Channel
@no_erid
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
12subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001135021799 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @no_erid |
| Description | Выявляем рекламу, опубликованную без обязательной маркировки ERID. Особо отличившиеся будут зафиксированы здесь |
| Created | Between 1 June 2017 and 31 August 2020— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/no_erid |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 06:01 | 12 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:10 | 12 | first reading |
8 posts held, back to 27 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
⚡️ФАС России выявила признаки нарушения рекламного законодательства в социальных сетях - Instagram (запрещен в России; принадлежит корпорации Meta, признанной в РФ экстремистской), Facebook (запрещен в России, принадлежит корпорации Meta, признанной в РФ экстремистской), YouTube, Telegram и WhatsApp (запрещен в России, принадлежит корпорации Meta, признанной в РФ экстремистской) - в случае размещения рекламы на этих …
Серия рекламных постов с "прогревами" от блогера Smaglianna blog про новую схему питания для похудения. Само собой все без обязательной маркировки. Никакой информации с предупреждениями о возможном вреде тоже нет. https://t.me/smagliana/783
Давно не виделись. Блогер aleksa182s продолжает выкладывать топорную рекламу в блоге без маркировки. Более того, с ссылками на запрещенную в РВ соцсеть, где проводится рекламный розыгрыш (а это уже отдельная статья) https://t.me/aleksa182s
Фото изобилия на вашем праздничном столе может стать предметом пристального внимания ФНС. Эксперт Андрей Бархота объяснил «Абзацу»: налоговики умеют сопоставлять официальные доходы граждан с уровнем потребления, изучая публикации в социальных сетях. Например, показывая изысканные блюда и дорогие напитки, вы можете случайно подтвердить свои скрытые активы. Вот простой пример: зарплата — всего 35 тысяч рублей, а праз…
Рекламный пост сети фитнес-клубов в блоге Aleksa182 без обязательной маркировки https://t.me/aleksa182s/3723
Срочная новость. Блогер Ирина Лилло продолжает без палева размещать рекламные посты без маркировки https://t.me/irina_lillo/5768
Бывшая бизнес-омбудсмен Лариса Невидайло (вроде, должна знать законодательство) репостит в своем блоге рекламную запись кафе "Техникум" без обязательной маркировки https://t.me/lk_nevidaylo/6122
Новичок в нашем рейтинге. Блогер Наталья Девяткова | Деньги в квадрате размещает рекламный пост без обязательной маркировки https://t.me/dengivkvadrate2/4454
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @no_erid. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Без маркировки” (@no_erid), 12 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/no_erid.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.