Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 𝓝 𝗂𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗇d͟o ♡゙ ݁

Channel

𝓝 𝗂𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗇d͟o ♡゙ ݁

@nintfel

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

157subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003876077525
TypeChannel
Username@nintfel
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 30 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded13 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/nintfel

Growth

15713 Aug 2026, 12:02 — 157 subscribers14 Aug 2026, 03:14 — 157 subscribers13 Aug 2026, 12:0214 Aug 2026, 03:14
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 156–158 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 03:14157no change
13 Aug 2026, 12:02157first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 20 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
166.6%
avg views ÷ 157 subscribers
Avg views / post
262
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
31.3%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held20 (20 July 202611 August 2026)
Views total5,230
Reactions total533
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Aug 2026, 12:02 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

533 reactions across 4 posts, in 31 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 8.63% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 5287516980927030906468.63%
custom 5424981158741977281468.63%
custom 5215279934565544764458.44%
custom 5215617652138994118438.07%
custom 5325580437098098879438.07%
custom 5258244528241912938417.69%
custom 5310068028837228950417.69%
custom 5316667323396943502417.69%
custom 5406878189416913176387.13%
custom 5204075107919631866336.19%
custom 5204058460626392676326.00%
custom 5204451415774236195305.63%
custom 521790425836764584840.75%
custom 525798922250093900140.75%
custom 528748679160190564740.75%
custom 532804911558036585540.75%
custom 541798688610480389640.75%
custom 542507807038403179840.75%
custom 542720697400351425140.75%
custom 520440397356548381330.563%
11 further kinds234.32%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 533reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
23
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 20 we hold a reading for · 20%
Most on one post
10
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @nintfel. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 20 July 2026 to 11 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 22:53 UTC117 views109 reactions1 Starread 13 August 2026
Photo

🥹 🥹 🔠𝖼𝗈𝗎𝗅𝖽 𝗀𝗂𝗏𝖾 𝖺 𝖿𝗎𝖼𝗄 𝖺𝖻𝗈𝗎𝗍 𝗇𝗈 𝗁𝖺𝗍𝖾𝗋 🔠𝗈𝗇𝗀 𝖺𝗌 𝗆𝗒 𝖻𝗂𝗍𝖼𝗁𝖾𝗌 𝗅𝗈𝗏𝖾 𝗆𝖾 🩸 直子 ִ 🥹 ᅟᅟᅟ🥹𝖮 𝖱 𝖣 𝖤 𝖱 — 25 ⭐️ — 𝖱 𝖤 𝖵 𝖨 𝖤 𝖶

custom 520407510791963186633custom 520405846062639267632custom 520445141577423619530custom 54272069740035142514custom 52044039735654838133custom 54293951009270366223custom 52044325780476770002custom 54271587372258133252

1 Aug 2026, 17:59 UTC412 views146 reactions10 Starsread 13 August 2026
Photo

🥹 🥹 🔠𝗂𝗍𝗁 𝖺 𝗍𝖺𝗌𝗍𝖾 𝗈𝖿 𝗒𝗈𝗎𝗋 𝗉𝗈𝗂𝗌𝗈𝗇 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺𝖽𝗂𝗌𝖾. 𝖨'𝗆 𝖺𝖽𝖽𝗂𝖼𝗍𝖾𝖽 𝗍𝗈 𝗒𝗈𝗎 🎈 直子 ִ 🥹

custom 528751698092703090646custom 542498115874197728146custom 540687818941691317638custom 52179042583676458484custom 52874867916019056474custom 53280491155803658554custom 54179868861048038964

25 Jul 2026, 09:15 UTC367 views140 reactions2 Starsread 13 August 2026
Photo

🥹 🥹 🤩𝖺𝗎𝗌𝖾 𝖺𝗅𝗅 𝖨 𝗇𝖾𝖾𝖽 𝗍𝗁𝗂𝗌 𝗌𝗎𝗆𝗆𝖾𝗋. 𝖨𝗌 𝖺 𝗅𝗂𝗍𝗍𝗅𝖾 𝖻𝗂𝗍 𝗅𝖾𝗌𝗌 𝗍𝗁𝖺𝗇 𝖺 𝗅𝗈𝗏𝖾𝗋 🍹 直子 ִ 🥹

custom 521527993456554476445custom 525824452824191293841custom 531006802883722895041custom 52579892225009390014custom 54250780703840317984custom 54250284377419650223custom 54561860074078553222

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @nintfel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,068,604 of 1,549,704entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝓝 𝗂𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗇d͟o ♡゙ ݁” (@nintfel), 157 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nintfel.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.