13 Aug 2026, 04:46 UTC307 views0 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo
今天在线哦～
Channel
柠柠的频道
@ningning9898
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
100subscribers
+13 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1004258263192 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ningning9898 |
| Created | 28 July 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ningning9898 |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 10:49 | 100 | +13 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 21:02 | 87 | first reading |
Engagement
8 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 308.1%
- avg views ÷ 100 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 308
- 7 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 8
- of 8 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 7 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 8 (28 July 2026 – 13 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,157 |
| Reactions total | 0 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Aug 2026, 21:02 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 5s
- Average length
- 5s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
13 Aug 2026, 04:45 UTC302 views0 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo
⚔ 宝可梦训练家对战报告 ⚔ 【👾 宝可梦代号】：柠柠 【🎰 综合表现得分】：8.17 【💰 性价比得分】：9 【人照】：9.0 【颜值】：7.0 【身材】：8.0 【态度】：8.0 【对战过程】：柠柠车评。看见群里上了一个单3老师，偶然路过就想去探探。正好时间合适就约了一课。柠柠老师在电视塔附近，位置好找，进门穿着黑丝袜包臀裙。态度热情，聊天抽烟休息以后，自助洗澡。老师皮肤深小麦色，胸B，软。舔胸，漫游，舔蛋，舌头灵活。口活非常不错，包裹感强。口的时间更长，无齿感。插进去挺紧，会缩印，有吮吸感。后入屁股大，五档结束战斗。可以口爆，但是没有体验。老师技术很好，三张非常值。喜欢体验技术的🐺友推荐体验。少妇类型，3张性价比很高。 【推荐|一般|拉胯】：👍 好评 【👤 训练家留名】：初号機 EVA 【🪖 工兵车评】：否 🔋 本车评由西安宝可梦 @BKM_029 审核通过❗
13 Aug 2026, 04:45 UTC277 viewsread 13 August 2026
Photo
⚔ 宝可梦训练家对战报告 ⚔ 【👾 宝可梦代号】：柠柠 【🎰 综合表现得分】：8.42 【💰 性价比得分】：10 【人照】：8.5 【颜值】：8.0 【身材】：8.0 【态度】：9.0 【对战过程】：柠柠车评 柠柠，年龄28左右，🐻b，体重90多，身高大概160cm，皮肤黄挺光滑的，人照8.5，颜值中上，短发。 看到南郊新来了一个单3老师，昨天正好下班晚，正好柠柠老师没有下班，就上了一课。 消息回复比较及时，到地方没有罚站，路线指引比较清晰，环境是两居住宅，环境还可以。 进门态度比较好，然后就洗澡，出来帮助擦背，柠柠老师换上了黑丝包臀裙，然后就躺下开始。先是舔胸，舌头很软，舔的很舒服，舔蛋。 重点是口活，口活是口的真好啊，深喉，舌头螺旋搅动，全方位的刺激，爽爆。最后做，做的时候姿势很配合，bb挺紧的，水量也可以，bb是个小蝴蝶，女上挺卖力的，最后出货，洗完澡撤退。 总结，单3，口活无敌，泄火无敌，好评强烈推荐。 【推荐|一般|…
13 Aug 2026, 04:45 UTC247 viewsread 13 August 2026
Photo
⚔ 宝可梦训练家对战报告 ⚔ 【👾 宝可梦代号】：柠柠 【🎰 综合表现得分】：9.3 【💰 性价比得分】：10 【人照】：9.0 【颜值】：9.8 【身材】：9.0 【态度】：10.0 【对战过程】：进去老师笑起来很好看 比照片颜值更高 进门老师照顾的特别热情 简单洗一下 老师才是新来的 进门开始做服务 添蛋 老师身材也很好 胸手感特别好 口活特别棒 然后就开干 特别爽 老师很紧 非常舒服也很配合 【推荐|一般|拉胯】：👍 好评 【👤 训练家留名】：Pearl Por 【🪖 工兵车评】：是 🔋 本车评由西安宝可梦 @BKM_029 审核通过❗
13 Aug 2026, 04:45 UTC228 viewsread 13 August 2026
Photo
⚔ 宝可梦训练家对战报告 ⚔ 【👾 宝可梦代号】：柠柠 【🎰 综合表现得分】：8.5 【💰 性价比得分】：10 【人照】：8.0 【颜值】：8.0 【身材】：8.0 【态度】：9.0 【对战过程】：新妹柠柠出现蠢蠢欲动，约好时间，准时前往，见面第一感觉不错，笑起来挺勾人的，是明显经验丰富的少妇，简单洗了一下，上床常规舔胸，然后舔蛋，然后刺激的就来了。口是真的惊艳，能感受到整个根都在被照顾，像是螺旋一样很爽，因为口很爽所以让多口了一会过瘾然后正戏。批很紧，会+会吸，高速几分钟就败下舞台，总结经验丰富，口活很好，批感也不错，这个价格极具性价比。住宅两居室环境可以，妹子活硬的一批，流连忘返，这个价格这个体验爽翻天，必须多刷几次。 【推荐|一般|拉胯】：👍 好评 【👤 训练家留名】：月之星也 【🪖 工兵车评】：否 🔋 本车评由西安宝可梦 @BKM_029 审核通过❗
11 Aug 2026, 05:16 UTC245 viewsread 13 August 2026
开课了，今天在哦
28 Jul 2026, 11:38 UTC551 viewsread 13 August 2026
Photo
各位宝宝们好～新人报道💋 私聊: @ningning3p6pp 双向: @ningning98_bot 频道: @ningning9898
28 Jul 2026, 10:57 UTCviews —
Channel created
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @ningning9898. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 907,709 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“柠柠的频道” (@ningning9898), 100 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ningning9898.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.