👅 ph: https://t.me/Kiraphotomih
custom 530090429090945176813custom 53751988585339553449custom 54360264831874090519custom 52177826807284023412custom 52582300327273086502custom 53773517796105436452custom 53011383494472157061custom 53031461006292060791

Channel
@nnixxie
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
171subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002012572840 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @nnixxie |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/nnixxie |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 05:03 | 171 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 20:02 | 171 | first reading |
7 posts held, back to 30 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 7 (30 May 2026 – 31 July 2026) |
| Views total | 490 |
| Reactions total | 40 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 20:02 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
219 reactions across 7 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 17.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5217666583467424067 | 38 | 17.4% | |
| custom 5300904290909451768 | 38 | 17.4% | |
| custom 5217782680728402341 | 24 | 11.0% | |
| custom 5258230032727308650 | 24 | 11.0% | |
| custom 5301138349447215706 | 24 | 11.0% | |
| custom 5300844006748484835 | 16 | 7.31% | |
| custom 5303146100629206079 | 14 | 6.39% | |
| custom 5375198858533955344 | 10 | 4.57% | |
| custom 5436026483187409051 | 10 | 4.57% | |
| custom 5217815812106122858 | 8 | 3.65% | |
| custom 5377351779610543645 | 7 | 3.20% | |
| custom 5301002486746738922 | 4 | 1.83% | |
| custom 5217424643664666058 | 1 | 0.457% | |
| custom 5375431710185906651 | 1 | 0.457% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 219reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 30 May 2026 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @nnixxie. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 7 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 May 2026 to 31 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
👅 ph: https://t.me/Kiraphotomih
custom 530090429090945176813custom 53751988585339553449custom 54360264831874090519custom 52177826807284023412custom 52582300327273086502custom 53773517796105436452custom 53011383494472157061custom 53031461006292060791
я никогда не буду встречаться
custom 53773517796105436455custom 53751988585339553441custom 54360264831874090511
Photo, posted without a caption
custom 530090429090945176821custom 521766658346742406710custom 53011383494472157069custom 52177826807284023412custom 52174246436646660581custom 52178158121061228581custom 52582300327273086501custom 53010024867467389221
Photo, posted without a caption
custom 525823003272730865015custom 52176665834674240679custom 53031461006292060798custom 52177826807284023412custom 52178158121061228582custom 53009042909094517682custom 53011383494472157061
🪷
custom 521766658346742406718custom 530113834944721570613custom 521778268072840234111custom 52582300327273086501custom 53008440067484848351custom 53009042909094517681custom 53010024867467389221custom 53031461006292060791
Video message, posted without a caption
custom 52582300327273086504custom 53008440067484848352custom 53031461006292060792
🏫
custom 530084400674848483513custom 52177826807284023417custom 52178158121061228585custom 53010024867467389222custom 52176665834674240671custom 52582300327273086501custom 53009042909094517681custom 53031461006292060791
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @nnixxie. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 566,482 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“никси” (@nnixxie), 171 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nnixxie.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.