Channel
@nnptrv
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
668subscribers
+4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001788109538 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @nnptrv |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/nnptrv |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 17:19 | 668 | +4 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:35 | 664 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:45 | 664 | first reading |
10 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 10 (30 July 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,064 |
| Reactions total | 337 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 02:35 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
337 reactions across 10 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5343624750054779157 | 92 | 27.3% | |
| custom 5220093437558155710 | 63 | 18.7% | |
| custom 5300902431188595212 | 56 | 16.6% | |
| custom 5465602315182437524 | 48 | 14.2% | |
| custom 5312009422774486807 | 30 | 8.90% | |
| custom 5467891429671989462 | 30 | 8.90% | |
| custom 5249198992109094130 | 18 | 5.34% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 337reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
сегодня на странных вайбах⚡️ били мой точечный орнамент, вышло…ну очень круто последнее время чет просыпаюсь и мало сил, то ли жара меня так изнуряет, то ли организм требует железа…📌 мне срочно нужна таблетка нзт, но без побочный эффектов ахаха😋 на какое существо я похожа на третьем фото?
custom 546789142967198946211custom 522009343755815571010custom 53436247500547791577
Signed n
на воодушевлении от этой работы рисую похожие нежные, но яркие эскизы🌺 ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• надеюсь вам нравится так же, как и мне!!!
custom 53436247500547791578custom 52200934375581557104custom 54656023151824375244
Signed n
я просто влюблена в эту татуировку🍃 она безумно подходит моей клиенточке скейтерше😋 и наконец-то поработала на этом месте, безумно податливая и нежная кожа, хочу больше подобных работ! #татуннптрв
custom 52200934375581557109custom 52491989921090941307custom 54656023151824375247
Signed n
еще в начале года я пробовала себя в новой стилистике и рисовала всякие скетчи из этого наброска вышел очень милый эскиз 🌱 за это время скилл и насмотренность выросли и поэтому сегодня вы увидите этот рисунок на коже в новом видении📌
custom 53436247500547791576custom 52200934375581557105custom 54656023151824375244custom 53120094227744868072
Signed n
сегодня кололи мой розовенький эскизик ^_^ мне все больше нравятся розовые тату и моя коллекция красок пополнилась еще несколькими оттенками🌸 за 4 часа закатали весь меч плотненько в розовый ждете дроп????😋
custom 534362475005477915714custom 53009024311885952127custom 54656023151824375247
Signed n
🌺точечная ботаника🌺 мне очень нравится как, такие картинки выглядят на коже⭐️ это крайний эскиз в таком стиле! новые буду делать уже когда разберут часть этих (процесс кстати уже пошел) забронировать эскиз @nnptrvtattoo
custom 52200934375581557109custom 53009024311885952129custom 53436247500547791578
Signed n
как же красиво смотрится красная краска на бледной коже🔺 во время сеанса узнала, что оказывается паучьи лилии сажают на кладбище в Японии это была первая тату клиента и он до конца сеанса был уверен, что вазелин это обезбол))) вы так часто мне поднимаете настроение своими приколами на сеансах, после каждой татушки заряжаюсь вашими энергией и вайбом🔴 #татуннптрв
custom 546560231518243752410custom 53436247500547791579custom 52200934375581557108
Signed n
почему то после моей недельный депрессии стало меньше реакций((( вы хотите чтобы я в нее вернулась???? они ничего не значат, но чем их больше, тем на душе теплее😋😋😋
custom 530090243118859521218custom 531200942277448680717custom 534362475005477915715custom 54656023151824375247custom 52491989921090941306
Signed n
аааааа скоро вас ждет такой красочный дроп… как же кайфово, когда встречаю таких же фанатов южного парка, как я
custom 534362475005477915725custom 530090243118859521219custom 546789142967198946219custom 52200934375581557109
Signed n
поселила еще одну кислотную лягушку на кожу🐸 кайфую от того, что вы мне доверяете и разрешаете полет фантазии в эскизах и работе👾🌈 безумно приятно осознавать, что твое творчество потихоньку замечает больше людей и оно им тоже нравится!!! ⭐️всем пис⭐️
custom 531200942277448680711custom 52200934375581557109custom 54656023151824375249custom 52491989921090941305custom 53009024311885952123
Signed n
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @nnptrv. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,097,405 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ннптрв мастер иглы” (@nnptrv), 668 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nnptrv.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.