Channel
@no_jaghe
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
480subscribers
-5 since we began measuring on 15 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002090147281 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @no_jaghe |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 15 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/no_jaghe |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 04:59 | 480 | -1 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 10:01 | 481 | -10 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 22:33 | 491 | +4 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 01:25 | 487 | -2 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 20:25 | 489 | +4 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 15:01 | 485 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 2 May 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
213 reactions across 19 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 127 | 59.6% | |
| 🤣 | 31 | 14.6% | |
| 🔥 | 16 | 7.51% | |
| 😱 | 10 | 4.69% | |
| 💔 | 9 | 4.23% | |
| 🤓 | 6 | 2.82% | |
| 👏 | 5 | 2.35% | |
| ❤🔥 | 2 | 0.939% | |
| 🕊 | 2 | 0.939% | |
| 😭 | 2 | 0.939% | |
| 🌚 | 1 | 0.469% | |
| 😢 | 1 | 0.469% | |
| 😴 | 1 | 0.469% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 213 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 2 May 2025 to 30 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
با سلام خدمت رفقای خودم امیدوارم تو این مدت بهترین پیشرفت و موفقیت هارو کسب کرده باشین🙏 خواستم بهتون اطلاع بدم که قراره یک دوره کامل ترک پورنوگرافی و ترک خودارضایی همراه با پشتیبانی و مشاوره تمام وقت برگزار بشه؛ عزیزانی که مایل هستند پیوی من اعلام کنند 👇 @COD_LAAND
👍2
موافق برگزاری ادامه جلسات صوتی هستید؟ 🤔
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🔥2
🚨 سراب تاریک🚨 ویکتوریا بئاتریز، بازیگر معروف فیلمهای پورن، در ۲۸ سالگی بهطور ناگهانی درگذشت... خانوادهاش تا روزهای آخر فقط التماس دعا میکردند، اما هیچ چیز نتوانست جلوی پایان تلخ او را بگیرد؛ این فرد با اجرای صحنه های انال بسیار زننده خودش رو به اوج رساند اما غافل از اینکه اوج گرفتن او مصادف است با سقوط هولناک در جهنم... ⚰️ پشت صحنه دنیای پورن، چیزی جز: ❌ بیماری ❌ افسردگی ❌ مرگ زودرس ❌بی بند باری ❌دوری از خدا …
😱9💔7🔥2😢1
چرا بعضی آدمها صبحها کلی کار میکنن، اما من همیشه تو خستگی آخر شب گیر میکنم؟ حقیقتش رو بخوای، منم یه مدت فکر میکردم آدمهای سحرخیز یه جورایی سوپرمنن... تا اینکه خودم آزمایشش کردم! اولش وحشتناک بود: - روز اول، ساعت ۶ صبح چشمام رو مالیدم و با خودم گفتم: «این چه شکنجهایه؟» - روز سوم، یه دفعه متوجه شدم ساعت ۸ صبح دو تا فصل از کتاب رو تموم کردم درحالی که قبلاً تو این وقت تازه بیدار میشدم! - بعد دو هفته، مغزم یه جو…
👍6👏4
مدیتیشن NLP (یا مدیتیشن مبتنی بر برنامهریزی عصبی-کلامی) ترکیبی از تکنیکهای مدیتیشن و NLP (برنامهریزی عصبی-کلامی) است که برای تقویت ذهن، کاهش استرس، تغییر الگوهای فکری منفی و دستیابی به اهداف شخصی طراحی شده است. 🔹 NLP چیست؟ NLP (Neuro-Linguistic Programming) روشی است که ارتباط بین ذهن (عصبی)، زبان (کلامی) و الگوهای رفتاری را بررسی میکند تا به افراد کمک کند با تغییر افکار و گفتار خود، نتایج بهتری در زندگی کسب کنن…
👍3
پاکی یه نبرد روزانه و لحظه ای هست، نه یه پیروزی همیشگی! این مسیر، پایان نداره... اینکه بگی «۹۰ روزه پاکم، دیگه تمومه» یه اشتباه بزرگه! چون به خودت مغرور میشی و این میشه مبدا لغزش... هر صبح که بیدار میشی، جنگ تازهای شروع میشه! یه جنگ بینِ اون کسی که میخوای باشی و اون کسی که قبلاً بودی! تو هر روز فقط دو راه داری: یا رو به جلو و اوج، یا سقوط به عقب و افول... یا سمت پاکی، یا غرق شدن تو ناپاکی! انتخاب با توئه! م…
👍9🔥1
بزن رو ترمز که تهش رو بار ها رفتی... 💔 #yes_i_can #no_porn @no_jaghe💎
🤣13👍7
مشتیا لفت ندین دیگه تا این عدد رند ایلومیناتی حفظ شه😂❤️
🔥11😱1
چطور جلوی وسوسه رو بگیری؟ با برنامهریزی برای محرکزدایی! بیش تر وسوسهها از یه جرقه شروع میشن: تنهایی... خستگی... گوشی دستته و حوصلهت سر رفته... تا ساعت۴ بامداد بیداری... اینا همون محرکها هستن؛ عاملهایی که راه رو برای لغزش باز میکنن. راهحل چیه؟ مدیریت محرکها! یعنی از قبل بدونی چه چیزایی تحریکت میکنه و محیطتو طوری بچینی که کمتر درگیرشون بشی و بزنی جاده خاکی. چند مثال کاربردی: مثال1⃣وقتی تنها میشی، قبلش ب…
👍9
بدترین حس یه ثانیه بعد لذت...💔 #fun #no_fap #yes_i_can @no_jaghe💎
👍9💔2😭2
#fun #no_fap #yes_i_can @no_jaghe💎
👍8
یه نفر هر روز ساعتها پورن میبینه ولی هنوز فکر میکنه معتاد نیست. اون به خودش میگه: «تا وقتی به کارام میرسم و چیزی در جسمم حس نمی کنم، مشکلی نداره.» حالا سوال اینه: کدوم اتفاق بیشتر از همه نشون میده که این فرد واقعاً دچار اعتیاد پنهانه؟🤔
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @no_jaghe. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
موافق برگزاری ادامه جلسات صوتی هستید؟ 🤔
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
یه نفر هر روز ساعتها پورن میبینه ولی هنوز فکر میکنه معتاد نیست. اون به خودش میگه: «تا وقتی به کارام میرسم و چیزی در جسمم حس نمی کنم، مشکلی نداره.» حالا سوال اینه: کدوم اتفاق بیشتر از همه نشون میده که این فرد واقعاً دچار اعتیاد پنهانه؟🤔
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
کی وسوسه منتهی به لغزش معمولا سراغت میاد؟ 🤔
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 2 May 2025 to 30 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝔻𝕦𝕤𝕥 𝘁𝗼 𝔻𝕚𝕒𝕞𝕠𝕟𝕕𝕤| ترک خودارضایی🔮” (@no_jaghe), 480 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/no_jaghe.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.