2 measurements taken within a single day, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 495–496 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
9 Aug 2026, 08:51
495
-1
8 Aug 2026, 18:17
496
first reading
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 16 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
5 reactions across 2 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 80.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🤣
4
80.0%
❤
1
20.0%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 16 May 2026 to 8 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
⚡️Так же есть услуги продажи
⚡️Приложение
⚡️Сайтов
Цены мы все обсудим ❗️
⚡️И дизайнерские услуги ( Аватарки, прьевю и тд )
⚡️Обучение по созданию сайта и приложение
⚡️Обучение проходят по тексту и фотографиями если кому то не понятно то могу по дэмке ❗️
Дэф - начиная от месяца до навсегда!
Дэфаю везде и в любом случае 🌟
Приватки
1 lvl - 1000 ( докс осинт и ТД )
2 lvl - 1500 ( заказ на дом,мануал и софты )
По вс…
верю конечно после моих слов скинуть пруфы на то что это не он,он зашел на аккаунт с индий и вышел от туда после этого кидает мне скрин что тип якобы нету других аккаунтов 😂прикрывается тем что кидал данные не он а тот человек который написал мне с аккаунта индий хотя таргет заявлял он🤣 это настолько смешно что общаться с ним бесполезно
@Sabziro_KZ позорище полное кидает левые данные людей и заявляет о том что валиднул меня то я 2007 то 2004 иногда даже ефримов угадали только имя пробивает через бесплатный гайды с тг и много берет на себя фулл его работу может сделать и начинающий доксер😂 не в обиду но сынок конченный шлюхи в правду он 2011 и вдохновился через мои работы в тг🍸так как до моего приезда с сферу таких как сабзиро не было так же спайдер …
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @no_problemin. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 434,324 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@no_problemin named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@zhakupoovv01 named in 1 post, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“бездействие” (@no_problemin), 495 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/no_problemin.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
