Channel
@niyso_eng
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
790subscribers
+9 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002139747571 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @niyso_eng |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 24 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 24 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/niyso_eng |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 24 Aug 2026, 19:39 | 790 | +12 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 18:15 | 778 | -3 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:47 | 781 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:49 | 781 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 22 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 6 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 11 (22 July 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 769 |
| Reactions total | 11 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 01:47 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
35 reactions across 10 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🤬 | 9 | 25.7% | |
| 😢 | 7 | 20.0% | |
| 👏 | 5 | 14.3% | |
| 💔 | 5 | 14.3% | |
| 🔥 | 5 | 14.3% | |
| 😁 | 2 | 5.71% | |
| ❤ | 1 | 2.86% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 2.86% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 35reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Natives of occupied Chechnya who work in Russian regions and had been planning to return home soon have started cancelling their trips. The reason is fear of getting caught in the next wave of mobilization and forced conscription for the war. Even though mobilization is being planned across Russia as a whole, Chechens are choosing to stay outside Chechnya until the situation becomes clearer. As paradoxical as it sou…
🤬3
🔴According to sources, two young men who had arrived on one of the incoming flights were abducted yesterday at Grozny airport. Personnel from the occupation structures detained them right on airport grounds and took them away to an unknown location. The identities of those abducted, the reasons for their detention, and their subsequent fate remain unknown at this time.
Is Tourism Saving or Ruining Dagestan? Check out our new Shorts: 🔗 https://www.youtube.com/shorts/nto5e8wbo6I
❤1
But the occupiers don't stage these actions for no reason. For them, it's crucial to instill fear in the population, since that's the primary tool for maintaining Russian rule over the peoples of the Caucasus. Their whole bet is that by suppressing even the slightest signs of resistance in the harshest possible manner, they'll beat out of the population any thought of struggling against the occupation. However, sust…
🤬2
The clowns from the 'FSB' circus are in action. To detain a resident who allegedly left some comment on social media, the occupiers had to stage an entire show. And mind you, his guilt hasn't even been proven — we're only talking about suspicions here. Good thing they didn't roll in a tank.
🤬2
The heretic and sectarian Ali Jifri is a friend again. Recently, Kadyrov's sons, together with FSB mullah Adam Shahidov, met with Jifri in one of the Arab countries. Judging by the photos, a deeply intellectual and spiritual conversation was underway. A reminder: after the scandalous 2016 conference in Grozny, whose results Jifri later disavowed, he has not set foot in occupied Chechnya for ten years.
😁2🤔1
🔴 It is reported that Sultan Tushayev, a 50-year-old resident of the village of Assinovskaya, has been abducted by the Russian regime. He is currently being held at the OMVD (District Department of Internal Affairs) for Sernovodsky District. The man lived an ordinary life, "kept his mouth shut," and "stayed out of politics." But hungry operatives carrying out orders from the FSB don't need someone to actually be gui…
😢3
Good people who had been planning an operation on the 'Kavkaz' highway near the Chernorechenskoye checkpoint shared some insider details. As the footage shows, reconnaissance of the site was carried out beforehand, including at night using night-vision devices. As the main 'gift,' they chose TNT packed with a fragmentation element. As previously reported, the plan was to mount a 'Mukha' (RPG-18) on a timer a short di…
🔥5
"Iron" Hussein Isabayev and the Corpse-Eaters A field commander who fought through both Chechen wars, defended Grozny, and was killed in a 2002 ambush near the Georgian border — his body never returned. Written by Vakha Ibragimov, former advisor to President Dzhokhar Dudayev. Translated by NIYSO English. Read Now on our Substack: https://open.substack.com/pub/niyso/p/iron-hussein-isabayev-and-the-corpse?r=8mjs03&ut…
👏5
In 2022, construction workers near Oyskhara reportedly discovered human remains not far from the site of a former Russian military base that operated during the war. Instead of launching a full-scale investigation, involving forensic authorities, informing the public, and using the discovery to document the methods by which Russia established so-called "constitutional order" in Chechnya, Kadyrov's authorities report…
😢4🤬2
The Russian occupation regime has found itself yet another "important" mission: searching for the remains of Soviet soldiers—even in areas where no frontline battles with the German army ever took place. Why this would matter to indigenious inhabitants remains an open question. At the same time, the Kremlin-backed authorities have shown little interest in searching for the remains of the thousands of ethnic Chechens…
💔5
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @niyso_eng. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 442,100 of 1,621,120entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“NIYSO English” (@niyso_eng), 790 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/niyso_eng.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.