3 measurements spanning 8 days, net -5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 379–386 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
13 Aug 2026, 16:28
380
-5
6 Aug 2026, 20:17
385
no change
5 Aug 2026, 22:10
385
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 23 May 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
924 reactions across 20 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🤣
292
31.6%
custom 4929664772590273383
283
30.6%
custom 5411317029527374985
146
15.8%
❤
79
8.55%
👍
44
4.76%
🥰
19
2.06%
😁
18
1.95%
👻
9
0.974%
🔥
8
0.866%
😈
7
0.758%
👌
4
0.433%
🫡
4
0.433%
❤🔥
3
0.325%
🍓
2
0.216%
💊
2
0.216%
👎
1
0.108%
👏
1
0.108%
😡
1
0.108%
🙏
1
0.108%
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 924reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 23 May 2025 to 28 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
165
across the posts below
Posts paid on
12
of 20 we hold a reading for · 60%
Most on one post
102
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ninihayesayberi. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 23 May 2025 to 28 January 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
ای ایران ای مرز پر گهر
ای خاکت سرچشمه هنر
دور از تو اندیشه بدان
پاینده مانی و جاودان
ای دشمن ار تو سنگ خارهای من آهنم
جان من فدای خاک پاک میهنم
مهر تو چون شد پیشهام
دور از تو نیست اندیشهام
در راه تو کی ارزشی دارد این جان ما
پاینده باد خاک ایران ما
@ninihayesayberi
آمار سال 2025 کانال نینی های سایبری🍬🦋⭐️💞🍓💋
تشکر میکنم از دوستانی که از کانال حمایت میکنن🙂
🔝محبوبترین پست
عاشقانه های جرج کبیر و حسین رستگار 🥰
🔝محبوبترین ری اکشن 🤣
میو🙂
🔤@ninihayesayberi
یه نفرقبلاً تو پروژه پانزی بود. بعد ازاینکه پروژه تو ایران جمع شدسرمایهشو از دست داد وعضو گروه مبارزه با جرایم سایبری شد و متوجه شدکلاهبرداری بوده، اما یه ماه بعد دوباره رفته سراغ همون پروژه تو یه کشوردیگه ومیگه: برگشتم پولمو پس بگیرم.
این کار اسمش چیه؟
1️⃣نشونه ی هوش بالاست، فقط اشتباهی ازش استفاده کرده9%
2️⃣خودش الان بخشی از کلاهبرداریه20%
3️⃣دلش برای خودش سوخته بود، ولی برای اعضای جدید نه8%
4️⃣به خیال خودش کارش درسته، ولی با لیدر کلاهبردار فرقی نداشته10%
5️⃣اوج ساده لوحی و خودفریبی بوده5%
6️⃣قربانی جدیدِ توهمِ جبران ضرر14%
7️⃣هیچوقت فکر نمیکردم همچین شخصی، یه روزی ادمین گروه مبارزه با جرایم سایبری بشه33%
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
یه تقلب ریز برای کلاهبردارها...🌸
برای دریافت بقیه ترفندها پکیج آموزش فرار از آقای جرجندی را از ما تهیه کنید. 🤑🙂
🎥 لینک ویدئو کامل 🎥
میو🙂
🔤 @ninihayesayberi
نینی های مهربون اگه لایو امشب براتون جذاب بود و دوست دارین بیشتر دیده بشه، عموجرج ممنون میشه اگه گزینهی هایپ (Hype) زیر ویدیو، برای اکانت یا آیپی شما فعال بود، روی اون بزنین؛
🚀 اینطوری هایپِ ویدیو میره بالا و افراد بیشتری میتونن لایو رو ببینن.🌸
🎥 لینک لایو 🎥
میو🙂
🔤 @ninihayesayberi
⏳ریپورت کلاهبردار علی حسنی
علی حسنی همین حالا در حال کلاهبرداریه
1⃣ وارد کانال @alihasanivip بشید
2⃣ روی سهنقطه بالا بزنید و گزینه Report (گزارش) رو انتخاب کنید
3⃣ از لیست، بخش Scam or spam (کلاهبرداری یا اسپم) رو بزنید
4⃣ بعد گزینه Fraudulent sales (فروشهای تقلبی) رو انتخاب کنید
5⃣ یک متن کوتاه مثل متن زیر بنویسید:
This channel promotes a rug pull scam.
The project is designed to steal investors’ funds and disap…
🙂دوستان عزیز، این پستهایی که لینکشون پایین گذاشته شده مربوط به کلاهبرداری هانی پات کانال جدید ماهان سپهری هستن. برای اینکه کانال سریعتر توسط تلگرام تگ اسکم بخوره لطفاً هر سه پستی که لینکشونو پایین قرار دادم رو ریپورت کنید.🌸
🛡روش ریپورت:
1️⃣روی لینک پست بزنید تا باز بشه.
2️⃣روی خود پست ضربه بزنید.
3️⃣گزینه گزارش رو بزنید.
4️⃣بخش کلاهبرداری رو انتخاب کنید.
5️⃣بعد یکی از این گزینهها رو بزنید:
🟢فیشینگ
🔴فروش ها…
🙂دوستان عزیز، این پستهایی که لینکشون پایین گذاشته شده مربوط به کلاهبرداری هانی پات هستن. برای اینکه سریعتر توسط تلگرام تگ اسکم بخورن لطفاً همه باهم ریپورت کنیم.
🛡روش ریپورت:
1️⃣روی لینک پست بزنید تا باز بشه.
2️⃣روی خود پست ضربه بزنید.
3️⃣گزینه گزارش رو بزنید.
4️⃣بخش کلاهبرداری رو انتخاب کنید.
5️⃣بعد یکی از این گزینهها رو بزنید:
🟢فیشینگ
🔴فروش های تقلبی
6️⃣یکی از متنهای آماده زیر رو کپی کنید و داخل توضیحات پ…
⭕️ کانال «وبآموز» به مدیریت آقای جرجندی، که مدتهاست به دنبال دریافت باج بوده، با کمک شما عزیزان تگ اسکم خورد.
میو🙂
🔤 @ninihayesayberi
🤣47custom 492966477259027338315💊2❤1😈1😡1
Signed ㅤ fatoli
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ninihayesayberi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
یه نفرقبلاً تو پروژه پانزی بود. بعد ازاینکه پروژه تو ایران جمع شدسرمایهشو از دست داد وعضو گروه مبارزه با جرایم سایبری شد و متوجه شدکلاهبرداری بوده، اما یه ماه بعد دوباره رفته سراغ همون پروژه تو یه کشوردیگه ومیگه: برگشتم پولمو پس بگیرم.
این کار اسمش چیه؟
1️⃣نشونه ی هوش بالاست، فقط اشتباهی ازش استفاده کرده9%
2️⃣خودش الان بخشی از کلاهبرداریه20%
3️⃣دلش برای خودش سوخته بود، ولی برای اعضای جدید نه8%
4️⃣به خیال خودش کارش درسته، ولی با لیدر کلاهبردار فرقی نداشته10%
5️⃣اوج ساده لوحی و خودفریبی بوده5%
6️⃣قربانی جدیدِ توهمِ جبران ضرر14%
7️⃣هیچوقت فکر نمیکردم همچین شخصی، یه روزی ادمین گروه مبارزه با جرایم سایبری بشه33%
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 23 May 2025 to 28 January 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,060,296 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
2
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
2
vacant every time we have ever looked
@ninihayesayberi named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@arash_analysis_vip named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@sepehri_trade named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“نینی های سایبری” (@ninihayesayberi), 380 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ninihayesayberi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.