Channel
@no_god_please_nooo
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
105subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002140878638 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @no_god_please_nooo |
| Description | Канал о кино, театре, музыке, книгах и мероприятиях Куда пойти? Что сегодня посмотреть? С кем обсудить? Давайте к нам:) |
| Created | Between 1 December 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/no_god_please_nooo |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 09:01 | 105 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:15 | 105 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 4 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
97 reactions across 13 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 47 | 48.5% | |
| 🔥 | 28 | 28.9% | |
| 😁 | 11 | 11.3% | |
| 👍 | 10 | 10.3% | |
| 👀 | 1 | 1.03% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 97reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 4 February 2026 to 17 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
У меня есть кошка, Ева. Когда я впервые принесла ей когтеточку, в надежде что она отстанет от дивана и почувствует вкус царапанья поверхности без пиздюлей - она ее игнорила месяца четыре. Она не понимала, что я хочу, а я в свою очередь, смиренно пылесосила эту картонку каждую неделю. И вот, спустя время она наконец-то доперла для чего я ее туда сажала и что можно отрываться без последствий - и вошла во вкус. Так о ч…
🔥8❤3
Тест Сколько людей вы видите на фото?
😁5
Фраза, которой дышу последний год. Сходила на выставку в @gallery_way , о любви. Думала, выйду наполненной теплом и светом. Всё-таки любовь! А вышла с чем-то гораздо глубже. С чем-то, что тронуло, местами заболело, заставило почувствовать. И знаете… это оказалось хорошо. Любите себя. Не предавайте себя. Не теряйте себя никогда. И обязательно сходите на эту выставку ❤️
❤12🔥2
#фильм "Проект «Конец света»" Или "Проект «Аве Мария»", как вам больше нравится 😌 Вообще не хочется много говорить о фильме, это просто очень хорошее кино, кто смотрел - кулак в зад! Кто ещё не посмотрел, срочно включайте, и проведите это время с максимальной теплотой и любовью к происходящему ❤️ Восторг, восторг, восторг! 🗿👎🏻
❤11
Эффект бабочки (2004)
🔥2😁1
#фильм "Марти великолепный" Зря потраченные два с половиной часа, к кому обратиться, чтобы мне заплатили за просмотр этого фильма? 😁 Как вам?
😁5❤1
Я люблю зиму, но она далась мне как испытание, как продолжение прошлого года с его трудностями и хочется немного представить, будто с наступлением весны все станет легче и задорней 😜 А как прошла ваша зима? С уважением отношусь к этому непростому периоду, но мысленно чувствую себя так же, как в этом отрывке 😄 погнали дальше!
👍3🔥2❤1
Наткнулась на очень интересные мысли, ещё и с упражнениями по борьбе с этим, послушайте "Идите нахер, руминации" - фраза дня 👍
👍1
10 лет назад у меня был сложный период в жизни, и я пошла учится йоге и медитации, чтоб не ёбнуться. Тогда я впервые услышала про буддисткий концепт обезьяньего ума: «Наши мысли – как обезьянка, которая постоянно скачет и не может успокоиться. Цель медитаций – усмирить эту обезьянку». 2 года назад, в очередной сложный период, я решила получить новую профессию и начала читать много психологической литературы. В одной…
🔥4❤3👍1
про методы работы с руминациями
❤2🔥2
Теперь вопрос, стоит ли переименовать канал, это важно?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Друзья! У меня есть один вопрос, который не даёт покоя. Этот канал про кино и всё остальное, что можно посмотреть/почитать (хотя ни одной книги я ещё не посоветовала, дурында 🫠). И мне хочется делиться здесь и другими вещами, которые мне интересны. Но внутренний критик шепчет: «Ну это же канал про кино… кому нужно всё остальное? Ты же не блогер». Я долго его слушала. А сегодня решила — плевать. Пусть канал расширя…
❤11👍2🔥2👀1
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @no_god_please_nooo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Теперь вопрос, стоит ли переименовать канал, это важно?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 4 February 2026 to 17 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
@no_god_please_nooo named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Не сегодня” (@no_god_please_nooo), 105 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/no_god_please_nooo.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.