Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

❕//: ❮ ɴɪᴛᴇ⬦ʀɪsᴇ ❯ « ☁️

@niterisee

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

84subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002635651825
TypeChannel
Username@niterisee
Description• °.•⌬❕〔 .🫧 . 〕❕ ⌬•.° • ☁️ » ᴀɴ ᴏʀɪɢɪɴᴀʟ ᴍɪɴᴇᴄʀᴀꜰᴛ ᴍɪɴᴇ-ɪᴍᴀᴛᴏʀ ᴄʀᴇᴀᴛɪᴠᴇ ᴀᴜᴛʜᴏʀ 🫐 ⋯─ ─── ───── ─ ─⋯ 🌊 » 2D ᴀʀᴛɪsᴛ/ᴅᴇsɪɢɴᴇʀ/ᴘʀᴏɢʀᴀᴍᴍᴇʀ❕ .⌬🎐" 〃(๑ › ᆺ ‹ )°- 🌙!
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/niterisee

Growth

847 August 2026 — 84 subscribers9 August 2026 — 84 subscribers7 August 20269 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 3 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 83–85 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 17:1584no change
7 Aug 2026, 00:3384first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 21 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
206.5%
avg views ÷ 84 subscribers
Avg views / post
174
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
13.0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held20 (21 April 20266 August 2026)
Views total347
Reactions total45
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 17:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
25
Links
7

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

233 reactions across 16 posts, in 23 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 52355891641660323245021.5%
custom 52336707397138614534418.9%
custom 5467913050537363967166.87%
custom 5399827803032026505156.44%
custom 5445275244287797823146.01%
custom 5226469552732279877114.72%
custom 5397636021091343911114.72%
custom 534174799537534501893.86%
custom 539578666400826007093.86%
custom 546773376142256135593.86%
custom 537109242741735147583.43%
custom 536409551767027675962.58%
custom 539540361734996541852.15%
custom 528069770243739345941.72%
custom 533953791687397502741.72%
custom 539796845585501937641.72%
custom 546070882701387902941.72%
custom 528073844879213324131.29%
custom 523565023860099367420.858%
custom 539797319320392654820.858%
3 further kinds31.29%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 233reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 April 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
307
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 16 we hold a reading for · 19%
Most on one post
300
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @niterisee. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 21 April 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 13:31 UTC80 views17 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Posted without readable text

custom 54452752442877978239custom 53417479953753450184custom 53395379168739750273custom 52355891641660323241

6 Aug 2026, 13:30 UTC267 views19 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Posted without readable text

custom 523558916416603232411custom 54452752442877978235custom 53417479953753450183

29 Jul 2026, 17:21 UTCviews —9 reactions2 Starsread 9 August 2026

Posted without readable text

custom 53957866640082600707custom 52355891641660323241custom 53413773654675052711

2 Jul 2026, 10:42 UTC281 views9 reactionsread 9 August 2026

˖ [ ПЕРЕДАЧА ЭСТАФЕТЫ ОТ ЛИРЫ ] ˖ ◤ ───────────────────── ❔ » Суть эстафеты: нужно упомянуть и написать, что бы ты сделал с человеком, передавшим тебе эстафету. ˖ [ МОЙ ОТВЕТ… ] ˖ 🛌 » …Я мягко возьму тебя за руку, и отведу в наш шатер из одеял. Там, под уютным светом фонарика, я напою тебя горячим какао, укутаю пледом и сяду напротив, слушая, как прошёл твой день…🦋 ˖ ࣪ ⊹ ◤ ───────────────────── ˖ [ ПЕРЕДАЮ… ] ˖ Он

custom 52355891641660323246custom 53395379168739750271custom 53417479953753450181custom 54677337614225613551

29 Jun 2026, 20:26 UTC278 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

custom 52355891641660323242custom 53954036173499654182custom 54677337614225613552custom 53417479953753450181

29 Jun 2026, 20:26 UTC465 views17 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

• °.⊹ ࣪ ˖〔 . ❌ . 〕˖ ࣪ ⊹.° • ◤ ────────────────── — Я просто хочу помочь тебе… — …Я знаю.

custom 53710924274173514758custom 53640955176702767594custom 52807384487921332412custom 53979731932039265482custom 52355891641660323241

15 Jun 2026, 14:19 UTC286 views8 reactionsread 9 August 2026

🥹 » …Теперь какое-то время я буду зелёненькой ⚪ ˖ ࣪ ⊹ P.S.: Скажем так: летний ивент длиной в лето 🥹

custom 52264695527322798774custom 52336707397138614531custom 52806977024373934591custom 54048073580502292881custom 54677337614225613551

15 Jun 2026, 14:10 UTC234 views9 reactionsread 9 August 2026

❔ » Как думаете, дропнуть ли это в спирит? Ну так, чисто по приколу? ˖ ࣪ ⊹

custom 522646955273227987771custom 52806977024373934591

15 Jun 2026, 14:07 UTC472 views14 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

• °.⊹ ࣪ ˖ 〔 🍀 〕 ˖ ࣪ ⊹.° • ◤ ───────────────────── ⚪ » Юююху! ˖ ࣪ ⊹ . ⚪ » Последний экзамен сдан (наконец-то). Сессия успешно окончена. И сейчас я хочу поделиться с вами мини-стори, которая сделала мой день: . ◤ ───────────────────── ⚪ » Сегодня была пересдача экза (мы до этого уже писали). Лично я тогда писала контрольную, ведь без нее меня не допустят, а я так и не сдала ей эти гребаные интегралы. Я морально готов

custom 52355891641660323248custom 53954036173499654182custom 54679130505373639672custom 52336707397138614531custom 52806977024373934591

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @niterisee. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

21 Apr 2026, 05:31 UTCFinal Results41 voters

[ ⚠️ » ВНИМАНИЕ ВОПРОС ] ◤ ───────────────────── …Хотите ли вы, чтобы я сделала ~ЩитПост?~ 🌙 ˖ ࣪ ⊹ ❌ » Он будет создан как отдельный закрытый канал, где я буду выкладывать всякую фигню, не засоряя основной ТГК 👩‍🎓 😀 » Что думаете? Делаем? �

  1. 😱 » Го ˖ ࣪ ⊹85%
  2. 😨 » Не го ˖ ࣪ ⊹15%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 April 2026 to 6 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 705,840 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“❕//: ❮ ɴɪᴛᴇ⬦ʀɪsᴇ ❯ « ☁️” (@niterisee), 84 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/niterisee.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.