Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Книги Надежды 📚✨

@nk_reading

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

457subscribers

+6 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002231580279
TypeChannel
Username@nk_reading
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/nk_reading

Growth

4514574546 August 2026 — 451 subscribers6 August 2026 — 451 subscribers14 August 2026 — 457 subscribers6 August 202614 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 8 days, net +6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 450–458 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 07:17457+6
6 Aug 2026, 19:15451no change
6 Aug 2026, 18:48451first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 26 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
32.3%
avg views ÷ 457 subscribers
Avg views / post
147
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
35.0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held19 (26 July 20266 August 2026)
Views total2,801
Reactions total979
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 19:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

979 reactions across 19 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥30531.2%
28829.4%
🥰13313.6%
😁10610.8%
🤣838.48%
❤‍🔥282.86%
👍141.43%
💯141.43%
👏80.817%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 979reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
4
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 19 we hold a reading for · 21%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @nk_reading. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 26 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 14:07 UTC53 views34 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Васька был пойман на месте преступления, но желание рассматривать книги не пропало 😅 Покажите ему, что читаете сейчас 📚🐾

😁16🔥11❤‍🔥6👍1

6 Aug 2026, 04:57 UTC87 views40 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

Как часто читаете классику? 😏 #юмор

🤣24🔥10🥰6

5 Aug 2026, 14:07 UTC96 views31 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Тата Алатова «Чокнутая будущая» 🤩 🤩 Что говорит аннотация: Знать свое будущее наперед - это хорошо или плохо? Мирослава Видящая, потомственная гадалка, всегда считала: предупрежден - значит вооружен. Но что делать, если твое «завтра и навсегда» тебе категорически не нравится? Мужчина твоей судьбы совершенно не тот, ведет себя совершенно не так и вообще скользкий тип? Он смотрит на тебя как на пустое место, а ты точ

🔥1311👏5🥰2

5 Aug 2026, 09:37 UTC99 views15 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Poll

У меня к вам важный вопрос: возвращаем рубрику с интересными фактами про писателей?

  1. Да95%
  2. Нет5%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

10👍4🥰1

5 Aug 2026, 04:57 UTC109 views44 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Какую книгу ждете? 😏 #юмор

19😁14🔥11

4 Aug 2026, 14:07 UTC115 views65 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Побег из Шоушенка #КНИГАvsФИЛЬМ Тот самый случай, когда небольшая повесть в умелых руках превратилась в масштабную картину 🎥 Как вы помните, мне понравилась книга, я полностью погрузилась в атмосферу и подружилась с героями 🔥 Фильм безукоризненно передал обстановку и характеры персонажей. Снято красиво, даже не верится, что экранизации больше 30ти лет! Да, по сюжету что-то сделали чуть иначе, но это стало только

28🔥23🥰14

4 Aug 2026, 04:57 UTC119 views61 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Спонсор моих бессонных ночей — включенная лампа 🫠😅 #юмор

😁3016❤‍🔥11💯2🤣2

3 Aug 2026, 11:37 UTC129 views69 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Posted without readable text

🔥3718🥰14

3 Aug 2026, 04:57 UTC126 views57 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

В каком жанре ваша история? 😏 #юмор

🔥3015🥰11💯1

31 Jul 2026, 18:18 UTC173 views53 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

26🔥14🥰10👏3

31 Jul 2026, 04:57 UTC182 views51 reactions1 Starread 6 August 2026
Photo

Какой у вас эмодзи сегодня? 😏 Можно придумывать свои, ни в чем себе не отказывайте 😁 #юмор

🥰2514🔥12

30 Jul 2026, 04:57 UTC198 views61 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Если вы до сих пор не читали эту книгу, тогда я иду к вам! 🤩 Мечта — это хорошо. Мечта у человека исполняться должна Меня вдруг стали мучить вопросы — простые вопросы, которые вчера еще были мне абсолютно ясны: а что, собственно, происходит на земле, что случилось в жизни, куда она идет? И я, грамотный, культурный человек, интеллигент, — я когда-то преподавал в гимназии, я учил детей добру, человечности, справедлив

31🔥19👍9🥰2

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @nk_reading. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

5 Aug 2026, 09:37 UTCAnonymous Poll42 voters

У меня к вам важный вопрос: возвращаем рубрику с интересными фактами про писателей?

  1. Да95%
  2. Нет5%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 920,523 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Книги Надежды 📚✨” (@nk_reading), 457 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nk_reading.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.