری را که آن فرد انجام میدهد، انجام بده.
مثلاً اگر آن فرد وقتش را با مطالعه پر میکند، تو هم مطالعه کن.
قدم ۳: به خودت ثابت کن که همان فرد هستی.
هر بار که مطابق هویت جدیدت عمل کنی، به ناخودآگاهت ثابت میکنی که تغییر کردهای
راهحل: ساختن هویت جدید
به جای «من معتادم»، این هویتها رو برای خودت بساز :
· «من کسی هستم که به پورن نیازی ندارم»
· «من کسی هستم که با احساساتم روبرو میشوم»
· «من کسی هستم که میتوانم از وسوسه عبور کنم»
این تغییر هویت یک شبه اتفاق نمیافته، بلکه با تکرار و عمل ساخته میشه
مشکل اصلی: برچسبهای مخرب
وقتی به خودت برچسبهایی مثل این رو بزنی:
· «من یک معتادم»
· «من ضعیفارادهام»
· «من هیچوقت نمیتونم ترک کنم»
ناخودآگاهت این برچسبها رو باور میکنه و هر بار که وسوسه میشوی، میگوید: «خب، تو که معتادی، پس این کار طبیعیه.»
این برچسبها باعث درماندگی آموختهشده میشوند؛ یعنی باور میکنی که تغییر غیر ممکنه، پس حتی تلاش نمیکنی
🔥2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @nofap_vision. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 680,861 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Nofap Vision | نوفپ ویژن” (@nofap_vision), 67 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nofap_vision.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.