Channel
@nkodw
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
147subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001890595341 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @nkodw |
| Description | new keys open different ways: новые ключи открывают разные пути Субъективщина на разные темы вокруг и около: философия, ит, тео, триз, финтех, финансы, кодинг, техника и пр. Консультации и донаты: https://pay.cloudtips.ru/p/98d88f69 Админ: @mds1nt |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/nkodw |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 20:46 | 147 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:46 | 147 | first reading |
10 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 10 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 10 (5 August 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 295 |
| Reactions total | 14 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 20:46 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
14 reactions across 7 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 4 | 28.6% | |
| custom 4956432834140046139 | 3 | 21.4% | |
| 🔥 | 3 | 21.4% | |
| ❤ | 2 | 14.3% | |
| 😁 | 2 | 14.3% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 14reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Начало Система быстрых платежей — это ответ #финтех -отрасли и #ЦБ на дорогой и медленный платёжный рынок начала 2010-х. Запущенная в 2019 году, она превратилась из простого сервиса переводов по номеру телефона в национальную платёжную платформу, обрабатывающую миллиарды транзакций в год. 4 способа использования СБП QR-оплата — самый популярный сценарий для офлайн-торговли. Динамический QR-код генерируется под конкр…
поздневечерний #бег после перерыва. 5 норм, 10 тоже пойдет, а вот больше уже было влом. Плейлист: уличный парковый шум, немного #rammstein, #TheCranberries и др
🔥1
#зряБыканул - будет новый тег. Да, тут ошибся с выводами в части платного Pro -аккаунта #cursor. Спасибо @lsvmo и коллегам закинули рецепт как намутить норм доступ к Pro версии, эксперименты продолжаются. Однако про инфоЦыг, парящих на курсах непроверенные аккаунты для покупки доступа- актуальное замечание
👍2😁1
#ключи_на_ходу #программизм поковырял я этот их #cursor ide среду разработки, которая типа вся #ии пока для моих задач ее бесплатная версия не оч так по сравнению с #deepseek. Да ещё и не даёт внешние api ии-агентов подключать., только в платной, что шлак ибо делать огороды с зарубежными картами мне влом. Хз какие странные продавцы аккаунтов, лучше пучок акций Сбера куплю. За проф режим курсора топят только разные ин…
👍1
#авиа Пятничное и авиационное: В 97 лет бабушка из Англии пролетела на крыле самолёта и установила новый рекорд. Ранее Бетти Бромаж уже была известна как самая пожилая женщина, которая занимается таким видом спорта. Год назад бабушка пережила инсульт, что не помешало ей вновь забраться на крыло самолёта. И это даже не нейросеть) В этот раз Бетти надо было провести в воздухе пять минут, с чем она успешно справилась.…
❤1
#кодинг #программизм Для «Колеса баланса» прикрутил сохранение ранее введенных параметров колсе в облачную БД в среде #firebase от #google. Данные храняться в нетабличном/#nosql виде - как #json-файлы вида «ключ-параметр: значание». Для таких проектов и хранения истории пользователя это быстрее и удобнее. Теперь есть история колес)) Возможно подумаю как отображать ее изменения со временем Поддержать канал
👍1
#ключи_на_ходу шифровальные: ежели вам надо добить мозг в пятницу, то лучше вот этим. #crypto #криптография #головоломка тема: фильм #матрица, слова связаны с #иб и #ит. Не оч специфические, слышали их все, и даже произносили. Такой вот мозгоПоловойАкт приобщения к взлому шифров. Ответы и вопросы можно в комменты Поддержать канал
@palantirstellarnetwork «Технологическая республика». Автор - Александр С. #Карп, #Палантир Автор открыто топит за боевое применение #ИИ, что кстати уже сделано в дроне #Hornet, мб по нему сделаю обзор позже: «Наша нерешительность в продвижении военного применения искусственного интеллекта, реальная или воображаемая, может обернуться для нас наказанием. Умение разрабатывать инструменты для применения силы, поддержива…
#ключи_на_ходу а может… #ключи_от_дурки Ойтишные: вот #кодинг и даже не #программизм за примерно часа 2 без знания #JavaScript и прочего донного кала в виде #CSS и стилей. А главное без печати киллометров тегов. Делалось через промты, кофе, немного мата и тз для #DeepSeek, руками только задеплоил - выложил в сеть. Ну как задеплоил - перетащил файлы прямо мышью в хостинг и все. Для проверки минимального продукта #mvp …
❤1
#ключи_на_ходу судоходном! Таки сходил на этот ваш #тимбилдинг, в целом – зачет, оценка 1000 сухопутных крыс из 1000 морских. Все бодрые, не душные, что для таких специализаций часто редкость. Никто не стремился накидаться в минимально короткий срок, да и вообще. Так вот, все происходило в виде регаты, это прям на бАгатом, что тоже плюс, ибо причастность к символу никто не отменял, механизм рабочий. Регата – это така…
custom 49564328341400461393🔥2😁1
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @nkodw. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 859,172 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“n.k.o.d.w.” (@nkodw), 147 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nkodw.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.