Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Квинтим 🛐

Channel

Квинтим 🛐

@nobeless_qvinteem

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

305subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001998108155
TypeChannel
Username@nobeless_qvinteem
CreatedBetween 1 October 2023 and 30 April 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/nobeless_qvinteem

Growth

305306305.56 August 2026 — 306 subscribers6 August 2026 — 306 subscribers13 August 2026 — 305 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 6 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 305–306 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 02:05305-1
6 Aug 2026, 22:31306no change
6 Aug 2026, 21:03306first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 12 February 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
43.4%
avg views ÷ 305 subscribers
Avg views / post
133
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
11.6%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 August 2026
Posts held18 (12 February 20261 August 2026)
Views total1,060
Reactions total123
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 22:31 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

536 reactions across 18 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 536382447946409809814527.1%
custom 53190290228338100269517.7%
custom 53818410211622635538616.0%
custom 52244763657843884168215.3%
custom 52107753642755748066011.2%
custom 5206593827065845800356.53%
custom 5424985694227414861264.85%
custom 535041481417691149171.31%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 536reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 12 February 2026 to 1 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
11
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 18 we hold a reading for · 11%
Most on one post
9
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @nobeless_qvinteem. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 12 February 2026 to 1 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

1 Aug 2026, 19:54 UTC145 views12 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Я теперь буду репостить на эту стену всё, что связано со вселенной #Я_и_моё_Зеркало Контент подаренный моему ориджу я ценю больше всего на свете. Спасибо, дорогие за всю эту красотищу! Я вас обожаю!😡

custom 53190290228338100267custom 52107753642755748063custom 54249856942274148612

1 Aug 2026, 19:51 UTC126 views11 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Вот так лучше конечно

custom 54249856942274148618custom 53190290228338100262custom 52244763657843884161

1 Aug 2026, 19:51 UTC102 views9 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @SunnyShpuntikLovesYOUPhoto

🦊🦊♥️🦊🦊 ❤️Коммишка для @qvinteem !!! Было ОЧЕНЬ интересно рисовать этих чуваков. При том, что людей изображать для меня - это хардкор. Но спасибо Лидии, что доверилась. И спасибо за её чёткие ТЗ и правки без абстракции. Это сильно помогло мне. ♥️Для меня было важно сделать как можно качественнее и лучше. Персонажи и их детали мне запали в душу. Пока рисовала, общалась с Квинтим. Она рассказала некоторые факты, которы

custom 54249856942274148616custom 52244763657843884163

1 Aug 2026, 19:50 UTC102 views9 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @bankamazikaPhoto

Недовольные внезапной взяткой проводники для @qvinteem Давно не рисовала полноценки маркерами, навык ещё не потерян. Всё понравилось хозяйке, а я рада была наконец отдать этот заказ🚂🚂🚂

custom 52107753642755748069

1 Aug 2026, 19:50 UTC101 views9 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @bankamazikaPhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 52107753642755748069

1 Aug 2026, 19:50 UTC107 views10 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @Bilka_MexPhoto

Ещё один портретик для моего любимого цветочка 🌸

custom 531902902283381002610

1 Aug 2026, 19:50 UTC112 views12 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @Bilka_MexPhoto

Коммишечка с мужиками для моего любимого цветочка 🥰💜🥰

custom 531902902283381002612

24 Jul 2026, 14:45 UTC265 views51 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Тихо, не спеша, приношу в этот канал машиниста, и ухожу, ничего не пояснив, как обычно, почти навсегда, черемша, всем пока 💖 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 #Я_и_моё_зеркало

custom 522447636578438841624custom 521077536427557480613custom 54249856942274148618custom 53190290228338100266

5 Jul 2026, 21:10 UTC494 views73 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Прошу минуточку внимания. Данный тгк это моё портфолио с полноценными работами без щит поста. Я не знаю от чего тут пошли массовые отписки, но в целом и ладно. Если вы думаете, что данный тгк заброшен - ошибаетесь. У меня просто сейчас нет сил выдавать полноценки каждый день. Жду от себя чуда, оно непременно сбудется, я в себя верю🤯 Отписка = воняешь какашками навсегда

custom 531902902283381002629custom 522447636578438841626custom 521077536427557480618

4 Jul 2026, 11:05 UTC493 views14 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

custom 52244763657843884167custom 53190290228338100263custom 52107753642755748062custom 54249856942274148612

3 Jul 2026, 21:09 UTC477 views41 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Увезите меня в ЗАГС 🙂 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 #Я_и_моё_зеркало #Лёха #Алекс

custom 531902902283381002624custom 53504148141769114917custom 52107753642755748066custom 52244763657843884164

3 Jul 2026, 18:01 UTC400 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

custom 52244763657843884164

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @nobeless_qvinteem. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 250,078 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Квинтим 🛐” (@nobeless_qvinteem), 305 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nobeless_qvinteem.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.